Cargando…

Predictive Value of Baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT for Response to Systemic Therapy in Patients with Advanced Melanoma

Background/Aim: To evaluate the association between baseline [18F]FDG-PET/CT tumor burden parameters and disease progression rate after first-line target therapy or immunotherapy in advanced melanoma patients. Materials and Methods: Forty four melanoma patients, who underwent [18F]FDG-PET/CT before...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liberini, Virginia, Rubatto, Marco, Mimmo, Riccardo, Passera, Roberto, Ceci, Francesco, Fava, Paolo, Tonella, Luca, Polverari, Giulia, Lesca, Adriana, Bellò, Marilena, Arena, Vincenzo, Ribero, Simone, Quaglino, Pietro, Deandreis, Désirée
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768517
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214994
_version_ 1784597539004088320
author Liberini, Virginia
Rubatto, Marco
Mimmo, Riccardo
Passera, Roberto
Ceci, Francesco
Fava, Paolo
Tonella, Luca
Polverari, Giulia
Lesca, Adriana
Bellò, Marilena
Arena, Vincenzo
Ribero, Simone
Quaglino, Pietro
Deandreis, Désirée
author_facet Liberini, Virginia
Rubatto, Marco
Mimmo, Riccardo
Passera, Roberto
Ceci, Francesco
Fava, Paolo
Tonella, Luca
Polverari, Giulia
Lesca, Adriana
Bellò, Marilena
Arena, Vincenzo
Ribero, Simone
Quaglino, Pietro
Deandreis, Désirée
author_sort Liberini, Virginia
collection PubMed
description Background/Aim: To evaluate the association between baseline [18F]FDG-PET/CT tumor burden parameters and disease progression rate after first-line target therapy or immunotherapy in advanced melanoma patients. Materials and Methods: Forty four melanoma patients, who underwent [18F]FDG-PET/CT before first-line target therapy (28/44) or immunotherapy (16/44), were retrospectively analyzed. Whole-body and per-district metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated. Therapy response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 on CT scan at 3 (early) and 12 (late) months. PET parameters were compared using the Mann–Whitney test. Optimal cut-offs for predicting progression were defined using the ROC curve. PFS and OS were studied using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results: Median (IQR) MTVwb and TLGwb were 13.1 mL and 72.4, respectively. Non-responder patients were 38/44, 26/28 and 12/16 at early evaluation, and 33/44, 21/28 and 12/16 at late evaluation in the whole-cohort, target, and immunotherapy subgroup, respectively. At late evaluation, MTVbone and TLGbone were higher in non-responders compared to responder patients (all p < 0.037) in the whole-cohort and target subgroup and MTVwb and TLGwb (all p < 0.022) in target subgroup. No significant differences were found for the immunotherapy subgroup. No metabolic parameters were able to predict PFS. Controversially, MTVlfn, TLGlfn, MTVsoft + lfn, TLGsoft + lfn, MTVwb and TLGwb were significantly associated (all p < 0.05) with OS in both the whole-cohort and target therapy subgroup. Conclusions: Higher values of whole-body and bone metabolic parameters were correlated with poorer outcome, while higher values of whole-body, lymph node and soft tissue metabolic parameters were correlated with OS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8584809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85848092021-11-12 Predictive Value of Baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT for Response to Systemic Therapy in Patients with Advanced Melanoma Liberini, Virginia Rubatto, Marco Mimmo, Riccardo Passera, Roberto Ceci, Francesco Fava, Paolo Tonella, Luca Polverari, Giulia Lesca, Adriana Bellò, Marilena Arena, Vincenzo Ribero, Simone Quaglino, Pietro Deandreis, Désirée J Clin Med Article Background/Aim: To evaluate the association between baseline [18F]FDG-PET/CT tumor burden parameters and disease progression rate after first-line target therapy or immunotherapy in advanced melanoma patients. Materials and Methods: Forty four melanoma patients, who underwent [18F]FDG-PET/CT before first-line target therapy (28/44) or immunotherapy (16/44), were retrospectively analyzed. Whole-body and per-district metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated. Therapy response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 on CT scan at 3 (early) and 12 (late) months. PET parameters were compared using the Mann–Whitney test. Optimal cut-offs for predicting progression were defined using the ROC curve. PFS and OS were studied using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results: Median (IQR) MTVwb and TLGwb were 13.1 mL and 72.4, respectively. Non-responder patients were 38/44, 26/28 and 12/16 at early evaluation, and 33/44, 21/28 and 12/16 at late evaluation in the whole-cohort, target, and immunotherapy subgroup, respectively. At late evaluation, MTVbone and TLGbone were higher in non-responders compared to responder patients (all p < 0.037) in the whole-cohort and target subgroup and MTVwb and TLGwb (all p < 0.022) in target subgroup. No significant differences were found for the immunotherapy subgroup. No metabolic parameters were able to predict PFS. Controversially, MTVlfn, TLGlfn, MTVsoft + lfn, TLGsoft + lfn, MTVwb and TLGwb were significantly associated (all p < 0.05) with OS in both the whole-cohort and target therapy subgroup. Conclusions: Higher values of whole-body and bone metabolic parameters were correlated with poorer outcome, while higher values of whole-body, lymph node and soft tissue metabolic parameters were correlated with OS. MDPI 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8584809/ /pubmed/34768517 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214994 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liberini, Virginia
Rubatto, Marco
Mimmo, Riccardo
Passera, Roberto
Ceci, Francesco
Fava, Paolo
Tonella, Luca
Polverari, Giulia
Lesca, Adriana
Bellò, Marilena
Arena, Vincenzo
Ribero, Simone
Quaglino, Pietro
Deandreis, Désirée
Predictive Value of Baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT for Response to Systemic Therapy in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
title Predictive Value of Baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT for Response to Systemic Therapy in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
title_full Predictive Value of Baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT for Response to Systemic Therapy in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
title_fullStr Predictive Value of Baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT for Response to Systemic Therapy in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Predictive Value of Baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT for Response to Systemic Therapy in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
title_short Predictive Value of Baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT for Response to Systemic Therapy in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
title_sort predictive value of baseline [18f]fdg pet/ct for response to systemic therapy in patients with advanced melanoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768517
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214994
work_keys_str_mv AT liberinivirginia predictivevalueofbaseline18ffdgpetctforresponsetosystemictherapyinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT rubattomarco predictivevalueofbaseline18ffdgpetctforresponsetosystemictherapyinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT mimmoriccardo predictivevalueofbaseline18ffdgpetctforresponsetosystemictherapyinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT passeraroberto predictivevalueofbaseline18ffdgpetctforresponsetosystemictherapyinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT cecifrancesco predictivevalueofbaseline18ffdgpetctforresponsetosystemictherapyinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT favapaolo predictivevalueofbaseline18ffdgpetctforresponsetosystemictherapyinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT tonellaluca predictivevalueofbaseline18ffdgpetctforresponsetosystemictherapyinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT polverarigiulia predictivevalueofbaseline18ffdgpetctforresponsetosystemictherapyinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT lescaadriana predictivevalueofbaseline18ffdgpetctforresponsetosystemictherapyinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT bellomarilena predictivevalueofbaseline18ffdgpetctforresponsetosystemictherapyinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT arenavincenzo predictivevalueofbaseline18ffdgpetctforresponsetosystemictherapyinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT riberosimone predictivevalueofbaseline18ffdgpetctforresponsetosystemictherapyinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT quaglinopietro predictivevalueofbaseline18ffdgpetctforresponsetosystemictherapyinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT deandreisdesiree predictivevalueofbaseline18ffdgpetctforresponsetosystemictherapyinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma