Cargando…

Do different growth rates of trees cause distinct habitat qualities for saproxylic assemblages?

In production forests, a common silvicultural objective is enhancing tree growth rates. The growth rate influences both mechanical and biochemical properties of wood, which may have an impact on dead wood inhabiting (i.e. saproxylic) species. In this study, we tested for the first time whether tree...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Runnel, Kadri, Stephan, Jörg G., Jonsell, Mats, Kutser, Kadi, Lõhmus, Asko, Strengbom, Joachim, Tamm, Heidi, Ranius, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8585823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34657178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-05061-z
_version_ 1784597763243114496
author Runnel, Kadri
Stephan, Jörg G.
Jonsell, Mats
Kutser, Kadi
Lõhmus, Asko
Strengbom, Joachim
Tamm, Heidi
Ranius, Thomas
author_facet Runnel, Kadri
Stephan, Jörg G.
Jonsell, Mats
Kutser, Kadi
Lõhmus, Asko
Strengbom, Joachim
Tamm, Heidi
Ranius, Thomas
author_sort Runnel, Kadri
collection PubMed
description In production forests, a common silvicultural objective is enhancing tree growth rates. The growth rate influences both mechanical and biochemical properties of wood, which may have an impact on dead wood inhabiting (i.e. saproxylic) species. In this study, we tested for the first time whether tree growth rates affect dead-wood associated assemblages in general and the occurrence of red-listed species in particular. We sampled saproxylic beetles (eclector traps) and fungi (DNA metabarcoding of wood samples) in dead trunks of Norway spruce (Picea abies), which had different growth rates within the same hemiboreal forests in Sweden. A high proportion of fungi showed a positive association to increasing tree growth. This resulted in higher fungal richness in fast-grown trees both at the trunk scale and across multiple studied trunks. Such patterns were not observed for saproxylic beetles. However, a set of species (both beetles and fungi) preferred slow-grown wood. Moreover, the total number of red-listed species was highest in slow-grown trunks. We conclude that dead wood from slow-grown trees hosts relatively fewer saproxylic species, but a part of these may be vulnerable to production forestry. It implies that slow-grown trees should be a target in nature conservation. However, where slow-grown trees are absent, for instance in forests managed for a high biomass production, increasing the volumes of dead wood from fast-grown trees may support many species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00442-021-05061-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8585823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85858232021-11-15 Do different growth rates of trees cause distinct habitat qualities for saproxylic assemblages? Runnel, Kadri Stephan, Jörg G. Jonsell, Mats Kutser, Kadi Lõhmus, Asko Strengbom, Joachim Tamm, Heidi Ranius, Thomas Oecologia Conservation Ecology–Original Research In production forests, a common silvicultural objective is enhancing tree growth rates. The growth rate influences both mechanical and biochemical properties of wood, which may have an impact on dead wood inhabiting (i.e. saproxylic) species. In this study, we tested for the first time whether tree growth rates affect dead-wood associated assemblages in general and the occurrence of red-listed species in particular. We sampled saproxylic beetles (eclector traps) and fungi (DNA metabarcoding of wood samples) in dead trunks of Norway spruce (Picea abies), which had different growth rates within the same hemiboreal forests in Sweden. A high proportion of fungi showed a positive association to increasing tree growth. This resulted in higher fungal richness in fast-grown trees both at the trunk scale and across multiple studied trunks. Such patterns were not observed for saproxylic beetles. However, a set of species (both beetles and fungi) preferred slow-grown wood. Moreover, the total number of red-listed species was highest in slow-grown trunks. We conclude that dead wood from slow-grown trees hosts relatively fewer saproxylic species, but a part of these may be vulnerable to production forestry. It implies that slow-grown trees should be a target in nature conservation. However, where slow-grown trees are absent, for instance in forests managed for a high biomass production, increasing the volumes of dead wood from fast-grown trees may support many species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00442-021-05061-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-17 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8585823/ /pubmed/34657178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-05061-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Conservation Ecology–Original Research
Runnel, Kadri
Stephan, Jörg G.
Jonsell, Mats
Kutser, Kadi
Lõhmus, Asko
Strengbom, Joachim
Tamm, Heidi
Ranius, Thomas
Do different growth rates of trees cause distinct habitat qualities for saproxylic assemblages?
title Do different growth rates of trees cause distinct habitat qualities for saproxylic assemblages?
title_full Do different growth rates of trees cause distinct habitat qualities for saproxylic assemblages?
title_fullStr Do different growth rates of trees cause distinct habitat qualities for saproxylic assemblages?
title_full_unstemmed Do different growth rates of trees cause distinct habitat qualities for saproxylic assemblages?
title_short Do different growth rates of trees cause distinct habitat qualities for saproxylic assemblages?
title_sort do different growth rates of trees cause distinct habitat qualities for saproxylic assemblages?
topic Conservation Ecology–Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8585823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34657178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-05061-z
work_keys_str_mv AT runnelkadri dodifferentgrowthratesoftreescausedistincthabitatqualitiesforsaproxylicassemblages
AT stephanjorgg dodifferentgrowthratesoftreescausedistincthabitatqualitiesforsaproxylicassemblages
AT jonsellmats dodifferentgrowthratesoftreescausedistincthabitatqualitiesforsaproxylicassemblages
AT kutserkadi dodifferentgrowthratesoftreescausedistincthabitatqualitiesforsaproxylicassemblages
AT lohmusasko dodifferentgrowthratesoftreescausedistincthabitatqualitiesforsaproxylicassemblages
AT strengbomjoachim dodifferentgrowthratesoftreescausedistincthabitatqualitiesforsaproxylicassemblages
AT tammheidi dodifferentgrowthratesoftreescausedistincthabitatqualitiesforsaproxylicassemblages
AT raniusthomas dodifferentgrowthratesoftreescausedistincthabitatqualitiesforsaproxylicassemblages