Cargando…

Effects of Dapagliflozin Compared with Sitagliptin and Metformin in Drug-Naïve Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A 12-Week, Open-Label, Randomized, Active-Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of dapagliflozin with those of sitagliptin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes who have never received glucose-lowering agents. METHODS: In this randomized, 12-week, open-label, active-controlled trial, 32 patients were randomly assig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ito, Daisuke, Inoue, Kazuyuki, Saito, Daigo, Hamaguchi, Keiko, Kaneko, Kimie, Sumita, Takashi, Inukai, Kouichi, Inoue, Ikuo, Shimada, Akira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8586398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34709582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01176-x
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of dapagliflozin with those of sitagliptin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes who have never received glucose-lowering agents. METHODS: In this randomized, 12-week, open-label, active-controlled trial, 32 patients were randomly assigned to receive dapagliflozin 5 mg, sitagliptin 50 mg, or metformin 1000 mg per day for 12 weeks. At baseline and at week 12, the patients underwent a meal tolerance test (MTT). RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, the changes in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose and plasma glucose area under the curve (AUC)(0–120 min) levels during the MTT from baseline were significantly improved in the three study groups, and there were no significant differences among the three study groups (P < 0.05). The mean changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to week 12 were − 0.96%, − 1.24%, and − 1.40% in the dapagliflozin, sitagliptin, and metformin groups, respectively. Although there was no significant difference among the three study groups, the lowering effect of HbA1c tended to be greater in the metformin group than in the dapagliflozin group. In contrast, the insulin AUC(0–120 min) levels at week 12 significantly decreased only in the dapagliflozin group (P = 0.049). Similarly, body weight was significantly reduced only in the dapagliflozin group (− 2.1 kg [− 2.7%], P = 0.047). Moreover, dapagliflozin significantly improved serum adiponectin levels (P = 0.003). However, there were no significant differences in the changes in these glycemic and metabolic parameters among the three study groups. No serious adverse events were documented in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin exerted beneficial effects similar to sitagliptin and metformin on glycemic parameters. In addition, dapagliflozin significantly reduced body weight and insulin AUC levels and improved serum adiponectin levels. Therefore, we suggest that these three hypoglycemic agents could be viable first-line medications for drug-naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000024427).