Cargando…
Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming
The Washington Group questions (WGQ) on functioning have been widely promoted as the go-to tool for disability data collection. Designed for use by government, the WGQ have been adopted by non-government organizations (NGOs) for use in programming. However, little is known about how the WGQs are bei...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34769661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111143 |
_version_ | 1784597103463366656 |
---|---|
author | Robinson, Alex Nguyen, Liem Smith, Fleur |
author_facet | Robinson, Alex Nguyen, Liem Smith, Fleur |
author_sort | Robinson, Alex |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Washington Group questions (WGQ) on functioning have been widely promoted as the go-to tool for disability data collection. Designed for use by government, the WGQ have been adopted by non-government organizations (NGOs) for use in programming. However, little is known about how the WGQs are being used by NGOs or how use may be contributing to disability inclusion. Method: This paper describes exploratory research on the use of the WGQ in NGO programming. An online survey provided an overview of adoption followed by semi-structured interviews from a purposive sample to explore data collection, analysis, and use. Results: Thematic analysis showed limited inclusion outcomes directly attributable to use of the WGQ, adoption driven by individual champions rather than systematically across organizations, and challenges in data collection resulting in a wide range of prevalence rates. What information the WGQ can realistically contribute to programs was also overestimated. However, the process of using the WGQ was raising awareness on disability inclusion within program teams and communities. Conclusion: Acknowledging differences in emerging use by NGOs beyond the WGQ’s intended purpose, alongside promoting a flexible and staged approach to adoption and use in programming, may improve utility and disability inclusion outcomes over time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8582947 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85829472021-11-12 Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming Robinson, Alex Nguyen, Liem Smith, Fleur Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The Washington Group questions (WGQ) on functioning have been widely promoted as the go-to tool for disability data collection. Designed for use by government, the WGQ have been adopted by non-government organizations (NGOs) for use in programming. However, little is known about how the WGQs are being used by NGOs or how use may be contributing to disability inclusion. Method: This paper describes exploratory research on the use of the WGQ in NGO programming. An online survey provided an overview of adoption followed by semi-structured interviews from a purposive sample to explore data collection, analysis, and use. Results: Thematic analysis showed limited inclusion outcomes directly attributable to use of the WGQ, adoption driven by individual champions rather than systematically across organizations, and challenges in data collection resulting in a wide range of prevalence rates. What information the WGQ can realistically contribute to programs was also overestimated. However, the process of using the WGQ was raising awareness on disability inclusion within program teams and communities. Conclusion: Acknowledging differences in emerging use by NGOs beyond the WGQ’s intended purpose, alongside promoting a flexible and staged approach to adoption and use in programming, may improve utility and disability inclusion outcomes over time. MDPI 2021-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8582947/ /pubmed/34769661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111143 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Robinson, Alex Nguyen, Liem Smith, Fleur Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming |
title | Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming |
title_full | Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming |
title_fullStr | Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming |
title_short | Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming |
title_sort | use of the washington group questions in non-government programming |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34769661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111143 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robinsonalex useofthewashingtongroupquestionsinnongovernmentprogramming AT nguyenliem useofthewashingtongroupquestionsinnongovernmentprogramming AT smithfleur useofthewashingtongroupquestionsinnongovernmentprogramming |