Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Cervical and Thoracic Leads: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with lower thoracic leads has been studied extensively. However, the evidence base for cervical SCS is less well developed, and reports of multiarea SCS lead placement are uncommon. Therefore, this single-center retrospective study evaluated outcomes from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Surges, Gernot, Paulus, Joachim, Blaß, Theresa, Mendryscha, Kerstin, Bettag, Martin, Rotte, Anand
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8586300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34236671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00287-4
_version_ 1784597864887877632
author Surges, Gernot
Paulus, Joachim
Blaß, Theresa
Mendryscha, Kerstin
Bettag, Martin
Rotte, Anand
author_facet Surges, Gernot
Paulus, Joachim
Blaß, Theresa
Mendryscha, Kerstin
Bettag, Martin
Rotte, Anand
author_sort Surges, Gernot
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with lower thoracic leads has been studied extensively. However, the evidence base for cervical SCS is less well developed, and reports of multiarea SCS lead placement are uncommon. Therefore, this single-center retrospective study evaluated outcomes from 10-kHz SCS with cervical or combined cervical and thoracic lead placement. METHOD: All patients that underwent a 10-kHz SCS trial with either cervical or combined cervical and thoracic lead placement between 2015 and 2020 were included in our study. We reviewed patient’s charts for demographic information, lead placement, and pain scores up to 48 months after implantation. RESULTS: Of the 105 patients that underwent a 10-kHz SCS trial during the review period, 92 (88%) had back/neck or extremity pain that responded to therapy (≥ 50% pain relief from baseline) and received a permanent system. Sixty-two of these patients (67%) were implanted with combined cervical and thoracic leads, while 30 (33%) received cervical-only leads. Pain relief in both regions exceeded 60% at most visits throughout the 48-month study period. Throughout follow-up, the responder rate in both pain areas was consistently ≥ 70%. No unexpected adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: The 10-kHz SCS provided effective and durable pain relief with either cervical or combined cervical and thoracic leads. The efficacy and safety profile of both applications appears to be comparable to lower thoracic SCS. Our results suggest that 10-kHz SCS is a useful paresthesia-free therapeutic option for chronic neuropathic pain originating in the cervical area, as well as more complex multiarea pain presentations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8586300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85863002021-11-23 Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Cervical and Thoracic Leads: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience Surges, Gernot Paulus, Joachim Blaß, Theresa Mendryscha, Kerstin Bettag, Martin Rotte, Anand Pain Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with lower thoracic leads has been studied extensively. However, the evidence base for cervical SCS is less well developed, and reports of multiarea SCS lead placement are uncommon. Therefore, this single-center retrospective study evaluated outcomes from 10-kHz SCS with cervical or combined cervical and thoracic lead placement. METHOD: All patients that underwent a 10-kHz SCS trial with either cervical or combined cervical and thoracic lead placement between 2015 and 2020 were included in our study. We reviewed patient’s charts for demographic information, lead placement, and pain scores up to 48 months after implantation. RESULTS: Of the 105 patients that underwent a 10-kHz SCS trial during the review period, 92 (88%) had back/neck or extremity pain that responded to therapy (≥ 50% pain relief from baseline) and received a permanent system. Sixty-two of these patients (67%) were implanted with combined cervical and thoracic leads, while 30 (33%) received cervical-only leads. Pain relief in both regions exceeded 60% at most visits throughout the 48-month study period. Throughout follow-up, the responder rate in both pain areas was consistently ≥ 70%. No unexpected adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: The 10-kHz SCS provided effective and durable pain relief with either cervical or combined cervical and thoracic leads. The efficacy and safety profile of both applications appears to be comparable to lower thoracic SCS. Our results suggest that 10-kHz SCS is a useful paresthesia-free therapeutic option for chronic neuropathic pain originating in the cervical area, as well as more complex multiarea pain presentations. Springer Healthcare 2021-07-08 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8586300/ /pubmed/34236671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00287-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Surges, Gernot
Paulus, Joachim
Blaß, Theresa
Mendryscha, Kerstin
Bettag, Martin
Rotte, Anand
Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Cervical and Thoracic Leads: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience
title Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Cervical and Thoracic Leads: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience
title_full Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Cervical and Thoracic Leads: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Cervical and Thoracic Leads: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Cervical and Thoracic Leads: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience
title_short Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Cervical and Thoracic Leads: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience
title_sort efficacy and safety of 10 khz spinal cord stimulation using cervical and thoracic leads: a single-center retrospective experience
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8586300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34236671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00287-4
work_keys_str_mv AT surgesgernot efficacyandsafetyof10khzspinalcordstimulationusingcervicalandthoracicleadsasinglecenterretrospectiveexperience
AT paulusjoachim efficacyandsafetyof10khzspinalcordstimulationusingcervicalandthoracicleadsasinglecenterretrospectiveexperience
AT blaßtheresa efficacyandsafetyof10khzspinalcordstimulationusingcervicalandthoracicleadsasinglecenterretrospectiveexperience
AT mendryschakerstin efficacyandsafetyof10khzspinalcordstimulationusingcervicalandthoracicleadsasinglecenterretrospectiveexperience
AT bettagmartin efficacyandsafetyof10khzspinalcordstimulationusingcervicalandthoracicleadsasinglecenterretrospectiveexperience
AT rotteanand efficacyandsafetyof10khzspinalcordstimulationusingcervicalandthoracicleadsasinglecenterretrospectiveexperience