Cargando…

PET/CT background noise and its effect on speech recognition

Positron emission tomography (PET) has been successfully used to investigate central nervous processes, including the central auditory pathway. Unlike early water-cooled PET-scanners, novel PET/CT scanners employ air cooling and include a CT system, both of which result in higher background noise le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Speck, Iva, Rottmayer, Valentin, Wiebe, Konstantin, Aschendorff, Antje, Thurow, Johannes, Frings, Lars, Meyer, Philipp T., Wesarg, Thomas, Arndt, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8585948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34764407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01686-5
_version_ 1784597793675935744
author Speck, Iva
Rottmayer, Valentin
Wiebe, Konstantin
Aschendorff, Antje
Thurow, Johannes
Frings, Lars
Meyer, Philipp T.
Wesarg, Thomas
Arndt, Susan
author_facet Speck, Iva
Rottmayer, Valentin
Wiebe, Konstantin
Aschendorff, Antje
Thurow, Johannes
Frings, Lars
Meyer, Philipp T.
Wesarg, Thomas
Arndt, Susan
author_sort Speck, Iva
collection PubMed
description Positron emission tomography (PET) has been successfully used to investigate central nervous processes, including the central auditory pathway. Unlike early water-cooled PET-scanners, novel PET/CT scanners employ air cooling and include a CT system, both of which result in higher background noise levels. In the present study, we describe the background noise generated by two state-of-the-art air-cooled PET/CT scanners. We measured speech recognition in background noise: recorded PET noise and a speech-shaped noise applied in clinical routine to subjects with normal hearing. Background noise produced by air-cooled PET/CT is considerable: 75.1 dB SPL (64.5 dB(A)) for the Philips Gemini TF64 and 76.9 dB SPL (68.4 dB(A)) for the Philips Vereos PET/CT (Philips Healthcare, The Netherlands). Subjects with normal hearing exhibited better speech recognition in recorded PET background noise compared with clinically applied speech-shaped noise. Speech recognition in both background noises correlated significantly. Background noise generated by PET/CT scanners should be considered when PET is used for the investigation of the central auditory pathway. Speech in PET noise is better than in speech-shaped noise because of the minor masking effect of the background noise of the PET/CT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8585948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85859482021-11-12 PET/CT background noise and its effect on speech recognition Speck, Iva Rottmayer, Valentin Wiebe, Konstantin Aschendorff, Antje Thurow, Johannes Frings, Lars Meyer, Philipp T. Wesarg, Thomas Arndt, Susan Sci Rep Article Positron emission tomography (PET) has been successfully used to investigate central nervous processes, including the central auditory pathway. Unlike early water-cooled PET-scanners, novel PET/CT scanners employ air cooling and include a CT system, both of which result in higher background noise levels. In the present study, we describe the background noise generated by two state-of-the-art air-cooled PET/CT scanners. We measured speech recognition in background noise: recorded PET noise and a speech-shaped noise applied in clinical routine to subjects with normal hearing. Background noise produced by air-cooled PET/CT is considerable: 75.1 dB SPL (64.5 dB(A)) for the Philips Gemini TF64 and 76.9 dB SPL (68.4 dB(A)) for the Philips Vereos PET/CT (Philips Healthcare, The Netherlands). Subjects with normal hearing exhibited better speech recognition in recorded PET background noise compared with clinically applied speech-shaped noise. Speech recognition in both background noises correlated significantly. Background noise generated by PET/CT scanners should be considered when PET is used for the investigation of the central auditory pathway. Speech in PET noise is better than in speech-shaped noise because of the minor masking effect of the background noise of the PET/CT. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8585948/ /pubmed/34764407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01686-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Speck, Iva
Rottmayer, Valentin
Wiebe, Konstantin
Aschendorff, Antje
Thurow, Johannes
Frings, Lars
Meyer, Philipp T.
Wesarg, Thomas
Arndt, Susan
PET/CT background noise and its effect on speech recognition
title PET/CT background noise and its effect on speech recognition
title_full PET/CT background noise and its effect on speech recognition
title_fullStr PET/CT background noise and its effect on speech recognition
title_full_unstemmed PET/CT background noise and its effect on speech recognition
title_short PET/CT background noise and its effect on speech recognition
title_sort pet/ct background noise and its effect on speech recognition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8585948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34764407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01686-5
work_keys_str_mv AT speckiva petctbackgroundnoiseanditseffectonspeechrecognition
AT rottmayervalentin petctbackgroundnoiseanditseffectonspeechrecognition
AT wiebekonstantin petctbackgroundnoiseanditseffectonspeechrecognition
AT aschendorffantje petctbackgroundnoiseanditseffectonspeechrecognition
AT thurowjohannes petctbackgroundnoiseanditseffectonspeechrecognition
AT fringslars petctbackgroundnoiseanditseffectonspeechrecognition
AT meyerphilippt petctbackgroundnoiseanditseffectonspeechrecognition
AT wesargthomas petctbackgroundnoiseanditseffectonspeechrecognition
AT arndtsusan petctbackgroundnoiseanditseffectonspeechrecognition