Cargando…
Analysis of Failed Two-Stage Procedures with Resection Arthroplasty as the First Stage in Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections
Resection arthroplasty can be performed as the first stage of a two-stage procedure in some patients with severe periprosthetic hip joint infections with poor bone stock. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate factors associated with the subsequent failure or success of these patients. Between 2...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215180 |
_version_ | 1784597451626250240 |
---|---|
author | Simon, Sebastian Frank, Bernhard J.H. Gardete, Susana Aichmair, Alexander Mitterer, Jennyfer Angel Dominkus, Martin Hofstaetter, Jochen G. |
author_facet | Simon, Sebastian Frank, Bernhard J.H. Gardete, Susana Aichmair, Alexander Mitterer, Jennyfer Angel Dominkus, Martin Hofstaetter, Jochen G. |
author_sort | Simon, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Resection arthroplasty can be performed as the first stage of a two-stage procedure in some patients with severe periprosthetic hip joint infections with poor bone stock. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate factors associated with the subsequent failure or success of these patients. Between 2011 and 2020; in 61 (26.4%) of 231 patients who underwent a two-stage protocol of periprosthetic hip joint infections; no spacer was used in the first stage. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months. Patient’s demographics and various infection risk factors were analyzed. In total, 37/61 (60.7%) patients underwent a successful reimplantation, and four patients died within the follow-up period. Patients within the failure group had a significantly higher Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.002); number of operations prior to resection arthroplasty (p = 0.022) and were older (p = 0.018). Failure was also associated with the presence of a positive culture in the first- and second-stage procedures (p = 0.012). Additional risk factors were persistent high postoperative CRP values and the requirement of a negative-pressure wound therapy (p ≤ 0.05). In conclusion, multiple factors need to be evaluated when trying to predict the outcome of patients undergoing resection arthroplasty as the first stage of a two-stage procedure in patients with challenging periprosthetic hip joint infections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8584448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85844482021-11-12 Analysis of Failed Two-Stage Procedures with Resection Arthroplasty as the First Stage in Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections Simon, Sebastian Frank, Bernhard J.H. Gardete, Susana Aichmair, Alexander Mitterer, Jennyfer Angel Dominkus, Martin Hofstaetter, Jochen G. J Clin Med Article Resection arthroplasty can be performed as the first stage of a two-stage procedure in some patients with severe periprosthetic hip joint infections with poor bone stock. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate factors associated with the subsequent failure or success of these patients. Between 2011 and 2020; in 61 (26.4%) of 231 patients who underwent a two-stage protocol of periprosthetic hip joint infections; no spacer was used in the first stage. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months. Patient’s demographics and various infection risk factors were analyzed. In total, 37/61 (60.7%) patients underwent a successful reimplantation, and four patients died within the follow-up period. Patients within the failure group had a significantly higher Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.002); number of operations prior to resection arthroplasty (p = 0.022) and were older (p = 0.018). Failure was also associated with the presence of a positive culture in the first- and second-stage procedures (p = 0.012). Additional risk factors were persistent high postoperative CRP values and the requirement of a negative-pressure wound therapy (p ≤ 0.05). In conclusion, multiple factors need to be evaluated when trying to predict the outcome of patients undergoing resection arthroplasty as the first stage of a two-stage procedure in patients with challenging periprosthetic hip joint infections. MDPI 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8584448/ /pubmed/34768700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215180 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Simon, Sebastian Frank, Bernhard J.H. Gardete, Susana Aichmair, Alexander Mitterer, Jennyfer Angel Dominkus, Martin Hofstaetter, Jochen G. Analysis of Failed Two-Stage Procedures with Resection Arthroplasty as the First Stage in Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections |
title | Analysis of Failed Two-Stage Procedures with Resection Arthroplasty as the First Stage in Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections |
title_full | Analysis of Failed Two-Stage Procedures with Resection Arthroplasty as the First Stage in Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Failed Two-Stage Procedures with Resection Arthroplasty as the First Stage in Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Failed Two-Stage Procedures with Resection Arthroplasty as the First Stage in Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections |
title_short | Analysis of Failed Two-Stage Procedures with Resection Arthroplasty as the First Stage in Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections |
title_sort | analysis of failed two-stage procedures with resection arthroplasty as the first stage in periprosthetic hip joint infections |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215180 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simonsebastian analysisoffailedtwostageprocedureswithresectionarthroplastyasthefirststageinperiprosthetichipjointinfections AT frankbernhardjh analysisoffailedtwostageprocedureswithresectionarthroplastyasthefirststageinperiprosthetichipjointinfections AT gardetesusana analysisoffailedtwostageprocedureswithresectionarthroplastyasthefirststageinperiprosthetichipjointinfections AT aichmairalexander analysisoffailedtwostageprocedureswithresectionarthroplastyasthefirststageinperiprosthetichipjointinfections AT mittererjennyferangel analysisoffailedtwostageprocedureswithresectionarthroplastyasthefirststageinperiprosthetichipjointinfections AT dominkusmartin analysisoffailedtwostageprocedureswithresectionarthroplastyasthefirststageinperiprosthetichipjointinfections AT hofstaetterjocheng analysisoffailedtwostageprocedureswithresectionarthroplastyasthefirststageinperiprosthetichipjointinfections |