Cargando…

Use of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) in Breast Reconstruction Abdominal Free Flap Donor Sites

Background: Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) may reduce the rate of wound complications and promote healing of the incisional site. We report our experience with this dressing in breast reconstruction patients with abdominal free flap donor sites. Methods: A retrospective cohort stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jennifer, Chapman, Zyg, Cole, Emma, Koide, Satomi, Mah, Eldon, Overstall, Simon, Trotter, Dean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768697
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215176
_version_ 1784597464981962752
author Wang, Jennifer
Chapman, Zyg
Cole, Emma
Koide, Satomi
Mah, Eldon
Overstall, Simon
Trotter, Dean
author_facet Wang, Jennifer
Chapman, Zyg
Cole, Emma
Koide, Satomi
Mah, Eldon
Overstall, Simon
Trotter, Dean
author_sort Wang, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description Background: Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) may reduce the rate of wound complications and promote healing of the incisional site. We report our experience with this dressing in breast reconstruction patients with abdominal free flap donor sites. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who underwent breast reconstruction using abdominal free flaps (DIEP, MS-TRAM) at a single institution (Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria) between 2016 and 2021. Results: 126 female patients (mean age: 50 ± 10 years) were analysed, with 41 and 85 patients in the ciNPT (Prevena) and non-ciNPT (Comfeel) groups, respectively. There were reduced wound complications in almost all outcomes measured in the ciNPT group compared with the non-ciNPT group; however, none reached statistical significance. The ciNPT group demonstrated a lower prevalence of surgical site infections (9.8% vs. 11.8%), wound dehiscence (4.9% vs. 12.9%), wound necrosis (0% vs. 2.4%), and major complication requiring readmission (2.4% vs. 7.1%). Conclusion: The use of ciNPT for abdominal donor sites in breast reconstruction patients with risk factors for poor wound healing may reduce wound complications compared with standard adhesive dressings; however, large scale, randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm these observations. Investigation of the impact of ciNPT patients in comparison with conventional dressings, in cohorts with equivocal risk profiles, remains a focus for future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8584502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85845022021-11-12 Use of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) in Breast Reconstruction Abdominal Free Flap Donor Sites Wang, Jennifer Chapman, Zyg Cole, Emma Koide, Satomi Mah, Eldon Overstall, Simon Trotter, Dean J Clin Med Article Background: Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) may reduce the rate of wound complications and promote healing of the incisional site. We report our experience with this dressing in breast reconstruction patients with abdominal free flap donor sites. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who underwent breast reconstruction using abdominal free flaps (DIEP, MS-TRAM) at a single institution (Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria) between 2016 and 2021. Results: 126 female patients (mean age: 50 ± 10 years) were analysed, with 41 and 85 patients in the ciNPT (Prevena) and non-ciNPT (Comfeel) groups, respectively. There were reduced wound complications in almost all outcomes measured in the ciNPT group compared with the non-ciNPT group; however, none reached statistical significance. The ciNPT group demonstrated a lower prevalence of surgical site infections (9.8% vs. 11.8%), wound dehiscence (4.9% vs. 12.9%), wound necrosis (0% vs. 2.4%), and major complication requiring readmission (2.4% vs. 7.1%). Conclusion: The use of ciNPT for abdominal donor sites in breast reconstruction patients with risk factors for poor wound healing may reduce wound complications compared with standard adhesive dressings; however, large scale, randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm these observations. Investigation of the impact of ciNPT patients in comparison with conventional dressings, in cohorts with equivocal risk profiles, remains a focus for future research. MDPI 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8584502/ /pubmed/34768697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215176 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Jennifer
Chapman, Zyg
Cole, Emma
Koide, Satomi
Mah, Eldon
Overstall, Simon
Trotter, Dean
Use of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) in Breast Reconstruction Abdominal Free Flap Donor Sites
title Use of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) in Breast Reconstruction Abdominal Free Flap Donor Sites
title_full Use of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) in Breast Reconstruction Abdominal Free Flap Donor Sites
title_fullStr Use of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) in Breast Reconstruction Abdominal Free Flap Donor Sites
title_full_unstemmed Use of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) in Breast Reconstruction Abdominal Free Flap Donor Sites
title_short Use of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) in Breast Reconstruction Abdominal Free Flap Donor Sites
title_sort use of closed incision negative pressure therapy (cinpt) in breast reconstruction abdominal free flap donor sites
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768697
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215176
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjennifer useofclosedincisionnegativepressuretherapycinptinbreastreconstructionabdominalfreeflapdonorsites
AT chapmanzyg useofclosedincisionnegativepressuretherapycinptinbreastreconstructionabdominalfreeflapdonorsites
AT coleemma useofclosedincisionnegativepressuretherapycinptinbreastreconstructionabdominalfreeflapdonorsites
AT koidesatomi useofclosedincisionnegativepressuretherapycinptinbreastreconstructionabdominalfreeflapdonorsites
AT maheldon useofclosedincisionnegativepressuretherapycinptinbreastreconstructionabdominalfreeflapdonorsites
AT overstallsimon useofclosedincisionnegativepressuretherapycinptinbreastreconstructionabdominalfreeflapdonorsites
AT trotterdean useofclosedincisionnegativepressuretherapycinptinbreastreconstructionabdominalfreeflapdonorsites