Cargando…

Machine Learning Refutes Loss of Smell as a Risk Indicator of Diabetes Mellitus

Because it is associated with central nervous changes, and olfactory dysfunction has been reported with increased prevalence among persons with diabetes, this study addressed the question of whether the risk of developing diabetes in the next 10 years is reflected in olfactory symptoms. In a cross-s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lötsch, Jörn, Hähner, Antje, Schwarz, Peter E. H., Tselmin, Sergey, Hummel, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768493
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214971
_version_ 1784597493043953664
author Lötsch, Jörn
Hähner, Antje
Schwarz, Peter E. H.
Tselmin, Sergey
Hummel, Thomas
author_facet Lötsch, Jörn
Hähner, Antje
Schwarz, Peter E. H.
Tselmin, Sergey
Hummel, Thomas
author_sort Lötsch, Jörn
collection PubMed
description Because it is associated with central nervous changes, and olfactory dysfunction has been reported with increased prevalence among persons with diabetes, this study addressed the question of whether the risk of developing diabetes in the next 10 years is reflected in olfactory symptoms. In a cross-sectional study, in 164 individuals seeking medical consulting for possible diabetes, olfactory function was evaluated using a standardized clinical test assessing olfactory threshold, odor discrimination, and odor identification. Metabolomics parameters were assessed via blood concentrations. The individual diabetes risk was quantified according to the validated German version of the “FINDRISK” diabetes risk score. Machine learning algorithms trained with metabolomics patterns predicted low or high diabetes risk with a balanced accuracy of 63–75%. Similarly, olfactory subtest results predicted the olfactory dysfunction category with a balanced accuracy of 85–94%, occasionally reaching 100%. However, olfactory subtest results failed to improve the prediction of diabetes risk based on metabolomics data, and metabolomics data did not improve the prediction of the olfactory dysfunction category based on olfactory subtest results. Results of the present study suggest that olfactory function is not a useful predictor of diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8584618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85846182021-11-12 Machine Learning Refutes Loss of Smell as a Risk Indicator of Diabetes Mellitus Lötsch, Jörn Hähner, Antje Schwarz, Peter E. H. Tselmin, Sergey Hummel, Thomas J Clin Med Article Because it is associated with central nervous changes, and olfactory dysfunction has been reported with increased prevalence among persons with diabetes, this study addressed the question of whether the risk of developing diabetes in the next 10 years is reflected in olfactory symptoms. In a cross-sectional study, in 164 individuals seeking medical consulting for possible diabetes, olfactory function was evaluated using a standardized clinical test assessing olfactory threshold, odor discrimination, and odor identification. Metabolomics parameters were assessed via blood concentrations. The individual diabetes risk was quantified according to the validated German version of the “FINDRISK” diabetes risk score. Machine learning algorithms trained with metabolomics patterns predicted low or high diabetes risk with a balanced accuracy of 63–75%. Similarly, olfactory subtest results predicted the olfactory dysfunction category with a balanced accuracy of 85–94%, occasionally reaching 100%. However, olfactory subtest results failed to improve the prediction of diabetes risk based on metabolomics data, and metabolomics data did not improve the prediction of the olfactory dysfunction category based on olfactory subtest results. Results of the present study suggest that olfactory function is not a useful predictor of diabetes. MDPI 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8584618/ /pubmed/34768493 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214971 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lötsch, Jörn
Hähner, Antje
Schwarz, Peter E. H.
Tselmin, Sergey
Hummel, Thomas
Machine Learning Refutes Loss of Smell as a Risk Indicator of Diabetes Mellitus
title Machine Learning Refutes Loss of Smell as a Risk Indicator of Diabetes Mellitus
title_full Machine Learning Refutes Loss of Smell as a Risk Indicator of Diabetes Mellitus
title_fullStr Machine Learning Refutes Loss of Smell as a Risk Indicator of Diabetes Mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning Refutes Loss of Smell as a Risk Indicator of Diabetes Mellitus
title_short Machine Learning Refutes Loss of Smell as a Risk Indicator of Diabetes Mellitus
title_sort machine learning refutes loss of smell as a risk indicator of diabetes mellitus
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768493
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214971
work_keys_str_mv AT lotschjorn machinelearningrefuteslossofsmellasariskindicatorofdiabetesmellitus
AT hahnerantje machinelearningrefuteslossofsmellasariskindicatorofdiabetesmellitus
AT schwarzpetereh machinelearningrefuteslossofsmellasariskindicatorofdiabetesmellitus
AT tselminsergey machinelearningrefuteslossofsmellasariskindicatorofdiabetesmellitus
AT hummelthomas machinelearningrefuteslossofsmellasariskindicatorofdiabetesmellitus