Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Pain-alleviating Methods before Local Anesthetic Administration in Children of 6 to 12 Years of Age: A Clinical Study

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Pediatric patients are apprehensive regarding having dental treatment mainly because of painful local anesthetic (LA) injections. Various techniques like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), topical anesthetic agents, and vibrator device are introduced...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patil, Sudha B, Popali, Divya D, Bondarde, Prashant A, Khandare, Nikhil S, Kothari, Akshay R, Chawla, Pooja S, Gawale, Sayali, Shinde, Gaurav A, Agrawal, Rachana S, Patkar, Aditi S, Mirgal, Saurabh R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8585909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34824494
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1998
_version_ 1784597784008065024
author Patil, Sudha B
Popali, Divya D
Bondarde, Prashant A
Khandare, Nikhil S
Kothari, Akshay R
Chawla, Pooja S
Gawale, Sayali
Shinde, Gaurav A
Agrawal, Rachana S
Patkar, Aditi S
Mirgal, Saurabh R
author_facet Patil, Sudha B
Popali, Divya D
Bondarde, Prashant A
Khandare, Nikhil S
Kothari, Akshay R
Chawla, Pooja S
Gawale, Sayali
Shinde, Gaurav A
Agrawal, Rachana S
Patkar, Aditi S
Mirgal, Saurabh R
author_sort Patil, Sudha B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Pediatric patients are apprehensive regarding having dental treatment mainly because of painful local anesthetic (LA) injections. Various techniques like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), topical anesthetic agents, and vibrator device are introduced to reduce discomfort before LA administration. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of TENS, 2% lignocaine gel, eutectic mixture of lignocaine and prilocaine (EMLA), and vibrating device before LA injections in alleviating pain in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty healthy children aged 6 to 12 years who required LA injections for dental procedures were selected and divided into four groups with 15 patients in each group. Wong–Baker's facial pain rating scale (WBFPRS) and face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability scale (FLACC) are used for pain perception which are tabulated, and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The test results demonstrated that the TENS group has shown the least mean WBFPRS and FLACC score, followed by vibrator devices, EMLA gel, and lignocaine gel. CONCLUSION: The newly introduced TENS apparatus showed encouraging results, hence can be used as a safe and reliable technique to be used in pediatric dentistry. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Patil SB, Popali DD, Bondarde PA, et al. Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Pain-alleviating Methods before Local Anesthetic Administration in Children of 6 to 12 Years of Age: A Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(4):447–453.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8585909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85859092021-11-24 Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Pain-alleviating Methods before Local Anesthetic Administration in Children of 6 to 12 Years of Age: A Clinical Study Patil, Sudha B Popali, Divya D Bondarde, Prashant A Khandare, Nikhil S Kothari, Akshay R Chawla, Pooja S Gawale, Sayali Shinde, Gaurav A Agrawal, Rachana S Patkar, Aditi S Mirgal, Saurabh R Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Pediatric patients are apprehensive regarding having dental treatment mainly because of painful local anesthetic (LA) injections. Various techniques like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), topical anesthetic agents, and vibrator device are introduced to reduce discomfort before LA administration. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of TENS, 2% lignocaine gel, eutectic mixture of lignocaine and prilocaine (EMLA), and vibrating device before LA injections in alleviating pain in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty healthy children aged 6 to 12 years who required LA injections for dental procedures were selected and divided into four groups with 15 patients in each group. Wong–Baker's facial pain rating scale (WBFPRS) and face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability scale (FLACC) are used for pain perception which are tabulated, and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The test results demonstrated that the TENS group has shown the least mean WBFPRS and FLACC score, followed by vibrator devices, EMLA gel, and lignocaine gel. CONCLUSION: The newly introduced TENS apparatus showed encouraging results, hence can be used as a safe and reliable technique to be used in pediatric dentistry. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Patil SB, Popali DD, Bondarde PA, et al. Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Pain-alleviating Methods before Local Anesthetic Administration in Children of 6 to 12 Years of Age: A Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(4):447–453. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8585909/ /pubmed/34824494 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1998 Text en Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Patil, Sudha B
Popali, Divya D
Bondarde, Prashant A
Khandare, Nikhil S
Kothari, Akshay R
Chawla, Pooja S
Gawale, Sayali
Shinde, Gaurav A
Agrawal, Rachana S
Patkar, Aditi S
Mirgal, Saurabh R
Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Pain-alleviating Methods before Local Anesthetic Administration in Children of 6 to 12 Years of Age: A Clinical Study
title Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Pain-alleviating Methods before Local Anesthetic Administration in Children of 6 to 12 Years of Age: A Clinical Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Pain-alleviating Methods before Local Anesthetic Administration in Children of 6 to 12 Years of Age: A Clinical Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Pain-alleviating Methods before Local Anesthetic Administration in Children of 6 to 12 Years of Age: A Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Pain-alleviating Methods before Local Anesthetic Administration in Children of 6 to 12 Years of Age: A Clinical Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Pain-alleviating Methods before Local Anesthetic Administration in Children of 6 to 12 Years of Age: A Clinical Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of different pain-alleviating methods before local anesthetic administration in children of 6 to 12 years of age: a clinical study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8585909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34824494
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1998
work_keys_str_mv AT patilsudhab comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofdifferentpainalleviatingmethodsbeforelocalanestheticadministrationinchildrenof6to12yearsofageaclinicalstudy
AT popalidivyad comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofdifferentpainalleviatingmethodsbeforelocalanestheticadministrationinchildrenof6to12yearsofageaclinicalstudy
AT bondardeprashanta comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofdifferentpainalleviatingmethodsbeforelocalanestheticadministrationinchildrenof6to12yearsofageaclinicalstudy
AT khandarenikhils comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofdifferentpainalleviatingmethodsbeforelocalanestheticadministrationinchildrenof6to12yearsofageaclinicalstudy
AT kothariakshayr comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofdifferentpainalleviatingmethodsbeforelocalanestheticadministrationinchildrenof6to12yearsofageaclinicalstudy
AT chawlapoojas comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofdifferentpainalleviatingmethodsbeforelocalanestheticadministrationinchildrenof6to12yearsofageaclinicalstudy
AT gawalesayali comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofdifferentpainalleviatingmethodsbeforelocalanestheticadministrationinchildrenof6to12yearsofageaclinicalstudy
AT shindegaurava comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofdifferentpainalleviatingmethodsbeforelocalanestheticadministrationinchildrenof6to12yearsofageaclinicalstudy
AT agrawalrachanas comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofdifferentpainalleviatingmethodsbeforelocalanestheticadministrationinchildrenof6to12yearsofageaclinicalstudy
AT patkaraditis comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofdifferentpainalleviatingmethodsbeforelocalanestheticadministrationinchildrenof6to12yearsofageaclinicalstudy
AT mirgalsaurabhr comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofdifferentpainalleviatingmethodsbeforelocalanestheticadministrationinchildrenof6to12yearsofageaclinicalstudy