Cargando…

Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires

Background. This study aimed to determine the kinetic frictional force (FF) of the recently produced TiNbTaZrO (Gummetal) orthodontic wire and compare it to the widely used wires of stainless steel (SS), nickel-titanium (NiTi), cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and titanium-molybdenum (TiMo) alloys. Methods. F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmeidl, Krzysztof, Wieczorowski, Michal, Grocholewicz, Katarzyna, Mendak, Michal, Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34771762
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216233
_version_ 1784597559054958592
author Schmeidl, Krzysztof
Wieczorowski, Michal
Grocholewicz, Katarzyna
Mendak, Michal
Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna
author_facet Schmeidl, Krzysztof
Wieczorowski, Michal
Grocholewicz, Katarzyna
Mendak, Michal
Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna
author_sort Schmeidl, Krzysztof
collection PubMed
description Background. This study aimed to determine the kinetic frictional force (FF) of the recently produced TiNbTaZrO (Gummetal) orthodontic wire and compare it to the widely used wires of stainless steel (SS), nickel-titanium (NiTi), cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and titanium-molybdenum (TiMo) alloys. Methods. Five types of 0.016″ × 0.022″ wires were ligated with elastic ligatures to 0.018″ × 0.025″ SS brackets. The dynamic FFs between the brackets and ligated wires were measured utilizing a specialized tensile tester machine. Prior sample sizes for different archwires were conducted using power analysis for the general linear models. The existence of significant differences in FF between examined materials was initially confirmed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with further evidence of pairwise differences by Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference test. Results. The pairwise differences between means of kinetic FFs for NiTi, CoCr, and Gummetal wires were not statistically significant (adjusted p-value > 0.05). Stainless steel alloy presented the lowest FF values significantly different from other groups (adjusted p-value < 0.05). On the contrary, TiMo wires showed significantly greater FFs (adjusted p-value < 0.05) than other alloys. Conclusions. Gummetal orthodontic wire exhibits similar frictional resistance as NiTi and CoCr wires. Bendable TiNbTaZrO wire might be used for sliding mechanics due to its favorable frictional properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8584894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85848942021-11-12 Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires Schmeidl, Krzysztof Wieczorowski, Michal Grocholewicz, Katarzyna Mendak, Michal Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna Materials (Basel) Article Background. This study aimed to determine the kinetic frictional force (FF) of the recently produced TiNbTaZrO (Gummetal) orthodontic wire and compare it to the widely used wires of stainless steel (SS), nickel-titanium (NiTi), cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and titanium-molybdenum (TiMo) alloys. Methods. Five types of 0.016″ × 0.022″ wires were ligated with elastic ligatures to 0.018″ × 0.025″ SS brackets. The dynamic FFs between the brackets and ligated wires were measured utilizing a specialized tensile tester machine. Prior sample sizes for different archwires were conducted using power analysis for the general linear models. The existence of significant differences in FF between examined materials was initially confirmed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with further evidence of pairwise differences by Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference test. Results. The pairwise differences between means of kinetic FFs for NiTi, CoCr, and Gummetal wires were not statistically significant (adjusted p-value > 0.05). Stainless steel alloy presented the lowest FF values significantly different from other groups (adjusted p-value < 0.05). On the contrary, TiMo wires showed significantly greater FFs (adjusted p-value < 0.05) than other alloys. Conclusions. Gummetal orthodontic wire exhibits similar frictional resistance as NiTi and CoCr wires. Bendable TiNbTaZrO wire might be used for sliding mechanics due to its favorable frictional properties. MDPI 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8584894/ /pubmed/34771762 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216233 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schmeidl, Krzysztof
Wieczorowski, Michal
Grocholewicz, Katarzyna
Mendak, Michal
Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna
Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires
title Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires
title_full Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires
title_fullStr Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires
title_full_unstemmed Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires
title_short Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires
title_sort frictional properties of the tinbtazro orthodontic wire—a laboratory comparison to popular archwires
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34771762
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216233
work_keys_str_mv AT schmeidlkrzysztof frictionalpropertiesofthetinbtazroorthodonticwirealaboratorycomparisontopopulararchwires
AT wieczorowskimichal frictionalpropertiesofthetinbtazroorthodonticwirealaboratorycomparisontopopulararchwires
AT grocholewiczkatarzyna frictionalpropertiesofthetinbtazroorthodonticwirealaboratorycomparisontopopulararchwires
AT mendakmichal frictionalpropertiesofthetinbtazroorthodonticwirealaboratorycomparisontopopulararchwires
AT janiszewskaolszowskajoanna frictionalpropertiesofthetinbtazroorthodonticwirealaboratorycomparisontopopulararchwires