Cargando…

Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming

The Washington Group questions (WGQ) on functioning have been widely promoted as the go-to tool for disability data collection. Designed for use by government, the WGQ have been adopted by non-government organizations (NGOs) for use in programming. However, little is known about how the WGQs are bei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robinson, Alex, Nguyen, Liem, Smith, Fleur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34769661
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111143
_version_ 1784597103463366656
author Robinson, Alex
Nguyen, Liem
Smith, Fleur
author_facet Robinson, Alex
Nguyen, Liem
Smith, Fleur
author_sort Robinson, Alex
collection PubMed
description The Washington Group questions (WGQ) on functioning have been widely promoted as the go-to tool for disability data collection. Designed for use by government, the WGQ have been adopted by non-government organizations (NGOs) for use in programming. However, little is known about how the WGQs are being used by NGOs or how use may be contributing to disability inclusion. Method: This paper describes exploratory research on the use of the WGQ in NGO programming. An online survey provided an overview of adoption followed by semi-structured interviews from a purposive sample to explore data collection, analysis, and use. Results: Thematic analysis showed limited inclusion outcomes directly attributable to use of the WGQ, adoption driven by individual champions rather than systematically across organizations, and challenges in data collection resulting in a wide range of prevalence rates. What information the WGQ can realistically contribute to programs was also overestimated. However, the process of using the WGQ was raising awareness on disability inclusion within program teams and communities. Conclusion: Acknowledging differences in emerging use by NGOs beyond the WGQ’s intended purpose, alongside promoting a flexible and staged approach to adoption and use in programming, may improve utility and disability inclusion outcomes over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8582947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85829472021-11-12 Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming Robinson, Alex Nguyen, Liem Smith, Fleur Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The Washington Group questions (WGQ) on functioning have been widely promoted as the go-to tool for disability data collection. Designed for use by government, the WGQ have been adopted by non-government organizations (NGOs) for use in programming. However, little is known about how the WGQs are being used by NGOs or how use may be contributing to disability inclusion. Method: This paper describes exploratory research on the use of the WGQ in NGO programming. An online survey provided an overview of adoption followed by semi-structured interviews from a purposive sample to explore data collection, analysis, and use. Results: Thematic analysis showed limited inclusion outcomes directly attributable to use of the WGQ, adoption driven by individual champions rather than systematically across organizations, and challenges in data collection resulting in a wide range of prevalence rates. What information the WGQ can realistically contribute to programs was also overestimated. However, the process of using the WGQ was raising awareness on disability inclusion within program teams and communities. Conclusion: Acknowledging differences in emerging use by NGOs beyond the WGQ’s intended purpose, alongside promoting a flexible and staged approach to adoption and use in programming, may improve utility and disability inclusion outcomes over time. MDPI 2021-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8582947/ /pubmed/34769661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111143 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Robinson, Alex
Nguyen, Liem
Smith, Fleur
Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming
title Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming
title_full Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming
title_fullStr Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming
title_full_unstemmed Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming
title_short Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming
title_sort use of the washington group questions in non-government programming
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34769661
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111143
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonalex useofthewashingtongroupquestionsinnongovernmentprogramming
AT nguyenliem useofthewashingtongroupquestionsinnongovernmentprogramming
AT smithfleur useofthewashingtongroupquestionsinnongovernmentprogramming