Cargando…

Automated Identification of Skull Fractures With Deep Learning: A Comparison Between Object Detection and Segmentation Approach

Objective: Skull fractures caused by head trauma can lead to life-threatening complications. Hence, timely and accurate identification of fractures is of great importance. Therefore, this study aims to develop a deep learning system for automated identification of skull fractures from cranial comput...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shan, Wei, Guo, Jianwei, Mao, Xuewei, Zhang, Yulei, Huang, Yikun, Wang, Shuai, Li, Zixiao, Meng, Xia, Zhang, Pingye, Wu, Zhenzhou, Wang, Qun, Liu, Yaou, He, Kunlun, Wang, Yongjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8585755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777193
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.687931
_version_ 1784597748168785920
author Shan, Wei
Guo, Jianwei
Mao, Xuewei
Zhang, Yulei
Huang, Yikun
Wang, Shuai
Li, Zixiao
Meng, Xia
Zhang, Pingye
Wu, Zhenzhou
Wang, Qun
Liu, Yaou
He, Kunlun
Wang, Yongjun
author_facet Shan, Wei
Guo, Jianwei
Mao, Xuewei
Zhang, Yulei
Huang, Yikun
Wang, Shuai
Li, Zixiao
Meng, Xia
Zhang, Pingye
Wu, Zhenzhou
Wang, Qun
Liu, Yaou
He, Kunlun
Wang, Yongjun
author_sort Shan, Wei
collection PubMed
description Objective: Skull fractures caused by head trauma can lead to life-threatening complications. Hence, timely and accurate identification of fractures is of great importance. Therefore, this study aims to develop a deep learning system for automated identification of skull fractures from cranial computed tomography (CT) scans. Method: This study retrospectively analyzed CT scans of 4,782 patients (median age, 54 years; 2,583 males, 2,199 females; development set: n = 4,168, test set: n = 614) diagnosed with skull fractures between September 2016 and September 2020. Additional data of 7,856 healthy people were included in the analysis to reduce the probability of false detection. Skull fractures in all the scans were manually labeled by seven experienced neurologists. Two deep learning approaches were developed and tested for the identification of skull fractures. In the first approach, the fracture identification task was treated as an object detected problem, and a YOLOv3 network was trained to identify all the instances of skull fracture. In the second approach, the task was treated as a segmentation problem and a modified attention U-net was trained to segment all the voxels representing skull fracture. The developed models were tested using an external test set of 235 patients (93 with, and 142 without skull fracture). Results: On the test set, the YOLOv3 achieved average fracture detection sensitivity and specificity of 80.64, and 85.92%, respectively. On the same dataset, the modified attention U-Net achieved a fracture detection sensitivity and specificity of 82.80, and 88.73%, respectively. Conclusion: Deep learning methods can identify skull fractures with good sensitivity. The segmentation approach to fracture identification may achieve better results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8585755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85857552021-11-13 Automated Identification of Skull Fractures With Deep Learning: A Comparison Between Object Detection and Segmentation Approach Shan, Wei Guo, Jianwei Mao, Xuewei Zhang, Yulei Huang, Yikun Wang, Shuai Li, Zixiao Meng, Xia Zhang, Pingye Wu, Zhenzhou Wang, Qun Liu, Yaou He, Kunlun Wang, Yongjun Front Neurol Neurology Objective: Skull fractures caused by head trauma can lead to life-threatening complications. Hence, timely and accurate identification of fractures is of great importance. Therefore, this study aims to develop a deep learning system for automated identification of skull fractures from cranial computed tomography (CT) scans. Method: This study retrospectively analyzed CT scans of 4,782 patients (median age, 54 years; 2,583 males, 2,199 females; development set: n = 4,168, test set: n = 614) diagnosed with skull fractures between September 2016 and September 2020. Additional data of 7,856 healthy people were included in the analysis to reduce the probability of false detection. Skull fractures in all the scans were manually labeled by seven experienced neurologists. Two deep learning approaches were developed and tested for the identification of skull fractures. In the first approach, the fracture identification task was treated as an object detected problem, and a YOLOv3 network was trained to identify all the instances of skull fracture. In the second approach, the task was treated as a segmentation problem and a modified attention U-net was trained to segment all the voxels representing skull fracture. The developed models were tested using an external test set of 235 patients (93 with, and 142 without skull fracture). Results: On the test set, the YOLOv3 achieved average fracture detection sensitivity and specificity of 80.64, and 85.92%, respectively. On the same dataset, the modified attention U-Net achieved a fracture detection sensitivity and specificity of 82.80, and 88.73%, respectively. Conclusion: Deep learning methods can identify skull fractures with good sensitivity. The segmentation approach to fracture identification may achieve better results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8585755/ /pubmed/34777193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.687931 Text en Copyright © 2021 Shan, Guo, Mao, Zhang, Huang, Wang, Li, Meng, Zhang, Wu, Wang, Liu, He and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Shan, Wei
Guo, Jianwei
Mao, Xuewei
Zhang, Yulei
Huang, Yikun
Wang, Shuai
Li, Zixiao
Meng, Xia
Zhang, Pingye
Wu, Zhenzhou
Wang, Qun
Liu, Yaou
He, Kunlun
Wang, Yongjun
Automated Identification of Skull Fractures With Deep Learning: A Comparison Between Object Detection and Segmentation Approach
title Automated Identification of Skull Fractures With Deep Learning: A Comparison Between Object Detection and Segmentation Approach
title_full Automated Identification of Skull Fractures With Deep Learning: A Comparison Between Object Detection and Segmentation Approach
title_fullStr Automated Identification of Skull Fractures With Deep Learning: A Comparison Between Object Detection and Segmentation Approach
title_full_unstemmed Automated Identification of Skull Fractures With Deep Learning: A Comparison Between Object Detection and Segmentation Approach
title_short Automated Identification of Skull Fractures With Deep Learning: A Comparison Between Object Detection and Segmentation Approach
title_sort automated identification of skull fractures with deep learning: a comparison between object detection and segmentation approach
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8585755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777193
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.687931
work_keys_str_mv AT shanwei automatedidentificationofskullfractureswithdeeplearningacomparisonbetweenobjectdetectionandsegmentationapproach
AT guojianwei automatedidentificationofskullfractureswithdeeplearningacomparisonbetweenobjectdetectionandsegmentationapproach
AT maoxuewei automatedidentificationofskullfractureswithdeeplearningacomparisonbetweenobjectdetectionandsegmentationapproach
AT zhangyulei automatedidentificationofskullfractureswithdeeplearningacomparisonbetweenobjectdetectionandsegmentationapproach
AT huangyikun automatedidentificationofskullfractureswithdeeplearningacomparisonbetweenobjectdetectionandsegmentationapproach
AT wangshuai automatedidentificationofskullfractureswithdeeplearningacomparisonbetweenobjectdetectionandsegmentationapproach
AT lizixiao automatedidentificationofskullfractureswithdeeplearningacomparisonbetweenobjectdetectionandsegmentationapproach
AT mengxia automatedidentificationofskullfractureswithdeeplearningacomparisonbetweenobjectdetectionandsegmentationapproach
AT zhangpingye automatedidentificationofskullfractureswithdeeplearningacomparisonbetweenobjectdetectionandsegmentationapproach
AT wuzhenzhou automatedidentificationofskullfractureswithdeeplearningacomparisonbetweenobjectdetectionandsegmentationapproach
AT wangqun automatedidentificationofskullfractureswithdeeplearningacomparisonbetweenobjectdetectionandsegmentationapproach
AT liuyaou automatedidentificationofskullfractureswithdeeplearningacomparisonbetweenobjectdetectionandsegmentationapproach
AT hekunlun automatedidentificationofskullfractureswithdeeplearningacomparisonbetweenobjectdetectionandsegmentationapproach
AT wangyongjun automatedidentificationofskullfractureswithdeeplearningacomparisonbetweenobjectdetectionandsegmentationapproach