Cargando…

Allografts for Skin Closure during In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model

Objectives: Use of off-label tissue graft materials, such as acellular dermal matrix (ADM), for in utero repair of severe spina bifida (SB), where primary skin layer closure is not possible, is associated with poor neurological outcomes. The cryopreserved human umbilical cord (HUC) patch has regener...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mann, Lovepreet K., Won, Jong Hak, Patel, Rajan, Bergh, Eric P., Garnett, Jeannine, Bhattacharjee, Meenakshi B., Narayana, Ponnada A., Jain, Ranu, Fletcher, Stephen A., Lai, Dejian, Papanna, Ramesha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768448
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214928
_version_ 1784597581563691008
author Mann, Lovepreet K.
Won, Jong Hak
Patel, Rajan
Bergh, Eric P.
Garnett, Jeannine
Bhattacharjee, Meenakshi B.
Narayana, Ponnada A.
Jain, Ranu
Fletcher, Stephen A.
Lai, Dejian
Papanna, Ramesha
author_facet Mann, Lovepreet K.
Won, Jong Hak
Patel, Rajan
Bergh, Eric P.
Garnett, Jeannine
Bhattacharjee, Meenakshi B.
Narayana, Ponnada A.
Jain, Ranu
Fletcher, Stephen A.
Lai, Dejian
Papanna, Ramesha
author_sort Mann, Lovepreet K.
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Use of off-label tissue graft materials, such as acellular dermal matrix (ADM), for in utero repair of severe spina bifida (SB), where primary skin layer closure is not possible, is associated with poor neurological outcomes. The cryopreserved human umbilical cord (HUC) patch has regenerative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-scarring properties, and provides watertight SB repair. We tested the hypothesis that the HUC is a superior skin patch to ADM for reducing inflammation at the repair site and preserving spinal cord function. Methods: In timed-pregnant ewes with twins, on gestational day (GD) 75, spina bifida was created without a myelotomy (functional model). On GD 95, repair was performed using HUC vs. ADM patches (randomly assigned) by suturing them to the skin edges. Additionally, full thickness skin closure as a primary skin closure (PSC) served as a positive control. Delivery was performed on GD 140, followed by blinded to treatment neurological assessments of the lambs using the Texas Spinal Cord Injury Scale (TSCIS) for gait, proprioception, and nociception. Lambs without spina bifida were used as controls (CTL). Ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging of spines at the repair site were performed, followed by quantitative pathological assessments. Histological assessments (blinded) included Masson’s trichrome, and immunofluorescence for myeloperoxidase (MPO; neutrophils) and for reactive astrocytes (inflammation) by co-staining vimentin and GFAP. Results: The combined hind limbs’ TSCIS was significantly higher in the HUC group than in ADM and PSC groups, p = 0.007. Both ADM and PSC groups exhibited loss of proprioception and mild to moderate ataxia compared to controls. MRI showed increased pathological findings in the PSC group when compared to the HUC group, p = 0.045. Histologically, the meningeal layer was thickened (inflammation) by 2–3 fold in ADM and PSC groups when compared to HUC and CTL groups, p = 0.01. There was lower MPO positive cells in the HUC group than in the ADM group, p = 0.018. Posterior column astrocyte activation was increased in ADM and PSC lambs compared to HUC lambs, p = 0.03. Conclusion: The HUC as a skin patch for in utero spina bifida repair preserves spinal cord function by reducing underlying inflammation when compared to ADM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8584988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85849882021-11-12 Allografts for Skin Closure during In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model Mann, Lovepreet K. Won, Jong Hak Patel, Rajan Bergh, Eric P. Garnett, Jeannine Bhattacharjee, Meenakshi B. Narayana, Ponnada A. Jain, Ranu Fletcher, Stephen A. Lai, Dejian Papanna, Ramesha J Clin Med Article Objectives: Use of off-label tissue graft materials, such as acellular dermal matrix (ADM), for in utero repair of severe spina bifida (SB), where primary skin layer closure is not possible, is associated with poor neurological outcomes. The cryopreserved human umbilical cord (HUC) patch has regenerative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-scarring properties, and provides watertight SB repair. We tested the hypothesis that the HUC is a superior skin patch to ADM for reducing inflammation at the repair site and preserving spinal cord function. Methods: In timed-pregnant ewes with twins, on gestational day (GD) 75, spina bifida was created without a myelotomy (functional model). On GD 95, repair was performed using HUC vs. ADM patches (randomly assigned) by suturing them to the skin edges. Additionally, full thickness skin closure as a primary skin closure (PSC) served as a positive control. Delivery was performed on GD 140, followed by blinded to treatment neurological assessments of the lambs using the Texas Spinal Cord Injury Scale (TSCIS) for gait, proprioception, and nociception. Lambs without spina bifida were used as controls (CTL). Ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging of spines at the repair site were performed, followed by quantitative pathological assessments. Histological assessments (blinded) included Masson’s trichrome, and immunofluorescence for myeloperoxidase (MPO; neutrophils) and for reactive astrocytes (inflammation) by co-staining vimentin and GFAP. Results: The combined hind limbs’ TSCIS was significantly higher in the HUC group than in ADM and PSC groups, p = 0.007. Both ADM and PSC groups exhibited loss of proprioception and mild to moderate ataxia compared to controls. MRI showed increased pathological findings in the PSC group when compared to the HUC group, p = 0.045. Histologically, the meningeal layer was thickened (inflammation) by 2–3 fold in ADM and PSC groups when compared to HUC and CTL groups, p = 0.01. There was lower MPO positive cells in the HUC group than in the ADM group, p = 0.018. Posterior column astrocyte activation was increased in ADM and PSC lambs compared to HUC lambs, p = 0.03. Conclusion: The HUC as a skin patch for in utero spina bifida repair preserves spinal cord function by reducing underlying inflammation when compared to ADM. MDPI 2021-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8584988/ /pubmed/34768448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214928 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mann, Lovepreet K.
Won, Jong Hak
Patel, Rajan
Bergh, Eric P.
Garnett, Jeannine
Bhattacharjee, Meenakshi B.
Narayana, Ponnada A.
Jain, Ranu
Fletcher, Stephen A.
Lai, Dejian
Papanna, Ramesha
Allografts for Skin Closure during In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model
title Allografts for Skin Closure during In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model
title_full Allografts for Skin Closure during In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model
title_fullStr Allografts for Skin Closure during In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model
title_full_unstemmed Allografts for Skin Closure during In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model
title_short Allografts for Skin Closure during In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model
title_sort allografts for skin closure during in utero spina bifida repair in a sheep model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768448
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214928
work_keys_str_mv AT mannlovepreetk allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT wonjonghak allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT patelrajan allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT berghericp allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT garnettjeannine allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT bhattacharjeemeenakshib allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT narayanaponnadaa allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT jainranu allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT fletcherstephena allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT laidejian allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT papannaramesha allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel