Cargando…

Performance Evaluation of the Glunovo® Continuous Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Chinese Participants with Diabetes: A Multicenter, Self-Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION: The present study was aimed to evaluate the performance and safety of the Glunovo® real-time continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in monitoring interstitial fluid glucose in adult participants with diabetes (at least 18 years old) using venous blood glucose as control. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meng, Ran, Gu, Tianwei, Yang, Fan, Liu, Jie, Sun, Qichao, Zhu, Dalong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8586329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34704201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01171-2
_version_ 1784597868286312448
author Meng, Ran
Gu, Tianwei
Yang, Fan
Liu, Jie
Sun, Qichao
Zhu, Dalong
author_facet Meng, Ran
Gu, Tianwei
Yang, Fan
Liu, Jie
Sun, Qichao
Zhu, Dalong
author_sort Meng, Ran
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The present study was aimed to evaluate the performance and safety of the Glunovo® real-time continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in monitoring interstitial fluid glucose in adult participants with diabetes (at least 18 years old) using venous blood glucose as control. METHODS: This was a multicenter, self-controlled clinical trial, conducted in participants with diabetes from China, between March 2019 to October 2019. The CGMS was used by all the participants for a 14-day wear-in period. The real-time glucose values measured by Glunovo® CGMS were compared with venous blood glucose values measured by the Entwicklung, Konstruktion und Fertigung (EKF) blood glucose detector. The primary outcomes were the consistency rate of CGMS readings and venous blood glucose values (20/20% standard). RESULTS: A total of 78 participants (41 men, 37 women) and 156 CGMS sensors were included in the study. Among the included participants, 25 and 53 participants had type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively, with median age of 52.50 years (range 32–62 years). The overall agreement rate (20/20%) was 89.71% (95% CI 89.18–90.24%). It was observed that 99.08% (95% CI 98.91–99.24%) and 99.82% (95% CI 99.74–99.89%) of the measuring points fell within the A + B zones of the Clarke error grid analysis and Parkes/consensus error grid analysis, respectively. The mean absolute relative difference was 10.30% ± 4.86%. The probability of a glucose measurement falling within a range, when stratified by venous glucose measurements, ranged from 7.14% for 19.44–22.22 mmol/L to 79.21% for 4.44–6.67 mmol/L. There were 73 (41.24%) and 27 (57.45%) successful CGMS alarms for hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic events, respectively. CONCLUSION: From the results, Glunovo® CGMS had excellent accuracy and limited clinical risk compared with venous blood glucose in the range of 2.2–22.2 mmol/L over 14 days. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-021-01171-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8586329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85863292021-11-23 Performance Evaluation of the Glunovo® Continuous Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Chinese Participants with Diabetes: A Multicenter, Self-Controlled Trial Meng, Ran Gu, Tianwei Yang, Fan Liu, Jie Sun, Qichao Zhu, Dalong Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The present study was aimed to evaluate the performance and safety of the Glunovo® real-time continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in monitoring interstitial fluid glucose in adult participants with diabetes (at least 18 years old) using venous blood glucose as control. METHODS: This was a multicenter, self-controlled clinical trial, conducted in participants with diabetes from China, between March 2019 to October 2019. The CGMS was used by all the participants for a 14-day wear-in period. The real-time glucose values measured by Glunovo® CGMS were compared with venous blood glucose values measured by the Entwicklung, Konstruktion und Fertigung (EKF) blood glucose detector. The primary outcomes were the consistency rate of CGMS readings and venous blood glucose values (20/20% standard). RESULTS: A total of 78 participants (41 men, 37 women) and 156 CGMS sensors were included in the study. Among the included participants, 25 and 53 participants had type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively, with median age of 52.50 years (range 32–62 years). The overall agreement rate (20/20%) was 89.71% (95% CI 89.18–90.24%). It was observed that 99.08% (95% CI 98.91–99.24%) and 99.82% (95% CI 99.74–99.89%) of the measuring points fell within the A + B zones of the Clarke error grid analysis and Parkes/consensus error grid analysis, respectively. The mean absolute relative difference was 10.30% ± 4.86%. The probability of a glucose measurement falling within a range, when stratified by venous glucose measurements, ranged from 7.14% for 19.44–22.22 mmol/L to 79.21% for 4.44–6.67 mmol/L. There were 73 (41.24%) and 27 (57.45%) successful CGMS alarms for hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic events, respectively. CONCLUSION: From the results, Glunovo® CGMS had excellent accuracy and limited clinical risk compared with venous blood glucose in the range of 2.2–22.2 mmol/L over 14 days. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-021-01171-2. Springer Healthcare 2021-10-26 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8586329/ /pubmed/34704201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01171-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Meng, Ran
Gu, Tianwei
Yang, Fan
Liu, Jie
Sun, Qichao
Zhu, Dalong
Performance Evaluation of the Glunovo® Continuous Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Chinese Participants with Diabetes: A Multicenter, Self-Controlled Trial
title Performance Evaluation of the Glunovo® Continuous Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Chinese Participants with Diabetes: A Multicenter, Self-Controlled Trial
title_full Performance Evaluation of the Glunovo® Continuous Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Chinese Participants with Diabetes: A Multicenter, Self-Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Performance Evaluation of the Glunovo® Continuous Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Chinese Participants with Diabetes: A Multicenter, Self-Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Performance Evaluation of the Glunovo® Continuous Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Chinese Participants with Diabetes: A Multicenter, Self-Controlled Trial
title_short Performance Evaluation of the Glunovo® Continuous Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Chinese Participants with Diabetes: A Multicenter, Self-Controlled Trial
title_sort performance evaluation of the glunovo® continuous blood glucose monitoring system in chinese participants with diabetes: a multicenter, self-controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8586329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34704201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01171-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mengran performanceevaluationoftheglunovocontinuousbloodglucosemonitoringsysteminchineseparticipantswithdiabetesamulticenterselfcontrolledtrial
AT gutianwei performanceevaluationoftheglunovocontinuousbloodglucosemonitoringsysteminchineseparticipantswithdiabetesamulticenterselfcontrolledtrial
AT yangfan performanceevaluationoftheglunovocontinuousbloodglucosemonitoringsysteminchineseparticipantswithdiabetesamulticenterselfcontrolledtrial
AT liujie performanceevaluationoftheglunovocontinuousbloodglucosemonitoringsysteminchineseparticipantswithdiabetesamulticenterselfcontrolledtrial
AT sunqichao performanceevaluationoftheglunovocontinuousbloodglucosemonitoringsysteminchineseparticipantswithdiabetesamulticenterselfcontrolledtrial
AT zhudalong performanceevaluationoftheglunovocontinuousbloodglucosemonitoringsysteminchineseparticipantswithdiabetesamulticenterselfcontrolledtrial