Cargando…

The effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis players

In this study, 90 (51 males, 39 females) tennis players performed single-leg quiet stance and single-leg landing tasks. For the static standing task, center-of pressure (CoP) velocities, amplitudes, frequency and area were calculated. For the landing tasks, time to stabilization as well as dynamic p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kozinc, Žiga, Šarabon, Nejc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34762690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259854
_version_ 1784597512216117248
author Kozinc, Žiga
Šarabon, Nejc
author_facet Kozinc, Žiga
Šarabon, Nejc
author_sort Kozinc, Žiga
collection PubMed
description In this study, 90 (51 males, 39 females) tennis players performed single-leg quiet stance and single-leg landing tasks. For the static standing task, center-of pressure (CoP) velocities, amplitudes, frequency and area were calculated. For the landing tasks, time to stabilization as well as dynamic postural stability index were considered. The analysis of differences between the legs was done based on two methods for a priori determination of leg preference, one based on the preference of kicking a ball and one based on the preference for single-leg jumping. An additional analysis was done based on the leg dominance (determined post hoc), based on the observed performance of the tasks. In case of the classification based on kicking a ball, there was a statistically significantly lower CoP anterior-posterior velocity and anterior-posterior amplitude in static balance task (p ≤ 0.017; 0.17 ≤ d ≤ 0.28) for the preferred leg. The CoP frequency was higher in the preferred leg for both directions (p ≤ 0.002; 0.10 ≤ d ≤ 0.22). For the landing task, CoP medial-lateral time to stabilization was statistically significantly shorter for the preferred leg (0.28 ± 0.38 s) compared to the non-preferred leg (0.47 ± 0.60 s) (p = 0.012; d = 0.38). There were no differences between the legs for the landing task. Moreover, there were no differences between the legs when we used the preference based on jumping for either of the tasks (d ≤ 0.14). The differences between legs in terms of observed dominance were larger than the differences based on the preference, which stresses the need for clear distinction of limb preference and limb dominance in research and practice. Regarding the effect of leg preference, small differences in static balance may exist between the legs (when the preference is based on kicking a ball).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8584696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85846962021-11-12 The effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis players Kozinc, Žiga Šarabon, Nejc PLoS One Research Article In this study, 90 (51 males, 39 females) tennis players performed single-leg quiet stance and single-leg landing tasks. For the static standing task, center-of pressure (CoP) velocities, amplitudes, frequency and area were calculated. For the landing tasks, time to stabilization as well as dynamic postural stability index were considered. The analysis of differences between the legs was done based on two methods for a priori determination of leg preference, one based on the preference of kicking a ball and one based on the preference for single-leg jumping. An additional analysis was done based on the leg dominance (determined post hoc), based on the observed performance of the tasks. In case of the classification based on kicking a ball, there was a statistically significantly lower CoP anterior-posterior velocity and anterior-posterior amplitude in static balance task (p ≤ 0.017; 0.17 ≤ d ≤ 0.28) for the preferred leg. The CoP frequency was higher in the preferred leg for both directions (p ≤ 0.002; 0.10 ≤ d ≤ 0.22). For the landing task, CoP medial-lateral time to stabilization was statistically significantly shorter for the preferred leg (0.28 ± 0.38 s) compared to the non-preferred leg (0.47 ± 0.60 s) (p = 0.012; d = 0.38). There were no differences between the legs for the landing task. Moreover, there were no differences between the legs when we used the preference based on jumping for either of the tasks (d ≤ 0.14). The differences between legs in terms of observed dominance were larger than the differences based on the preference, which stresses the need for clear distinction of limb preference and limb dominance in research and practice. Regarding the effect of leg preference, small differences in static balance may exist between the legs (when the preference is based on kicking a ball). Public Library of Science 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8584696/ /pubmed/34762690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259854 Text en © 2021 Kozinc, Šarabon https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kozinc, Žiga
Šarabon, Nejc
The effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis players
title The effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis players
title_full The effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis players
title_fullStr The effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis players
title_full_unstemmed The effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis players
title_short The effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis players
title_sort effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis players
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34762690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259854
work_keys_str_mv AT kozincziga theeffectsoflegpreferenceandlegdominanceonstaticanddynamicbalanceperformanceinhighlytrainedtennisplayers
AT sarabonnejc theeffectsoflegpreferenceandlegdominanceonstaticanddynamicbalanceperformanceinhighlytrainedtennisplayers
AT kozincziga effectsoflegpreferenceandlegdominanceonstaticanddynamicbalanceperformanceinhighlytrainedtennisplayers
AT sarabonnejc effectsoflegpreferenceandlegdominanceonstaticanddynamicbalanceperformanceinhighlytrainedtennisplayers