Cargando…
Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires
Background. This study aimed to determine the kinetic frictional force (FF) of the recently produced TiNbTaZrO (Gummetal) orthodontic wire and compare it to the widely used wires of stainless steel (SS), nickel-titanium (NiTi), cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and titanium-molybdenum (TiMo) alloys. Methods. F...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34771762 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216233 |
_version_ | 1784597559054958592 |
---|---|
author | Schmeidl, Krzysztof Wieczorowski, Michal Grocholewicz, Katarzyna Mendak, Michal Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna |
author_facet | Schmeidl, Krzysztof Wieczorowski, Michal Grocholewicz, Katarzyna Mendak, Michal Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna |
author_sort | Schmeidl, Krzysztof |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. This study aimed to determine the kinetic frictional force (FF) of the recently produced TiNbTaZrO (Gummetal) orthodontic wire and compare it to the widely used wires of stainless steel (SS), nickel-titanium (NiTi), cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and titanium-molybdenum (TiMo) alloys. Methods. Five types of 0.016″ × 0.022″ wires were ligated with elastic ligatures to 0.018″ × 0.025″ SS brackets. The dynamic FFs between the brackets and ligated wires were measured utilizing a specialized tensile tester machine. Prior sample sizes for different archwires were conducted using power analysis for the general linear models. The existence of significant differences in FF between examined materials was initially confirmed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with further evidence of pairwise differences by Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference test. Results. The pairwise differences between means of kinetic FFs for NiTi, CoCr, and Gummetal wires were not statistically significant (adjusted p-value > 0.05). Stainless steel alloy presented the lowest FF values significantly different from other groups (adjusted p-value < 0.05). On the contrary, TiMo wires showed significantly greater FFs (adjusted p-value < 0.05) than other alloys. Conclusions. Gummetal orthodontic wire exhibits similar frictional resistance as NiTi and CoCr wires. Bendable TiNbTaZrO wire might be used for sliding mechanics due to its favorable frictional properties. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8584894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85848942021-11-12 Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires Schmeidl, Krzysztof Wieczorowski, Michal Grocholewicz, Katarzyna Mendak, Michal Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna Materials (Basel) Article Background. This study aimed to determine the kinetic frictional force (FF) of the recently produced TiNbTaZrO (Gummetal) orthodontic wire and compare it to the widely used wires of stainless steel (SS), nickel-titanium (NiTi), cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and titanium-molybdenum (TiMo) alloys. Methods. Five types of 0.016″ × 0.022″ wires were ligated with elastic ligatures to 0.018″ × 0.025″ SS brackets. The dynamic FFs between the brackets and ligated wires were measured utilizing a specialized tensile tester machine. Prior sample sizes for different archwires were conducted using power analysis for the general linear models. The existence of significant differences in FF between examined materials was initially confirmed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with further evidence of pairwise differences by Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference test. Results. The pairwise differences between means of kinetic FFs for NiTi, CoCr, and Gummetal wires were not statistically significant (adjusted p-value > 0.05). Stainless steel alloy presented the lowest FF values significantly different from other groups (adjusted p-value < 0.05). On the contrary, TiMo wires showed significantly greater FFs (adjusted p-value < 0.05) than other alloys. Conclusions. Gummetal orthodontic wire exhibits similar frictional resistance as NiTi and CoCr wires. Bendable TiNbTaZrO wire might be used for sliding mechanics due to its favorable frictional properties. MDPI 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8584894/ /pubmed/34771762 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216233 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Schmeidl, Krzysztof Wieczorowski, Michal Grocholewicz, Katarzyna Mendak, Michal Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires |
title | Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires |
title_full | Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires |
title_fullStr | Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires |
title_full_unstemmed | Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires |
title_short | Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires |
title_sort | frictional properties of the tinbtazro orthodontic wire—a laboratory comparison to popular archwires |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34771762 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216233 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmeidlkrzysztof frictionalpropertiesofthetinbtazroorthodonticwirealaboratorycomparisontopopulararchwires AT wieczorowskimichal frictionalpropertiesofthetinbtazroorthodonticwirealaboratorycomparisontopopulararchwires AT grocholewiczkatarzyna frictionalpropertiesofthetinbtazroorthodonticwirealaboratorycomparisontopopulararchwires AT mendakmichal frictionalpropertiesofthetinbtazroorthodonticwirealaboratorycomparisontopopulararchwires AT janiszewskaolszowskajoanna frictionalpropertiesofthetinbtazroorthodonticwirealaboratorycomparisontopopulararchwires |