Cargando…

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a Pipeline Flex embolization device for treatment of large, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms

Objective: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of the Pipeline Flex embolization device (PFED) in the treatment of large and wide-necked aneurysms in the internal carotid artery (ICA). Methods: The clinical data of 78 cases of large and wide-necked aneurysms in the ICA treated with this Pipe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Qiao, Feng, Wenfeng, Hai, Huanqi, Liu, Jianming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8586579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805855
http://dx.doi.org/10.19779/j.cnki.2096-3602.2018.04.06
_version_ 1784597916831186944
author Deng, Qiao
Feng, Wenfeng
Hai, Huanqi
Liu, Jianming
author_facet Deng, Qiao
Feng, Wenfeng
Hai, Huanqi
Liu, Jianming
author_sort Deng, Qiao
collection PubMed
description Objective: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of the Pipeline Flex embolization device (PFED) in the treatment of large and wide-necked aneurysms in the internal carotid artery (ICA). Methods: The clinical data of 78 cases of large and wide-necked aneurysms in the ICA treated with this Pipeline Flex embolization device in Shanghai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University and Southern Hospital of Southern Medical University from February 2017 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: A total of 66 cases were treated with a Pipeline Flex embolization device, 10 with a pipeline flex embolization device, and 2 with a double tubride stent (10 patients were treated with a pipeline stent-assisted coil embolization in; and 2 patients were treated with two pipeline stents). The patients were followed up for 3 to 18 months (average, 9.25 months). Among them, 63 cases had complete occlusion of the neck of the aneurysm (Raymondl Class I; MRS score 0; 80.8%). Aneurysms recurred in 12 cases (Raymondl Class II; MRS score 1; 15.4%). Delayed ischemic complications were observed in 1 case (MRS score >2; 0.13%). There was 1 case of poor release of stent and 1 case of stent stenosis (0.13%). Conclusion: The treatment of large, wide-necked aneurysms in the ICA with PFED has a high total occlusion rate and good prognosis was better than coil embolization, but the placement of PFED still has some neurological complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8586579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85865792021-11-19 Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a Pipeline Flex embolization device for treatment of large, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms Deng, Qiao Feng, Wenfeng Hai, Huanqi Liu, Jianming J Interv Med Clinical Study Objective: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of the Pipeline Flex embolization device (PFED) in the treatment of large and wide-necked aneurysms in the internal carotid artery (ICA). Methods: The clinical data of 78 cases of large and wide-necked aneurysms in the ICA treated with this Pipeline Flex embolization device in Shanghai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University and Southern Hospital of Southern Medical University from February 2017 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: A total of 66 cases were treated with a Pipeline Flex embolization device, 10 with a pipeline flex embolization device, and 2 with a double tubride stent (10 patients were treated with a pipeline stent-assisted coil embolization in; and 2 patients were treated with two pipeline stents). The patients were followed up for 3 to 18 months (average, 9.25 months). Among them, 63 cases had complete occlusion of the neck of the aneurysm (Raymondl Class I; MRS score 0; 80.8%). Aneurysms recurred in 12 cases (Raymondl Class II; MRS score 1; 15.4%). Delayed ischemic complications were observed in 1 case (MRS score >2; 0.13%). There was 1 case of poor release of stent and 1 case of stent stenosis (0.13%). Conclusion: The treatment of large, wide-necked aneurysms in the ICA with PFED has a high total occlusion rate and good prognosis was better than coil embolization, but the placement of PFED still has some neurological complications. Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8586579/ /pubmed/34805855 http://dx.doi.org/10.19779/j.cnki.2096-3602.2018.04.06 Text en © 2018 Shanghai Journal of Interventional Medicine Press. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Deng, Qiao
Feng, Wenfeng
Hai, Huanqi
Liu, Jianming
Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a Pipeline Flex embolization device for treatment of large, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms
title Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a Pipeline Flex embolization device for treatment of large, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms
title_full Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a Pipeline Flex embolization device for treatment of large, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms
title_fullStr Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a Pipeline Flex embolization device for treatment of large, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a Pipeline Flex embolization device for treatment of large, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms
title_short Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a Pipeline Flex embolization device for treatment of large, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms
title_sort evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a pipeline flex embolization device for treatment of large, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8586579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805855
http://dx.doi.org/10.19779/j.cnki.2096-3602.2018.04.06
work_keys_str_mv AT dengqiao evaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofapipelineflexembolizationdevicefortreatmentoflargewideneckedintracranialaneurysms
AT fengwenfeng evaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofapipelineflexembolizationdevicefortreatmentoflargewideneckedintracranialaneurysms
AT haihuanqi evaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofapipelineflexembolizationdevicefortreatmentoflargewideneckedintracranialaneurysms
AT liujianming evaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofapipelineflexembolizationdevicefortreatmentoflargewideneckedintracranialaneurysms