Cargando…
The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite
Soil amendments are substances added to the soil for moisture increment or physicochemical soil process enhancement. This study aimed to assess the water conservation efficiency of available organic soil amendments like bentonite, attapulgite, biochar and inorganics like superabsorbent polymer, and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216658 |
_version_ | 1784598048427474944 |
---|---|
author | Śpitalniak, Michał Bogacz, Adam Zięba, Zofia |
author_facet | Śpitalniak, Michał Bogacz, Adam Zięba, Zofia |
author_sort | Śpitalniak, Michał |
collection | PubMed |
description | Soil amendments are substances added to the soil for moisture increment or physicochemical soil process enhancement. This study aimed to assess the water conservation efficiency of available organic soil amendments like bentonite, attapulgite, biochar and inorganics like superabsorbent polymer, and nonwoven geotextile in relation to the newly developed water absorbing geocomposite (WAG) and its biodegradable version (bioWAG). Soil amendments were mixed with loamy sand soil, placed in 7.5 dm(3) pots, then watered and dried in controlled laboratory conditions during 22-day long drying cycles (pot experiment). Soil moisture was recorded in three locations, and matric potential was recorded in one location during the drying process. The conducted research has confirmed that the addition of any examined soil amendment in the amount of 0.7% increased soil moisture, compared to control, depending on measurement depth in the soil profile and evaporation stage. The application of WAG as a soil amendment resulted in higher soil moisture in the centre and bottom layers, by 5.4 percent point (p.p.) and 6.4 p.p. on day 4 and by 4.5 p.p. and 8.8 p.p. on day 7, respectively, relative to the control samples. Additionally, an experiment in a pressure plate extractor was conducted to ensure the reliability of the obtained results. Soil density and porosity were also recorded. Samples containing WAG had water holding capacity at a value of −10 kPa higher than samples with biochar, attapulgite, bentonite, bioWAG and control by 3.6, 2.1, 5.7, 1 and 4.5 percentage points, respectively. Only samples containing superabsorbent polymers and samples with nonwoven geotextiles had water holding capacity at a value of −10 kPa higher than WAG, by 14.3 and 0.1 percentage points, respectively. Significant changes were noted in samples amended with superabsorbent polymers resulting in a 90% soil sample porosity and bulk density decrease from 1.70 g∙cm(−3) to 1.14 g∙cm(−3). It was thus concluded that the water absorbing geocomposite is an advanced and most efficient solution for water retention in soil. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8587147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85871472021-11-13 The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite Śpitalniak, Michał Bogacz, Adam Zięba, Zofia Materials (Basel) Article Soil amendments are substances added to the soil for moisture increment or physicochemical soil process enhancement. This study aimed to assess the water conservation efficiency of available organic soil amendments like bentonite, attapulgite, biochar and inorganics like superabsorbent polymer, and nonwoven geotextile in relation to the newly developed water absorbing geocomposite (WAG) and its biodegradable version (bioWAG). Soil amendments were mixed with loamy sand soil, placed in 7.5 dm(3) pots, then watered and dried in controlled laboratory conditions during 22-day long drying cycles (pot experiment). Soil moisture was recorded in three locations, and matric potential was recorded in one location during the drying process. The conducted research has confirmed that the addition of any examined soil amendment in the amount of 0.7% increased soil moisture, compared to control, depending on measurement depth in the soil profile and evaporation stage. The application of WAG as a soil amendment resulted in higher soil moisture in the centre and bottom layers, by 5.4 percent point (p.p.) and 6.4 p.p. on day 4 and by 4.5 p.p. and 8.8 p.p. on day 7, respectively, relative to the control samples. Additionally, an experiment in a pressure plate extractor was conducted to ensure the reliability of the obtained results. Soil density and porosity were also recorded. Samples containing WAG had water holding capacity at a value of −10 kPa higher than samples with biochar, attapulgite, bentonite, bioWAG and control by 3.6, 2.1, 5.7, 1 and 4.5 percentage points, respectively. Only samples containing superabsorbent polymers and samples with nonwoven geotextiles had water holding capacity at a value of −10 kPa higher than WAG, by 14.3 and 0.1 percentage points, respectively. Significant changes were noted in samples amended with superabsorbent polymers resulting in a 90% soil sample porosity and bulk density decrease from 1.70 g∙cm(−3) to 1.14 g∙cm(−3). It was thus concluded that the water absorbing geocomposite is an advanced and most efficient solution for water retention in soil. MDPI 2021-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8587147/ /pubmed/34772181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216658 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Śpitalniak, Michał Bogacz, Adam Zięba, Zofia The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite |
title | The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite |
title_full | The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite |
title_fullStr | The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite |
title_full_unstemmed | The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite |
title_short | The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite |
title_sort | assessment of water retention efficiency of different soil amendments in comparison to water absorbing geocomposite |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216658 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spitalniakmichał theassessmentofwaterretentionefficiencyofdifferentsoilamendmentsincomparisontowaterabsorbinggeocomposite AT bogaczadam theassessmentofwaterretentionefficiencyofdifferentsoilamendmentsincomparisontowaterabsorbinggeocomposite AT ziebazofia theassessmentofwaterretentionefficiencyofdifferentsoilamendmentsincomparisontowaterabsorbinggeocomposite AT spitalniakmichał assessmentofwaterretentionefficiencyofdifferentsoilamendmentsincomparisontowaterabsorbinggeocomposite AT bogaczadam assessmentofwaterretentionefficiencyofdifferentsoilamendmentsincomparisontowaterabsorbinggeocomposite AT ziebazofia assessmentofwaterretentionefficiencyofdifferentsoilamendmentsincomparisontowaterabsorbinggeocomposite |