Cargando…

A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO)

INTRODUCTION: Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded crossover study. The Netherlands (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02112474). We hypothesized that the pain suppressive effects of 1000 Hz and 30 Hz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) strategies are equally effective in patients with chronic, neuropathic, unilat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breel, Jennifer, Wille, Frank, Wensing, Agnes G. C. L., Kallewaard, Jan Willem, Pelleboer, Harmen, Zuidema, Xander, Bürger, Katja, de Graaf, Stijn, Hollmann, Markus W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8586063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34091818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00268-7
_version_ 1784597818268188672
author Breel, Jennifer
Wille, Frank
Wensing, Agnes G. C. L.
Kallewaard, Jan Willem
Pelleboer, Harmen
Zuidema, Xander
Bürger, Katja
de Graaf, Stijn
Hollmann, Markus W.
author_facet Breel, Jennifer
Wille, Frank
Wensing, Agnes G. C. L.
Kallewaard, Jan Willem
Pelleboer, Harmen
Zuidema, Xander
Bürger, Katja
de Graaf, Stijn
Hollmann, Markus W.
author_sort Breel, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded crossover study. The Netherlands (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02112474). We hypothesized that the pain suppressive effects of 1000 Hz and 30 Hz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) strategies are equally effective in patients with chronic, neuropathic, unilateral leg pain after back surgery. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (18–70 years, minimum leg pain 50 mm on 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), minimal back pain) were randomized (1:1) to start 1000 Hz or 30 Hz neurostimulation for 9 days. After a 5-day washout, they crossed over, for another 9 days. Primary outcome was pain suppression (mean of VAS scores 4×/day) during the crossover period. The main investigators were blinded to strategy allocation, patients were blinded to the outcome, a blinded assessor analyzed the primary outcome. RESULTS: The primary outcome was analyzed in 26 patients. There was no period effect (delta 4 mm, p = 0.42, 95% CI [− 5, 13]), allowing direct intrapatient comparison of the treatment effect (delta 1 mm, p = 0.92, 95% CI [− 13, 14]). Ninety-two percent of patients in both periods experienced greater than 34% pain suppression (minimal clinically important difference, MCID). Secondary outcomes (22 patients): pain suppression and improved quality of life were sustained at 12 months; both were statistically significant and clinically relevant. Fifty percent of patients had greater than 80% pain suppression (p < 0.001). At study termination, all events were resolved; no unanticipated events were reported. Medtronic provided a grant for additional study costs. CONCLUSION: We conclude that our hypothesis regarding the effect of 1000 Hz and 30 Hz stimulation strategies on pain suppression was confirmed. Both stimulation strategies led to a large, sustainable, clinically relevant pain suppression and improvement in quality of life. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-021-00268-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8586063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85860632021-11-15 A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO) Breel, Jennifer Wille, Frank Wensing, Agnes G. C. L. Kallewaard, Jan Willem Pelleboer, Harmen Zuidema, Xander Bürger, Katja de Graaf, Stijn Hollmann, Markus W. Pain Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded crossover study. The Netherlands (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02112474). We hypothesized that the pain suppressive effects of 1000 Hz and 30 Hz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) strategies are equally effective in patients with chronic, neuropathic, unilateral leg pain after back surgery. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (18–70 years, minimum leg pain 50 mm on 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), minimal back pain) were randomized (1:1) to start 1000 Hz or 30 Hz neurostimulation for 9 days. After a 5-day washout, they crossed over, for another 9 days. Primary outcome was pain suppression (mean of VAS scores 4×/day) during the crossover period. The main investigators were blinded to strategy allocation, patients were blinded to the outcome, a blinded assessor analyzed the primary outcome. RESULTS: The primary outcome was analyzed in 26 patients. There was no period effect (delta 4 mm, p = 0.42, 95% CI [− 5, 13]), allowing direct intrapatient comparison of the treatment effect (delta 1 mm, p = 0.92, 95% CI [− 13, 14]). Ninety-two percent of patients in both periods experienced greater than 34% pain suppression (minimal clinically important difference, MCID). Secondary outcomes (22 patients): pain suppression and improved quality of life were sustained at 12 months; both were statistically significant and clinically relevant. Fifty percent of patients had greater than 80% pain suppression (p < 0.001). At study termination, all events were resolved; no unanticipated events were reported. Medtronic provided a grant for additional study costs. CONCLUSION: We conclude that our hypothesis regarding the effect of 1000 Hz and 30 Hz stimulation strategies on pain suppression was confirmed. Both stimulation strategies led to a large, sustainable, clinically relevant pain suppression and improvement in quality of life. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-021-00268-7. Springer Healthcare 2021-06-06 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8586063/ /pubmed/34091818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00268-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Breel, Jennifer
Wille, Frank
Wensing, Agnes G. C. L.
Kallewaard, Jan Willem
Pelleboer, Harmen
Zuidema, Xander
Bürger, Katja
de Graaf, Stijn
Hollmann, Markus W.
A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO)
title A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO)
title_full A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO)
title_fullStr A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO)
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO)
title_short A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO)
title_sort comparison of 1000 hz to 30 hz spinal cord stimulation strategies in patients with unilateral neuropathic leg pain due to failed back surgery syndrome: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, crossover clinical study (halo)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8586063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34091818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00268-7
work_keys_str_mv AT breeljennifer acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT willefrank acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT wensingagnesgcl acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT kallewaardjanwillem acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT pelleboerharmen acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT zuidemaxander acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT burgerkatja acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT degraafstijn acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT hollmannmarkusw acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT breeljennifer comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT willefrank comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT wensingagnesgcl comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT kallewaardjanwillem comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT pelleboerharmen comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT zuidemaxander comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT burgerkatja comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT degraafstijn comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo
AT hollmannmarkusw comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo