Cargando…

Analysis of Failed Two-Stage Procedures with Resection Arthroplasty as the First Stage in Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections

Resection arthroplasty can be performed as the first stage of a two-stage procedure in some patients with severe periprosthetic hip joint infections with poor bone stock. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate factors associated with the subsequent failure or success of these patients. Between 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simon, Sebastian, Frank, Bernhard J.H., Gardete, Susana, Aichmair, Alexander, Mitterer, Jennyfer Angel, Dominkus, Martin, Hofstaetter, Jochen G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768700
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215180
_version_ 1784597451626250240
author Simon, Sebastian
Frank, Bernhard J.H.
Gardete, Susana
Aichmair, Alexander
Mitterer, Jennyfer Angel
Dominkus, Martin
Hofstaetter, Jochen G.
author_facet Simon, Sebastian
Frank, Bernhard J.H.
Gardete, Susana
Aichmair, Alexander
Mitterer, Jennyfer Angel
Dominkus, Martin
Hofstaetter, Jochen G.
author_sort Simon, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description Resection arthroplasty can be performed as the first stage of a two-stage procedure in some patients with severe periprosthetic hip joint infections with poor bone stock. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate factors associated with the subsequent failure or success of these patients. Between 2011 and 2020; in 61 (26.4%) of 231 patients who underwent a two-stage protocol of periprosthetic hip joint infections; no spacer was used in the first stage. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months. Patient’s demographics and various infection risk factors were analyzed. In total, 37/61 (60.7%) patients underwent a successful reimplantation, and four patients died within the follow-up period. Patients within the failure group had a significantly higher Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.002); number of operations prior to resection arthroplasty (p = 0.022) and were older (p = 0.018). Failure was also associated with the presence of a positive culture in the first- and second-stage procedures (p = 0.012). Additional risk factors were persistent high postoperative CRP values and the requirement of a negative-pressure wound therapy (p ≤ 0.05). In conclusion, multiple factors need to be evaluated when trying to predict the outcome of patients undergoing resection arthroplasty as the first stage of a two-stage procedure in patients with challenging periprosthetic hip joint infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8584448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85844482021-11-12 Analysis of Failed Two-Stage Procedures with Resection Arthroplasty as the First Stage in Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections Simon, Sebastian Frank, Bernhard J.H. Gardete, Susana Aichmair, Alexander Mitterer, Jennyfer Angel Dominkus, Martin Hofstaetter, Jochen G. J Clin Med Article Resection arthroplasty can be performed as the first stage of a two-stage procedure in some patients with severe periprosthetic hip joint infections with poor bone stock. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate factors associated with the subsequent failure or success of these patients. Between 2011 and 2020; in 61 (26.4%) of 231 patients who underwent a two-stage protocol of periprosthetic hip joint infections; no spacer was used in the first stage. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months. Patient’s demographics and various infection risk factors were analyzed. In total, 37/61 (60.7%) patients underwent a successful reimplantation, and four patients died within the follow-up period. Patients within the failure group had a significantly higher Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.002); number of operations prior to resection arthroplasty (p = 0.022) and were older (p = 0.018). Failure was also associated with the presence of a positive culture in the first- and second-stage procedures (p = 0.012). Additional risk factors were persistent high postoperative CRP values and the requirement of a negative-pressure wound therapy (p ≤ 0.05). In conclusion, multiple factors need to be evaluated when trying to predict the outcome of patients undergoing resection arthroplasty as the first stage of a two-stage procedure in patients with challenging periprosthetic hip joint infections. MDPI 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8584448/ /pubmed/34768700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215180 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Simon, Sebastian
Frank, Bernhard J.H.
Gardete, Susana
Aichmair, Alexander
Mitterer, Jennyfer Angel
Dominkus, Martin
Hofstaetter, Jochen G.
Analysis of Failed Two-Stage Procedures with Resection Arthroplasty as the First Stage in Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections
title Analysis of Failed Two-Stage Procedures with Resection Arthroplasty as the First Stage in Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections
title_full Analysis of Failed Two-Stage Procedures with Resection Arthroplasty as the First Stage in Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections
title_fullStr Analysis of Failed Two-Stage Procedures with Resection Arthroplasty as the First Stage in Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Failed Two-Stage Procedures with Resection Arthroplasty as the First Stage in Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections
title_short Analysis of Failed Two-Stage Procedures with Resection Arthroplasty as the First Stage in Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections
title_sort analysis of failed two-stage procedures with resection arthroplasty as the first stage in periprosthetic hip joint infections
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768700
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215180
work_keys_str_mv AT simonsebastian analysisoffailedtwostageprocedureswithresectionarthroplastyasthefirststageinperiprosthetichipjointinfections
AT frankbernhardjh analysisoffailedtwostageprocedureswithresectionarthroplastyasthefirststageinperiprosthetichipjointinfections
AT gardetesusana analysisoffailedtwostageprocedureswithresectionarthroplastyasthefirststageinperiprosthetichipjointinfections
AT aichmairalexander analysisoffailedtwostageprocedureswithresectionarthroplastyasthefirststageinperiprosthetichipjointinfections
AT mittererjennyferangel analysisoffailedtwostageprocedureswithresectionarthroplastyasthefirststageinperiprosthetichipjointinfections
AT dominkusmartin analysisoffailedtwostageprocedureswithresectionarthroplastyasthefirststageinperiprosthetichipjointinfections
AT hofstaetterjocheng analysisoffailedtwostageprocedureswithresectionarthroplastyasthefirststageinperiprosthetichipjointinfections