Cargando…
Teprotumumab in Clinical Practice: Recommendations and Considerations From the OPTIC Trial Investigators
Thyroid eye disease (TED) is a vision-threatening and debilitating condition that until very recently had no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medical therapies. Teprotumumab has recently been approved to treat TED. We aim to provide guidance for its use, based on the input of the US inves...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33417417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000001134 |
_version_ | 1784597390736490496 |
---|---|
author | Douglas, Raymond S. Wang, Yao Dailey, Roger A. Harris, Gerald J. Wester, Sara T. Schiffman, Jade S. Tang, Rosa A. Fowler, Brian Fleming, James Smith, Terry J. |
author_facet | Douglas, Raymond S. Wang, Yao Dailey, Roger A. Harris, Gerald J. Wester, Sara T. Schiffman, Jade S. Tang, Rosa A. Fowler, Brian Fleming, James Smith, Terry J. |
author_sort | Douglas, Raymond S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Thyroid eye disease (TED) is a vision-threatening and debilitating condition that until very recently had no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medical therapies. Teprotumumab has recently been approved to treat TED. We aim to provide guidance for its use, based on the input of the US investigators who participated in Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials. METHODS: An expert panel was convened on October 11th and November 16th of 2019. All panel members had extensive experience as investigators in the Phase 2 and/or Phase 3 clinical trials of teprotumumab. Consensus among those investigators was reached to determine patient characteristics most appropriate for teprotumumab treatment. Safety guidelines were also reviewed and agreed on. RESULTS: The authors recommend that teprotumumab be considered first-line therapy for patients with clinically significant ophthalmopathy, including those with disease duration exceeding 9 months. The clinical activity score (CAS) may be useful for longitudinal monitoring but should not be used to determine treatment eligibility. Criteria will likely be expanded after more experience with the drug. Using teprotumumab for patients with TED with substantial signs, symptoms, or morbidity without a CAS score of >4 (e.g., progressive proptosis, diplopia, and early compressive optic neuropathy) or more, could be considered. Diabetes mellitus and inflammatory bowel disease comorbidities should not be exclusionary, but stringent monitoring in these patients is recommended. Drug dosing, administration interval, and duration should adhere to the study protocol: 8 infusions, separated by 3 weeks. Patients with more severe disease may benefit from additional doses. Corticosteroids can be used before or during teprotumumab therapy. Clinical and laboratory monitoring should be consistent with good clinical practice for patients receiving teprotumumab. CONCLUSIONS: Confirming the efficacy of teprotumumab usage outside the narrow parameters of the completed clinical trials will require rigorous scientific validation. As a step in that direction, we believe its on-label usage is appropriately applied to all patients with TED with substantial symptoms or morbidity, as judged by their physician. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8584196 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85841962021-11-12 Teprotumumab in Clinical Practice: Recommendations and Considerations From the OPTIC Trial Investigators Douglas, Raymond S. Wang, Yao Dailey, Roger A. Harris, Gerald J. Wester, Sara T. Schiffman, Jade S. Tang, Rosa A. Fowler, Brian Fleming, James Smith, Terry J. J Neuroophthalmol Original Contribution Thyroid eye disease (TED) is a vision-threatening and debilitating condition that until very recently had no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medical therapies. Teprotumumab has recently been approved to treat TED. We aim to provide guidance for its use, based on the input of the US investigators who participated in Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials. METHODS: An expert panel was convened on October 11th and November 16th of 2019. All panel members had extensive experience as investigators in the Phase 2 and/or Phase 3 clinical trials of teprotumumab. Consensus among those investigators was reached to determine patient characteristics most appropriate for teprotumumab treatment. Safety guidelines were also reviewed and agreed on. RESULTS: The authors recommend that teprotumumab be considered first-line therapy for patients with clinically significant ophthalmopathy, including those with disease duration exceeding 9 months. The clinical activity score (CAS) may be useful for longitudinal monitoring but should not be used to determine treatment eligibility. Criteria will likely be expanded after more experience with the drug. Using teprotumumab for patients with TED with substantial signs, symptoms, or morbidity without a CAS score of >4 (e.g., progressive proptosis, diplopia, and early compressive optic neuropathy) or more, could be considered. Diabetes mellitus and inflammatory bowel disease comorbidities should not be exclusionary, but stringent monitoring in these patients is recommended. Drug dosing, administration interval, and duration should adhere to the study protocol: 8 infusions, separated by 3 weeks. Patients with more severe disease may benefit from additional doses. Corticosteroids can be used before or during teprotumumab therapy. Clinical and laboratory monitoring should be consistent with good clinical practice for patients receiving teprotumumab. CONCLUSIONS: Confirming the efficacy of teprotumumab usage outside the narrow parameters of the completed clinical trials will require rigorous scientific validation. As a step in that direction, we believe its on-label usage is appropriately applied to all patients with TED with substantial symptoms or morbidity, as judged by their physician. Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology 2021-12 2021-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8584196/ /pubmed/33417417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000001134 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the North American Neuro-Opthalmology Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Contribution Douglas, Raymond S. Wang, Yao Dailey, Roger A. Harris, Gerald J. Wester, Sara T. Schiffman, Jade S. Tang, Rosa A. Fowler, Brian Fleming, James Smith, Terry J. Teprotumumab in Clinical Practice: Recommendations and Considerations From the OPTIC Trial Investigators |
title | Teprotumumab in Clinical Practice: Recommendations and Considerations From the OPTIC Trial Investigators |
title_full | Teprotumumab in Clinical Practice: Recommendations and Considerations From the OPTIC Trial Investigators |
title_fullStr | Teprotumumab in Clinical Practice: Recommendations and Considerations From the OPTIC Trial Investigators |
title_full_unstemmed | Teprotumumab in Clinical Practice: Recommendations and Considerations From the OPTIC Trial Investigators |
title_short | Teprotumumab in Clinical Practice: Recommendations and Considerations From the OPTIC Trial Investigators |
title_sort | teprotumumab in clinical practice: recommendations and considerations from the optic trial investigators |
topic | Original Contribution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33417417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000001134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT douglasraymonds teprotumumabinclinicalpracticerecommendationsandconsiderationsfromtheoptictrialinvestigators AT wangyao teprotumumabinclinicalpracticerecommendationsandconsiderationsfromtheoptictrialinvestigators AT daileyrogera teprotumumabinclinicalpracticerecommendationsandconsiderationsfromtheoptictrialinvestigators AT harrisgeraldj teprotumumabinclinicalpracticerecommendationsandconsiderationsfromtheoptictrialinvestigators AT westersarat teprotumumabinclinicalpracticerecommendationsandconsiderationsfromtheoptictrialinvestigators AT schiffmanjades teprotumumabinclinicalpracticerecommendationsandconsiderationsfromtheoptictrialinvestigators AT tangrosaa teprotumumabinclinicalpracticerecommendationsandconsiderationsfromtheoptictrialinvestigators AT fowlerbrian teprotumumabinclinicalpracticerecommendationsandconsiderationsfromtheoptictrialinvestigators AT flemingjames teprotumumabinclinicalpracticerecommendationsandconsiderationsfromtheoptictrialinvestigators AT smithterryj teprotumumabinclinicalpracticerecommendationsandconsiderationsfromtheoptictrialinvestigators |