Cargando…

Sphinkeeper Procedure for Treating Severe Faecal Incontinence—A Prospective Cohort Study

(1) Background: The Sphinkeeper implantation for faecal incontinence (FI) is a novel surgical procedure with limited data on its clinical efficacy. Therefore, we aimed to assess the functional outcome following Sphinkeeper surgery in patients with refractory FI. (2) Methods: Between 2018 and 2020, e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dawoud, Christopher, Bender, Leonhard, Widmann, Kerstin Melanie, Harpain, Felix, Riss, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768486
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214965
_version_ 1784597565221634048
author Dawoud, Christopher
Bender, Leonhard
Widmann, Kerstin Melanie
Harpain, Felix
Riss, Stefan
author_facet Dawoud, Christopher
Bender, Leonhard
Widmann, Kerstin Melanie
Harpain, Felix
Riss, Stefan
author_sort Dawoud, Christopher
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: The Sphinkeeper implantation for faecal incontinence (FI) is a novel surgical procedure with limited data on its clinical efficacy. Therefore, we aimed to assess the functional outcome following Sphinkeeper surgery in patients with refractory FI. (2) Methods: Between 2018 and 2020, eleven consecutive patients (9 female) with FI met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled for surgery. Functional outcome and quality of life were evaluated by standard questionnaires pre- and post-surgery. Migration of protheses was demonstrated by 3D endoanal ultrasound. The median follow-up time was eight months (range 3–18 months). (3) Results: The median age was 75 years (range 46–89 years) with a median BMI of 27.4 (range 21.2–30.1). The median number of implanted prostheses per intervention was nine (range 9–10). We found no intraoperative or early postoperative complications. After two months, two prostheses in one patient had to be removed due to pain at the perianal skin site. The median St. Mark’s incontinence score decreased significantly from 22 to 13 points (p = 0.008). The SF-12 showed a significant improvement (35.9 versus 46.3) after surgery (p = 0.028). A migration of at least one prosthesis was observed in ten patients (91%). Six (60%) prostheses were found at the same level in another ten patients. (4) Conclusion: Sphinkeeper implantation is a promising surgical technique for patients with severe FI. The complication rate is low, and short-term functional improvement can be achieved even in severe forms of FI. Migration of implants commonly occurs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8584920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85849202021-11-12 Sphinkeeper Procedure for Treating Severe Faecal Incontinence—A Prospective Cohort Study Dawoud, Christopher Bender, Leonhard Widmann, Kerstin Melanie Harpain, Felix Riss, Stefan J Clin Med Article (1) Background: The Sphinkeeper implantation for faecal incontinence (FI) is a novel surgical procedure with limited data on its clinical efficacy. Therefore, we aimed to assess the functional outcome following Sphinkeeper surgery in patients with refractory FI. (2) Methods: Between 2018 and 2020, eleven consecutive patients (9 female) with FI met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled for surgery. Functional outcome and quality of life were evaluated by standard questionnaires pre- and post-surgery. Migration of protheses was demonstrated by 3D endoanal ultrasound. The median follow-up time was eight months (range 3–18 months). (3) Results: The median age was 75 years (range 46–89 years) with a median BMI of 27.4 (range 21.2–30.1). The median number of implanted prostheses per intervention was nine (range 9–10). We found no intraoperative or early postoperative complications. After two months, two prostheses in one patient had to be removed due to pain at the perianal skin site. The median St. Mark’s incontinence score decreased significantly from 22 to 13 points (p = 0.008). The SF-12 showed a significant improvement (35.9 versus 46.3) after surgery (p = 0.028). A migration of at least one prosthesis was observed in ten patients (91%). Six (60%) prostheses were found at the same level in another ten patients. (4) Conclusion: Sphinkeeper implantation is a promising surgical technique for patients with severe FI. The complication rate is low, and short-term functional improvement can be achieved even in severe forms of FI. Migration of implants commonly occurs. MDPI 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8584920/ /pubmed/34768486 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214965 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dawoud, Christopher
Bender, Leonhard
Widmann, Kerstin Melanie
Harpain, Felix
Riss, Stefan
Sphinkeeper Procedure for Treating Severe Faecal Incontinence—A Prospective Cohort Study
title Sphinkeeper Procedure for Treating Severe Faecal Incontinence—A Prospective Cohort Study
title_full Sphinkeeper Procedure for Treating Severe Faecal Incontinence—A Prospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Sphinkeeper Procedure for Treating Severe Faecal Incontinence—A Prospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Sphinkeeper Procedure for Treating Severe Faecal Incontinence—A Prospective Cohort Study
title_short Sphinkeeper Procedure for Treating Severe Faecal Incontinence—A Prospective Cohort Study
title_sort sphinkeeper procedure for treating severe faecal incontinence—a prospective cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768486
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214965
work_keys_str_mv AT dawoudchristopher sphinkeeperprocedurefortreatingseverefaecalincontinenceaprospectivecohortstudy
AT benderleonhard sphinkeeperprocedurefortreatingseverefaecalincontinenceaprospectivecohortstudy
AT widmannkerstinmelanie sphinkeeperprocedurefortreatingseverefaecalincontinenceaprospectivecohortstudy
AT harpainfelix sphinkeeperprocedurefortreatingseverefaecalincontinenceaprospectivecohortstudy
AT rissstefan sphinkeeperprocedurefortreatingseverefaecalincontinenceaprospectivecohortstudy