Cargando…
A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO)
INTRODUCTION: Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded crossover study. The Netherlands (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02112474). We hypothesized that the pain suppressive effects of 1000 Hz and 30 Hz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) strategies are equally effective in patients with chronic, neuropathic, unilat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8586063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34091818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00268-7 |
_version_ | 1784597818268188672 |
---|---|
author | Breel, Jennifer Wille, Frank Wensing, Agnes G. C. L. Kallewaard, Jan Willem Pelleboer, Harmen Zuidema, Xander Bürger, Katja de Graaf, Stijn Hollmann, Markus W. |
author_facet | Breel, Jennifer Wille, Frank Wensing, Agnes G. C. L. Kallewaard, Jan Willem Pelleboer, Harmen Zuidema, Xander Bürger, Katja de Graaf, Stijn Hollmann, Markus W. |
author_sort | Breel, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded crossover study. The Netherlands (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02112474). We hypothesized that the pain suppressive effects of 1000 Hz and 30 Hz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) strategies are equally effective in patients with chronic, neuropathic, unilateral leg pain after back surgery. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (18–70 years, minimum leg pain 50 mm on 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), minimal back pain) were randomized (1:1) to start 1000 Hz or 30 Hz neurostimulation for 9 days. After a 5-day washout, they crossed over, for another 9 days. Primary outcome was pain suppression (mean of VAS scores 4×/day) during the crossover period. The main investigators were blinded to strategy allocation, patients were blinded to the outcome, a blinded assessor analyzed the primary outcome. RESULTS: The primary outcome was analyzed in 26 patients. There was no period effect (delta 4 mm, p = 0.42, 95% CI [− 5, 13]), allowing direct intrapatient comparison of the treatment effect (delta 1 mm, p = 0.92, 95% CI [− 13, 14]). Ninety-two percent of patients in both periods experienced greater than 34% pain suppression (minimal clinically important difference, MCID). Secondary outcomes (22 patients): pain suppression and improved quality of life were sustained at 12 months; both were statistically significant and clinically relevant. Fifty percent of patients had greater than 80% pain suppression (p < 0.001). At study termination, all events were resolved; no unanticipated events were reported. Medtronic provided a grant for additional study costs. CONCLUSION: We conclude that our hypothesis regarding the effect of 1000 Hz and 30 Hz stimulation strategies on pain suppression was confirmed. Both stimulation strategies led to a large, sustainable, clinically relevant pain suppression and improvement in quality of life. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-021-00268-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8586063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85860632021-11-15 A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO) Breel, Jennifer Wille, Frank Wensing, Agnes G. C. L. Kallewaard, Jan Willem Pelleboer, Harmen Zuidema, Xander Bürger, Katja de Graaf, Stijn Hollmann, Markus W. Pain Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded crossover study. The Netherlands (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02112474). We hypothesized that the pain suppressive effects of 1000 Hz and 30 Hz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) strategies are equally effective in patients with chronic, neuropathic, unilateral leg pain after back surgery. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (18–70 years, minimum leg pain 50 mm on 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), minimal back pain) were randomized (1:1) to start 1000 Hz or 30 Hz neurostimulation for 9 days. After a 5-day washout, they crossed over, for another 9 days. Primary outcome was pain suppression (mean of VAS scores 4×/day) during the crossover period. The main investigators were blinded to strategy allocation, patients were blinded to the outcome, a blinded assessor analyzed the primary outcome. RESULTS: The primary outcome was analyzed in 26 patients. There was no period effect (delta 4 mm, p = 0.42, 95% CI [− 5, 13]), allowing direct intrapatient comparison of the treatment effect (delta 1 mm, p = 0.92, 95% CI [− 13, 14]). Ninety-two percent of patients in both periods experienced greater than 34% pain suppression (minimal clinically important difference, MCID). Secondary outcomes (22 patients): pain suppression and improved quality of life were sustained at 12 months; both were statistically significant and clinically relevant. Fifty percent of patients had greater than 80% pain suppression (p < 0.001). At study termination, all events were resolved; no unanticipated events were reported. Medtronic provided a grant for additional study costs. CONCLUSION: We conclude that our hypothesis regarding the effect of 1000 Hz and 30 Hz stimulation strategies on pain suppression was confirmed. Both stimulation strategies led to a large, sustainable, clinically relevant pain suppression and improvement in quality of life. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-021-00268-7. Springer Healthcare 2021-06-06 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8586063/ /pubmed/34091818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00268-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Breel, Jennifer Wille, Frank Wensing, Agnes G. C. L. Kallewaard, Jan Willem Pelleboer, Harmen Zuidema, Xander Bürger, Katja de Graaf, Stijn Hollmann, Markus W. A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO) |
title | A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO) |
title_full | A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO) |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO) |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO) |
title_short | A Comparison of 1000 Hz to 30 Hz Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies in Patients with Unilateral Neuropathic Leg Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Study (HALO) |
title_sort | comparison of 1000 hz to 30 hz spinal cord stimulation strategies in patients with unilateral neuropathic leg pain due to failed back surgery syndrome: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, crossover clinical study (halo) |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8586063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34091818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00268-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT breeljennifer acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT willefrank acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT wensingagnesgcl acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT kallewaardjanwillem acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT pelleboerharmen acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT zuidemaxander acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT burgerkatja acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT degraafstijn acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT hollmannmarkusw acomparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT breeljennifer comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT willefrank comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT wensingagnesgcl comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT kallewaardjanwillem comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT pelleboerharmen comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT zuidemaxander comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT burgerkatja comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT degraafstijn comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo AT hollmannmarkusw comparisonof1000hzto30hzspinalcordstimulationstrategiesinpatientswithunilateralneuropathiclegpainduetofailedbacksurgerysyndromeamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindedcrossoverclinicalstudyhalo |