Cargando…

Performance Comparison of Geodrain Drainage and Gravel Drainage Layers Embedded in a Horizontal Plane

Drainage materials are widely used, among other uses, in the construction of landfills. Regulations require a drainage layer in the base and a covering for the landfill. The implementation of a gravel drain requires a lot of material and financial outlays. New geocomposite materials are an alternati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cholewa, Mariusz, Plesiński, Karol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8585300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34771846
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216321
_version_ 1784597657394610176
author Cholewa, Mariusz
Plesiński, Karol
author_facet Cholewa, Mariusz
Plesiński, Karol
author_sort Cholewa, Mariusz
collection PubMed
description Drainage materials are widely used, among other uses, in the construction of landfills. Regulations require a drainage layer in the base and a covering for the landfill. The implementation of a gravel drain requires a lot of material and financial outlays. New geocomposite materials are an alternative, and facilitate construction. The aim of the research was to compare the drainage properties of the Pozidrain 7S250D/NW8 geocomposite and gravel drainage. The model test was performed on a specially prepared test stand. The research was carried out for model #1, in which the gravel drainage was built. Model #2 had a drainage geocomposite built into it. The test results show the values of the volumetric flow rate for geodrains, with a maximum value of 40 dm(3)·min(−1). For the gravel layer, values of up to 140 dm(3)·min(−1) were recorded. Another parameter recorded during the damming of water by the embankment was the speed of water suction by the geosynthetic and gravel drainage; the values were 0.067 and 0.024 m(3)·s(−1), respectively. The efficiency of water drainage through the geocomposite was sufficient. It is possible to use the slopes of the landfill for drainage, which will reduce material and financial outlays.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8585300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85853002021-11-12 Performance Comparison of Geodrain Drainage and Gravel Drainage Layers Embedded in a Horizontal Plane Cholewa, Mariusz Plesiński, Karol Materials (Basel) Article Drainage materials are widely used, among other uses, in the construction of landfills. Regulations require a drainage layer in the base and a covering for the landfill. The implementation of a gravel drain requires a lot of material and financial outlays. New geocomposite materials are an alternative, and facilitate construction. The aim of the research was to compare the drainage properties of the Pozidrain 7S250D/NW8 geocomposite and gravel drainage. The model test was performed on a specially prepared test stand. The research was carried out for model #1, in which the gravel drainage was built. Model #2 had a drainage geocomposite built into it. The test results show the values of the volumetric flow rate for geodrains, with a maximum value of 40 dm(3)·min(−1). For the gravel layer, values of up to 140 dm(3)·min(−1) were recorded. Another parameter recorded during the damming of water by the embankment was the speed of water suction by the geosynthetic and gravel drainage; the values were 0.067 and 0.024 m(3)·s(−1), respectively. The efficiency of water drainage through the geocomposite was sufficient. It is possible to use the slopes of the landfill for drainage, which will reduce material and financial outlays. MDPI 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8585300/ /pubmed/34771846 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216321 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cholewa, Mariusz
Plesiński, Karol
Performance Comparison of Geodrain Drainage and Gravel Drainage Layers Embedded in a Horizontal Plane
title Performance Comparison of Geodrain Drainage and Gravel Drainage Layers Embedded in a Horizontal Plane
title_full Performance Comparison of Geodrain Drainage and Gravel Drainage Layers Embedded in a Horizontal Plane
title_fullStr Performance Comparison of Geodrain Drainage and Gravel Drainage Layers Embedded in a Horizontal Plane
title_full_unstemmed Performance Comparison of Geodrain Drainage and Gravel Drainage Layers Embedded in a Horizontal Plane
title_short Performance Comparison of Geodrain Drainage and Gravel Drainage Layers Embedded in a Horizontal Plane
title_sort performance comparison of geodrain drainage and gravel drainage layers embedded in a horizontal plane
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8585300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34771846
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216321
work_keys_str_mv AT cholewamariusz performancecomparisonofgeodraindrainageandgraveldrainagelayersembeddedinahorizontalplane
AT plesinskikarol performancecomparisonofgeodraindrainageandgraveldrainagelayersembeddedinahorizontalplane