Cargando…

Pain Relief and Safety Outcomes with Cervical 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain in head, neck, shoulders and upper limbs is debilitating, and patients usually rely on pain medications or surgery to manage their symptoms. However, given the current opioid epidemic, non-pharmacological interventions that reduce pain, such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baranidharan, Ganesan, Bretherton, Beatrice, Montgomery, Craig, Titterington, John, Crowther, Tracey, Vannabouathong, Christopher, Inzana, Jason A., Rotte, Anand
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8586436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34031856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00269-6
_version_ 1784597887245615104
author Baranidharan, Ganesan
Bretherton, Beatrice
Montgomery, Craig
Titterington, John
Crowther, Tracey
Vannabouathong, Christopher
Inzana, Jason A.
Rotte, Anand
author_facet Baranidharan, Ganesan
Bretherton, Beatrice
Montgomery, Craig
Titterington, John
Crowther, Tracey
Vannabouathong, Christopher
Inzana, Jason A.
Rotte, Anand
author_sort Baranidharan, Ganesan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic pain in head, neck, shoulders and upper limbs is debilitating, and patients usually rely on pain medications or surgery to manage their symptoms. However, given the current opioid epidemic, non-pharmacological interventions that reduce pain, such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS), are needed. The purpose of this study was to review the evidence on paresthesia-free 10 kHz SCS therapy for neck and upper extremity pain. METHODS: Systematic literature search was performed for studies reporting outcomes for cervical 10 kHz SCS using date limits from May 2008 to November 2020. The study results were analyzed and described qualitatively. Additionally, when feasible, meta-analyses of the outcome data, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were conducted using both the fixed-effects (FE) and random-effects (RE) models. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies were eligible for inclusion. The proportion of patients who achieved ≥ 50% pain reduction was 83% (95% CI 77–89%) in both the FE and RE models. The proportion of patients who reduced/eliminated their opioid consumption was 39% (95% CI 31–46%) in the FE model and 39% (95% CI 31–48%) in the RE model. Pain or discomfort with the implant, lead migration, and infections were potential risks following cervical SCS. Explant rate was 0.1 (95% CI 0.0–0.2) events per 100 person-months, and no patients in the included studies experienced a neurological complication or paresthesia. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest 10 kHz SCS is a promising, safe, minimally invasive alternative for managing chronic upper limb and neck pain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-021-00269-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8586436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85864362021-11-23 Pain Relief and Safety Outcomes with Cervical 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis Baranidharan, Ganesan Bretherton, Beatrice Montgomery, Craig Titterington, John Crowther, Tracey Vannabouathong, Christopher Inzana, Jason A. Rotte, Anand Pain Ther Review BACKGROUND: Chronic pain in head, neck, shoulders and upper limbs is debilitating, and patients usually rely on pain medications or surgery to manage their symptoms. However, given the current opioid epidemic, non-pharmacological interventions that reduce pain, such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS), are needed. The purpose of this study was to review the evidence on paresthesia-free 10 kHz SCS therapy for neck and upper extremity pain. METHODS: Systematic literature search was performed for studies reporting outcomes for cervical 10 kHz SCS using date limits from May 2008 to November 2020. The study results were analyzed and described qualitatively. Additionally, when feasible, meta-analyses of the outcome data, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were conducted using both the fixed-effects (FE) and random-effects (RE) models. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies were eligible for inclusion. The proportion of patients who achieved ≥ 50% pain reduction was 83% (95% CI 77–89%) in both the FE and RE models. The proportion of patients who reduced/eliminated their opioid consumption was 39% (95% CI 31–46%) in the FE model and 39% (95% CI 31–48%) in the RE model. Pain or discomfort with the implant, lead migration, and infections were potential risks following cervical SCS. Explant rate was 0.1 (95% CI 0.0–0.2) events per 100 person-months, and no patients in the included studies experienced a neurological complication or paresthesia. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest 10 kHz SCS is a promising, safe, minimally invasive alternative for managing chronic upper limb and neck pain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-021-00269-6. Springer Healthcare 2021-05-25 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8586436/ /pubmed/34031856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00269-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Baranidharan, Ganesan
Bretherton, Beatrice
Montgomery, Craig
Titterington, John
Crowther, Tracey
Vannabouathong, Christopher
Inzana, Jason A.
Rotte, Anand
Pain Relief and Safety Outcomes with Cervical 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis
title Pain Relief and Safety Outcomes with Cervical 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Pain Relief and Safety Outcomes with Cervical 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Pain Relief and Safety Outcomes with Cervical 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Pain Relief and Safety Outcomes with Cervical 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Pain Relief and Safety Outcomes with Cervical 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort pain relief and safety outcomes with cervical 10 khz spinal cord stimulation: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8586436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34031856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00269-6
work_keys_str_mv AT baranidharanganesan painreliefandsafetyoutcomeswithcervical10khzspinalcordstimulationsystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT brethertonbeatrice painreliefandsafetyoutcomeswithcervical10khzspinalcordstimulationsystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT montgomerycraig painreliefandsafetyoutcomeswithcervical10khzspinalcordstimulationsystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT titteringtonjohn painreliefandsafetyoutcomeswithcervical10khzspinalcordstimulationsystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT crowthertracey painreliefandsafetyoutcomeswithcervical10khzspinalcordstimulationsystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT vannabouathongchristopher painreliefandsafetyoutcomeswithcervical10khzspinalcordstimulationsystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT inzanajasona painreliefandsafetyoutcomeswithcervical10khzspinalcordstimulationsystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT rotteanand painreliefandsafetyoutcomeswithcervical10khzspinalcordstimulationsystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis