Cargando…

When Does a Lot Become Too Much? A Q Methodological Investigation of UK Student Perceptions of Digital Addiction

Despite the benefits of the internet and other digital technology, the online world has been associated with a negative impact on university student wellbeing. Many university students report symptoms of pathological internet use. Internationally, further research is needed to understand what studen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turner, Luke, Bewick, Bridgette M., Kent, Sarah, Khyabani, Azaria, Bryant, Louise, Summers, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8583480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34769664
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111149
_version_ 1784597214281072640
author Turner, Luke
Bewick, Bridgette M.
Kent, Sarah
Khyabani, Azaria
Bryant, Louise
Summers, Barbara
author_facet Turner, Luke
Bewick, Bridgette M.
Kent, Sarah
Khyabani, Azaria
Bryant, Louise
Summers, Barbara
author_sort Turner, Luke
collection PubMed
description Despite the benefits of the internet and other digital technology, the online world has been associated with a negative impact on university student wellbeing. Many university students report symptoms of pathological internet use. Internationally, further research is needed to understand what student users of technology perceive to be problematic internet and/or digital use. The current study explores the range of perceptions that university students hold about ‘digital addiction’. We recruited 33 participants from a UK university into a Q-methodology study. Participants sorted, ranked, and commented on fifty-two statements representing the concourse of ‘things written or said about digital addiction’. The statements were identified from a comprehensive search of a wide variety of sources (e.g., newspapers, academic articles, blogs, and YouTube). Principal Component Analysis was used to identify four distinct viewpoints of ‘digital addiction’: (I) digital addiction is differentiated by the negative consequences experienced by addicted individuals; (II) digital addiction comes from our fascination with the online world; (III) digital addiction is an attempt to escape real world problems and impacts on mental health and relationships; (IV) digital addiction is defined by the amount of time we spend online. All four viewpoints share the perception that people do not realize they are digitally addicted because using and having digital devices on you at all times has become the social norm. There was also overall agreement that that those with ‘addictive personalities’ were more likely to be ‘digitally addicted’. Despite these similarities, complexity and contradictions within the viewpoints surrounding what digital addiction is and how it might be defined are apparent. The information found in this study provides important suggestions of how we might frame prevention and early intervention messages to engage students and ensure they develop the skills necessary to successfully manage their digital lives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8583480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85834802021-11-12 When Does a Lot Become Too Much? A Q Methodological Investigation of UK Student Perceptions of Digital Addiction Turner, Luke Bewick, Bridgette M. Kent, Sarah Khyabani, Azaria Bryant, Louise Summers, Barbara Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Despite the benefits of the internet and other digital technology, the online world has been associated with a negative impact on university student wellbeing. Many university students report symptoms of pathological internet use. Internationally, further research is needed to understand what student users of technology perceive to be problematic internet and/or digital use. The current study explores the range of perceptions that university students hold about ‘digital addiction’. We recruited 33 participants from a UK university into a Q-methodology study. Participants sorted, ranked, and commented on fifty-two statements representing the concourse of ‘things written or said about digital addiction’. The statements were identified from a comprehensive search of a wide variety of sources (e.g., newspapers, academic articles, blogs, and YouTube). Principal Component Analysis was used to identify four distinct viewpoints of ‘digital addiction’: (I) digital addiction is differentiated by the negative consequences experienced by addicted individuals; (II) digital addiction comes from our fascination with the online world; (III) digital addiction is an attempt to escape real world problems and impacts on mental health and relationships; (IV) digital addiction is defined by the amount of time we spend online. All four viewpoints share the perception that people do not realize they are digitally addicted because using and having digital devices on you at all times has become the social norm. There was also overall agreement that that those with ‘addictive personalities’ were more likely to be ‘digitally addicted’. Despite these similarities, complexity and contradictions within the viewpoints surrounding what digital addiction is and how it might be defined are apparent. The information found in this study provides important suggestions of how we might frame prevention and early intervention messages to engage students and ensure they develop the skills necessary to successfully manage their digital lives. MDPI 2021-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8583480/ /pubmed/34769664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111149 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Turner, Luke
Bewick, Bridgette M.
Kent, Sarah
Khyabani, Azaria
Bryant, Louise
Summers, Barbara
When Does a Lot Become Too Much? A Q Methodological Investigation of UK Student Perceptions of Digital Addiction
title When Does a Lot Become Too Much? A Q Methodological Investigation of UK Student Perceptions of Digital Addiction
title_full When Does a Lot Become Too Much? A Q Methodological Investigation of UK Student Perceptions of Digital Addiction
title_fullStr When Does a Lot Become Too Much? A Q Methodological Investigation of UK Student Perceptions of Digital Addiction
title_full_unstemmed When Does a Lot Become Too Much? A Q Methodological Investigation of UK Student Perceptions of Digital Addiction
title_short When Does a Lot Become Too Much? A Q Methodological Investigation of UK Student Perceptions of Digital Addiction
title_sort when does a lot become too much? a q methodological investigation of uk student perceptions of digital addiction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8583480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34769664
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111149
work_keys_str_mv AT turnerluke whendoesalotbecometoomuchaqmethodologicalinvestigationofukstudentperceptionsofdigitaladdiction
AT bewickbridgettem whendoesalotbecometoomuchaqmethodologicalinvestigationofukstudentperceptionsofdigitaladdiction
AT kentsarah whendoesalotbecometoomuchaqmethodologicalinvestigationofukstudentperceptionsofdigitaladdiction
AT khyabaniazaria whendoesalotbecometoomuchaqmethodologicalinvestigationofukstudentperceptionsofdigitaladdiction
AT bryantlouise whendoesalotbecometoomuchaqmethodologicalinvestigationofukstudentperceptionsofdigitaladdiction
AT summersbarbara whendoesalotbecometoomuchaqmethodologicalinvestigationofukstudentperceptionsofdigitaladdiction