Cargando…

Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study

This study aimed to evaluate the airborne-particle abrasion surface treatment effects on the tensile bond strength (TBS) between resilient denture liner and CAD/CAM or conventional heat polymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) acrylic denture resins. A total of 48 dumbbell-shaped specimens (70...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al Taweel, Sara Mohammad, Al-Otaibi, Hanan Nejer, Labban, Nawaf, AlFouzan, Afnan, Shehri, Huda Al
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8585430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772140
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216614
_version_ 1784597687854694400
author Al Taweel, Sara Mohammad
Al-Otaibi, Hanan Nejer
Labban, Nawaf
AlFouzan, Afnan
Shehri, Huda Al
author_facet Al Taweel, Sara Mohammad
Al-Otaibi, Hanan Nejer
Labban, Nawaf
AlFouzan, Afnan
Shehri, Huda Al
author_sort Al Taweel, Sara Mohammad
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the airborne-particle abrasion surface treatment effects on the tensile bond strength (TBS) between resilient denture liner and CAD/CAM or conventional heat polymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) acrylic denture resins. A total of 48 dumbbell-shaped specimens (70 mm in total length, and 12 mm and 7 mm in diameter at the thickest and thinnest section, respectively) were prepared from CAD/CAM and conventional acrylic resins. Before relining with denture liner, 12 specimens from each material were surface-treated by 110 µm Al(2)O(3) airborne-particle abrasion, and the remaining specimens served as control (no treatment). Following relining, all the specimens were aged by thermal cycling (1000 cycles, 5–55 °C). The TBS of denture liner to acrylic denture resins was tested in a universal testing apparatus at a 5 mm/min crosshead speed. The debonded surfaces were visually examined for the failure modes. ANOVA and multiple comparisons posthoc analysis tests were applied to determine the significant difference in TBS between the study groups (α = 0.05). A significant difference in TBS was observed between the control and surface treated groups (p < 0.001) for both acrylic resins materials. However, there was no statistically significant difference in bond strength between the acrylic resins materials (p = 0.739). Surface treatment with airborne-particle abrasion demonstrated increased TBS of the soft denture liners to acrylic resins. The TBS of conventional and CAD/CAM acrylic resins to soft denture liners were not considerably different.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8585430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85854302021-11-12 Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study Al Taweel, Sara Mohammad Al-Otaibi, Hanan Nejer Labban, Nawaf AlFouzan, Afnan Shehri, Huda Al Materials (Basel) Article This study aimed to evaluate the airborne-particle abrasion surface treatment effects on the tensile bond strength (TBS) between resilient denture liner and CAD/CAM or conventional heat polymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) acrylic denture resins. A total of 48 dumbbell-shaped specimens (70 mm in total length, and 12 mm and 7 mm in diameter at the thickest and thinnest section, respectively) were prepared from CAD/CAM and conventional acrylic resins. Before relining with denture liner, 12 specimens from each material were surface-treated by 110 µm Al(2)O(3) airborne-particle abrasion, and the remaining specimens served as control (no treatment). Following relining, all the specimens were aged by thermal cycling (1000 cycles, 5–55 °C). The TBS of denture liner to acrylic denture resins was tested in a universal testing apparatus at a 5 mm/min crosshead speed. The debonded surfaces were visually examined for the failure modes. ANOVA and multiple comparisons posthoc analysis tests were applied to determine the significant difference in TBS between the study groups (α = 0.05). A significant difference in TBS was observed between the control and surface treated groups (p < 0.001) for both acrylic resins materials. However, there was no statistically significant difference in bond strength between the acrylic resins materials (p = 0.739). Surface treatment with airborne-particle abrasion demonstrated increased TBS of the soft denture liners to acrylic resins. The TBS of conventional and CAD/CAM acrylic resins to soft denture liners were not considerably different. MDPI 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8585430/ /pubmed/34772140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216614 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Al Taweel, Sara Mohammad
Al-Otaibi, Hanan Nejer
Labban, Nawaf
AlFouzan, Afnan
Shehri, Huda Al
Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study
title Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study
title_full Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study
title_fullStr Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study
title_short Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study
title_sort soft denture liner adhesion to conventional and cad/cam processed poly(methyl methacrylate) acrylic denture resins-an in-vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8585430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772140
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216614
work_keys_str_mv AT altaweelsaramohammad softdenturelineradhesiontoconventionalandcadcamprocessedpolymethylmethacrylateacrylicdentureresinsaninvitrostudy
AT alotaibihanannejer softdenturelineradhesiontoconventionalandcadcamprocessedpolymethylmethacrylateacrylicdentureresinsaninvitrostudy
AT labbannawaf softdenturelineradhesiontoconventionalandcadcamprocessedpolymethylmethacrylateacrylicdentureresinsaninvitrostudy
AT alfouzanafnan softdenturelineradhesiontoconventionalandcadcamprocessedpolymethylmethacrylateacrylicdentureresinsaninvitrostudy
AT shehrihudaal softdenturelineradhesiontoconventionalandcadcamprocessedpolymethylmethacrylateacrylicdentureresinsaninvitrostudy