Cargando…

Progressive Comparison of Density Assessment of Alveolar Bone Graft in Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft

(1) Background: Continuing to observe the grafted bone mineral density (BMD) is essential to ensure the success of alveolar bone grafting (ABG) in patients with cleft lip and palate. This study elaborates on three methods that can be used to evaluate the progressive BMD. (2) Methods: Forty patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Pin-Ru, Lin, Yu-Ching, Pai, Betty Chien-Jung, Tseng, Hsiao-Jung, Lo, Lun-Jou, Chou, Pang-Yun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8585053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215143
_version_ 1784597597912039424
author Chen, Pin-Ru
Lin, Yu-Ching
Pai, Betty Chien-Jung
Tseng, Hsiao-Jung
Lo, Lun-Jou
Chou, Pang-Yun
author_facet Chen, Pin-Ru
Lin, Yu-Ching
Pai, Betty Chien-Jung
Tseng, Hsiao-Jung
Lo, Lun-Jou
Chou, Pang-Yun
author_sort Chen, Pin-Ru
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Continuing to observe the grafted bone mineral density (BMD) is essential to ensure the success of alveolar bone grafting (ABG) in patients with cleft lip and palate. This study elaborates on three methods that can be used to evaluate the progressive BMD. (2) Methods: Forty patients with unilateral or bilateral clefts receiving ABG were enrolled. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken at 6 months (T1) and 2 years (T2) postoperatively. In CBCT, measurements were obtained on three different planes using the circle located 1 mm from the adjacent teeth (Method A), the largest circle within the defect (Method B), or the central circle with a diameter of 2 mm (Method C). The BMD was the average density of the three planes and was adjusted by pogonion density. Bland–Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement of each method. Inter-rater reliability was confirmed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). (3) Results: For Method A, B, and C, the mean-adjusted BMD (BMD/pogonion density, BMD(a)) was 17.44%, 17.88%, and 17.69%, respectively, at T1 (p = 0.495), and 22.51%, 22.87%, and 22.74%, respectively, at T2 (p = 0.690); the density enhancement rates were 40.54%, 38.92%, and 43.15% (p = 0.382). Significant differences between the BMD(a) at T1 and T2 were observed (p < 0.001, <0.001, and 0.001, for Method A, B, and C, respectively). The volume of the grafted tissue remained stable during T1 and T2, and no significant correlation between density enhancement rate and volume loss was observed. (4) Conclusions: A significant increase in the BMD of grafted tissue was observed in the 2-year postoperative follow-up. The three methods for measuring BMD(a) via CBCT can be applied in post-ABG evaluations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8585053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85850532021-11-12 Progressive Comparison of Density Assessment of Alveolar Bone Graft in Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft Chen, Pin-Ru Lin, Yu-Ching Pai, Betty Chien-Jung Tseng, Hsiao-Jung Lo, Lun-Jou Chou, Pang-Yun J Clin Med Article (1) Background: Continuing to observe the grafted bone mineral density (BMD) is essential to ensure the success of alveolar bone grafting (ABG) in patients with cleft lip and palate. This study elaborates on three methods that can be used to evaluate the progressive BMD. (2) Methods: Forty patients with unilateral or bilateral clefts receiving ABG were enrolled. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken at 6 months (T1) and 2 years (T2) postoperatively. In CBCT, measurements were obtained on three different planes using the circle located 1 mm from the adjacent teeth (Method A), the largest circle within the defect (Method B), or the central circle with a diameter of 2 mm (Method C). The BMD was the average density of the three planes and was adjusted by pogonion density. Bland–Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement of each method. Inter-rater reliability was confirmed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). (3) Results: For Method A, B, and C, the mean-adjusted BMD (BMD/pogonion density, BMD(a)) was 17.44%, 17.88%, and 17.69%, respectively, at T1 (p = 0.495), and 22.51%, 22.87%, and 22.74%, respectively, at T2 (p = 0.690); the density enhancement rates were 40.54%, 38.92%, and 43.15% (p = 0.382). Significant differences between the BMD(a) at T1 and T2 were observed (p < 0.001, <0.001, and 0.001, for Method A, B, and C, respectively). The volume of the grafted tissue remained stable during T1 and T2, and no significant correlation between density enhancement rate and volume loss was observed. (4) Conclusions: A significant increase in the BMD of grafted tissue was observed in the 2-year postoperative follow-up. The three methods for measuring BMD(a) via CBCT can be applied in post-ABG evaluations. MDPI 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8585053/ /pubmed/34768663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215143 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Pin-Ru
Lin, Yu-Ching
Pai, Betty Chien-Jung
Tseng, Hsiao-Jung
Lo, Lun-Jou
Chou, Pang-Yun
Progressive Comparison of Density Assessment of Alveolar Bone Graft in Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft
title Progressive Comparison of Density Assessment of Alveolar Bone Graft in Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft
title_full Progressive Comparison of Density Assessment of Alveolar Bone Graft in Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft
title_fullStr Progressive Comparison of Density Assessment of Alveolar Bone Graft in Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft
title_full_unstemmed Progressive Comparison of Density Assessment of Alveolar Bone Graft in Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft
title_short Progressive Comparison of Density Assessment of Alveolar Bone Graft in Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft
title_sort progressive comparison of density assessment of alveolar bone graft in patients with unilateral and bilateral cleft
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8585053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215143
work_keys_str_mv AT chenpinru progressivecomparisonofdensityassessmentofalveolarbonegraftinpatientswithunilateralandbilateralcleft
AT linyuching progressivecomparisonofdensityassessmentofalveolarbonegraftinpatientswithunilateralandbilateralcleft
AT paibettychienjung progressivecomparisonofdensityassessmentofalveolarbonegraftinpatientswithunilateralandbilateralcleft
AT tsenghsiaojung progressivecomparisonofdensityassessmentofalveolarbonegraftinpatientswithunilateralandbilateralcleft
AT lolunjou progressivecomparisonofdensityassessmentofalveolarbonegraftinpatientswithunilateralandbilateralcleft
AT choupangyun progressivecomparisonofdensityassessmentofalveolarbonegraftinpatientswithunilateralandbilateralcleft