Cargando…
Machine Learning Refutes Loss of Smell as a Risk Indicator of Diabetes Mellitus
Because it is associated with central nervous changes, and olfactory dysfunction has been reported with increased prevalence among persons with diabetes, this study addressed the question of whether the risk of developing diabetes in the next 10 years is reflected in olfactory symptoms. In a cross-s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768493 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214971 |
_version_ | 1784597493043953664 |
---|---|
author | Lötsch, Jörn Hähner, Antje Schwarz, Peter E. H. Tselmin, Sergey Hummel, Thomas |
author_facet | Lötsch, Jörn Hähner, Antje Schwarz, Peter E. H. Tselmin, Sergey Hummel, Thomas |
author_sort | Lötsch, Jörn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Because it is associated with central nervous changes, and olfactory dysfunction has been reported with increased prevalence among persons with diabetes, this study addressed the question of whether the risk of developing diabetes in the next 10 years is reflected in olfactory symptoms. In a cross-sectional study, in 164 individuals seeking medical consulting for possible diabetes, olfactory function was evaluated using a standardized clinical test assessing olfactory threshold, odor discrimination, and odor identification. Metabolomics parameters were assessed via blood concentrations. The individual diabetes risk was quantified according to the validated German version of the “FINDRISK” diabetes risk score. Machine learning algorithms trained with metabolomics patterns predicted low or high diabetes risk with a balanced accuracy of 63–75%. Similarly, olfactory subtest results predicted the olfactory dysfunction category with a balanced accuracy of 85–94%, occasionally reaching 100%. However, olfactory subtest results failed to improve the prediction of diabetes risk based on metabolomics data, and metabolomics data did not improve the prediction of the olfactory dysfunction category based on olfactory subtest results. Results of the present study suggest that olfactory function is not a useful predictor of diabetes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8584618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85846182021-11-12 Machine Learning Refutes Loss of Smell as a Risk Indicator of Diabetes Mellitus Lötsch, Jörn Hähner, Antje Schwarz, Peter E. H. Tselmin, Sergey Hummel, Thomas J Clin Med Article Because it is associated with central nervous changes, and olfactory dysfunction has been reported with increased prevalence among persons with diabetes, this study addressed the question of whether the risk of developing diabetes in the next 10 years is reflected in olfactory symptoms. In a cross-sectional study, in 164 individuals seeking medical consulting for possible diabetes, olfactory function was evaluated using a standardized clinical test assessing olfactory threshold, odor discrimination, and odor identification. Metabolomics parameters were assessed via blood concentrations. The individual diabetes risk was quantified according to the validated German version of the “FINDRISK” diabetes risk score. Machine learning algorithms trained with metabolomics patterns predicted low or high diabetes risk with a balanced accuracy of 63–75%. Similarly, olfactory subtest results predicted the olfactory dysfunction category with a balanced accuracy of 85–94%, occasionally reaching 100%. However, olfactory subtest results failed to improve the prediction of diabetes risk based on metabolomics data, and metabolomics data did not improve the prediction of the olfactory dysfunction category based on olfactory subtest results. Results of the present study suggest that olfactory function is not a useful predictor of diabetes. MDPI 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8584618/ /pubmed/34768493 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214971 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lötsch, Jörn Hähner, Antje Schwarz, Peter E. H. Tselmin, Sergey Hummel, Thomas Machine Learning Refutes Loss of Smell as a Risk Indicator of Diabetes Mellitus |
title | Machine Learning Refutes Loss of Smell as a Risk Indicator of Diabetes Mellitus |
title_full | Machine Learning Refutes Loss of Smell as a Risk Indicator of Diabetes Mellitus |
title_fullStr | Machine Learning Refutes Loss of Smell as a Risk Indicator of Diabetes Mellitus |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine Learning Refutes Loss of Smell as a Risk Indicator of Diabetes Mellitus |
title_short | Machine Learning Refutes Loss of Smell as a Risk Indicator of Diabetes Mellitus |
title_sort | machine learning refutes loss of smell as a risk indicator of diabetes mellitus |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768493 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214971 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lotschjorn machinelearningrefuteslossofsmellasariskindicatorofdiabetesmellitus AT hahnerantje machinelearningrefuteslossofsmellasariskindicatorofdiabetesmellitus AT schwarzpetereh machinelearningrefuteslossofsmellasariskindicatorofdiabetesmellitus AT tselminsergey machinelearningrefuteslossofsmellasariskindicatorofdiabetesmellitus AT hummelthomas machinelearningrefuteslossofsmellasariskindicatorofdiabetesmellitus |