Cargando…

Unattended compared to traditional blood pressure measurement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised cross-over study

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is characterised by a high prevalence, low awareness and poor control among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Correct blood pressure (BP) measurement is highly important in these subjects. The “unattended” BP measurement aims to reduce the “white-coat effect,” a phenomenon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bartoloni, Elena, Angeli, Fabio, Marcucci, Elisa, Perricone, Carlo, Cafaro, Giacomo, Riccini, Clara, Spighi, Lorenzo, Gildoni, Benedetta, Cavallini, Claudio, Verdecchia, Paolo, Gerli, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8583925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34751628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1999493
_version_ 1784597321410936832
author Bartoloni, Elena
Angeli, Fabio
Marcucci, Elisa
Perricone, Carlo
Cafaro, Giacomo
Riccini, Clara
Spighi, Lorenzo
Gildoni, Benedetta
Cavallini, Claudio
Verdecchia, Paolo
Gerli, Roberto
author_facet Bartoloni, Elena
Angeli, Fabio
Marcucci, Elisa
Perricone, Carlo
Cafaro, Giacomo
Riccini, Clara
Spighi, Lorenzo
Gildoni, Benedetta
Cavallini, Claudio
Verdecchia, Paolo
Gerli, Roberto
author_sort Bartoloni, Elena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hypertension is characterised by a high prevalence, low awareness and poor control among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Correct blood pressure (BP) measurement is highly important in these subjects. The “unattended” BP measurement aims to reduce the “white-coat effect,” a phenomenon associated with cardiovascular risk. Data on “unattended” BP measurement in RA and its impact on hypertensive organ damage are very limited. METHODS: BP was measured in the same patient both traditionally (“attended” BP) and by the “unattended” protocol (3 automated office BP measurements, at 1-min intervals, after 5 min of rest, with patient left alone) by a randomised cross-over design. Patients underwent clinical examination, 12-lead electrocardiography and trans-thoracic echocardiography to evaluate cardiac damage. RESULTS: Sixty-two RA patients (mean age 67 ± 9 years, 87% women) were enrolled. Hypertension was diagnosed in 79% and 66% of patients according to ACC/AHA and ESC/ESH criteria, respectively. Concordance correlation coefficients between the two techniques were 0.55 (95%, CI 0.38–0.68) for systolic BP and 0.73 (95%, CI 0.60–0.82) for diastolic BP. “Unattended” (121.7/68.6 mmHg) was lower than “attended” BP (130.5/72.8 mmHg) for systolic and diastolic BP (both p < .0001). Among the two techniques, only “unattended” systolic BP showed a significant association with left ventricular mass (r = 0.11; p = .40 for “attended” BP; r = 0.27; p = .036 for unattended BP; difference between slopes: z = 3.92; p = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In RA patients, “unattended” BP is lower than traditional (“attended”) BP and more closely associated with LV mass. In these patients, the “unattended” automated BP measurement is a promising tool which requires further evaluation. KEY MESSAGES: “Unattended” automated blood pressure registration, aimed to reduce the “white-coat effect” is lower than “attended” value in rheumatoid arthritis patients. “Unattended” blood pressure is more closely associated with left ventricular mass than “attende” registration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8583925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85839252021-11-12 Unattended compared to traditional blood pressure measurement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised cross-over study Bartoloni, Elena Angeli, Fabio Marcucci, Elisa Perricone, Carlo Cafaro, Giacomo Riccini, Clara Spighi, Lorenzo Gildoni, Benedetta Cavallini, Claudio Verdecchia, Paolo Gerli, Roberto Ann Med Cardiology & Cardiovascular Disorders BACKGROUND: Hypertension is characterised by a high prevalence, low awareness and poor control among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Correct blood pressure (BP) measurement is highly important in these subjects. The “unattended” BP measurement aims to reduce the “white-coat effect,” a phenomenon associated with cardiovascular risk. Data on “unattended” BP measurement in RA and its impact on hypertensive organ damage are very limited. METHODS: BP was measured in the same patient both traditionally (“attended” BP) and by the “unattended” protocol (3 automated office BP measurements, at 1-min intervals, after 5 min of rest, with patient left alone) by a randomised cross-over design. Patients underwent clinical examination, 12-lead electrocardiography and trans-thoracic echocardiography to evaluate cardiac damage. RESULTS: Sixty-two RA patients (mean age 67 ± 9 years, 87% women) were enrolled. Hypertension was diagnosed in 79% and 66% of patients according to ACC/AHA and ESC/ESH criteria, respectively. Concordance correlation coefficients between the two techniques were 0.55 (95%, CI 0.38–0.68) for systolic BP and 0.73 (95%, CI 0.60–0.82) for diastolic BP. “Unattended” (121.7/68.6 mmHg) was lower than “attended” BP (130.5/72.8 mmHg) for systolic and diastolic BP (both p < .0001). Among the two techniques, only “unattended” systolic BP showed a significant association with left ventricular mass (r = 0.11; p = .40 for “attended” BP; r = 0.27; p = .036 for unattended BP; difference between slopes: z = 3.92; p = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In RA patients, “unattended” BP is lower than traditional (“attended”) BP and more closely associated with LV mass. In these patients, the “unattended” automated BP measurement is a promising tool which requires further evaluation. KEY MESSAGES: “Unattended” automated blood pressure registration, aimed to reduce the “white-coat effect” is lower than “attended” value in rheumatoid arthritis patients. “Unattended” blood pressure is more closely associated with left ventricular mass than “attende” registration. Taylor & Francis 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8583925/ /pubmed/34751628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1999493 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cardiology & Cardiovascular Disorders
Bartoloni, Elena
Angeli, Fabio
Marcucci, Elisa
Perricone, Carlo
Cafaro, Giacomo
Riccini, Clara
Spighi, Lorenzo
Gildoni, Benedetta
Cavallini, Claudio
Verdecchia, Paolo
Gerli, Roberto
Unattended compared to traditional blood pressure measurement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised cross-over study
title Unattended compared to traditional blood pressure measurement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised cross-over study
title_full Unattended compared to traditional blood pressure measurement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised cross-over study
title_fullStr Unattended compared to traditional blood pressure measurement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised cross-over study
title_full_unstemmed Unattended compared to traditional blood pressure measurement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised cross-over study
title_short Unattended compared to traditional blood pressure measurement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised cross-over study
title_sort unattended compared to traditional blood pressure measurement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised cross-over study
topic Cardiology & Cardiovascular Disorders
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8583925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34751628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1999493
work_keys_str_mv AT bartolonielena unattendedcomparedtotraditionalbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisarandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT angelifabio unattendedcomparedtotraditionalbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisarandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT marcuccielisa unattendedcomparedtotraditionalbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisarandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT perriconecarlo unattendedcomparedtotraditionalbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisarandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT cafarogiacomo unattendedcomparedtotraditionalbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisarandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT ricciniclara unattendedcomparedtotraditionalbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisarandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT spighilorenzo unattendedcomparedtotraditionalbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisarandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT gildonibenedetta unattendedcomparedtotraditionalbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisarandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT cavalliniclaudio unattendedcomparedtotraditionalbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisarandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT verdecchiapaolo unattendedcomparedtotraditionalbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisarandomisedcrossoverstudy
AT gerliroberto unattendedcomparedtotraditionalbloodpressuremeasurementinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisarandomisedcrossoverstudy