Cargando…

The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite

Soil amendments are substances added to the soil for moisture increment or physicochemical soil process enhancement. This study aimed to assess the water conservation efficiency of available organic soil amendments like bentonite, attapulgite, biochar and inorganics like superabsorbent polymer, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Śpitalniak, Michał, Bogacz, Adam, Zięba, Zofia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772181
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216658
_version_ 1784598048427474944
author Śpitalniak, Michał
Bogacz, Adam
Zięba, Zofia
author_facet Śpitalniak, Michał
Bogacz, Adam
Zięba, Zofia
author_sort Śpitalniak, Michał
collection PubMed
description Soil amendments are substances added to the soil for moisture increment or physicochemical soil process enhancement. This study aimed to assess the water conservation efficiency of available organic soil amendments like bentonite, attapulgite, biochar and inorganics like superabsorbent polymer, and nonwoven geotextile in relation to the newly developed water absorbing geocomposite (WAG) and its biodegradable version (bioWAG). Soil amendments were mixed with loamy sand soil, placed in 7.5 dm(3) pots, then watered and dried in controlled laboratory conditions during 22-day long drying cycles (pot experiment). Soil moisture was recorded in three locations, and matric potential was recorded in one location during the drying process. The conducted research has confirmed that the addition of any examined soil amendment in the amount of 0.7% increased soil moisture, compared to control, depending on measurement depth in the soil profile and evaporation stage. The application of WAG as a soil amendment resulted in higher soil moisture in the centre and bottom layers, by 5.4 percent point (p.p.) and 6.4 p.p. on day 4 and by 4.5 p.p. and 8.8 p.p. on day 7, respectively, relative to the control samples. Additionally, an experiment in a pressure plate extractor was conducted to ensure the reliability of the obtained results. Soil density and porosity were also recorded. Samples containing WAG had water holding capacity at a value of −10 kPa higher than samples with biochar, attapulgite, bentonite, bioWAG and control by 3.6, 2.1, 5.7, 1 and 4.5 percentage points, respectively. Only samples containing superabsorbent polymers and samples with nonwoven geotextiles had water holding capacity at a value of −10 kPa higher than WAG, by 14.3 and 0.1 percentage points, respectively. Significant changes were noted in samples amended with superabsorbent polymers resulting in a 90% soil sample porosity and bulk density decrease from 1.70 g∙cm(−3) to 1.14 g∙cm(−3). It was thus concluded that the water absorbing geocomposite is an advanced and most efficient solution for water retention in soil.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8587147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85871472021-11-13 The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite Śpitalniak, Michał Bogacz, Adam Zięba, Zofia Materials (Basel) Article Soil amendments are substances added to the soil for moisture increment or physicochemical soil process enhancement. This study aimed to assess the water conservation efficiency of available organic soil amendments like bentonite, attapulgite, biochar and inorganics like superabsorbent polymer, and nonwoven geotextile in relation to the newly developed water absorbing geocomposite (WAG) and its biodegradable version (bioWAG). Soil amendments were mixed with loamy sand soil, placed in 7.5 dm(3) pots, then watered and dried in controlled laboratory conditions during 22-day long drying cycles (pot experiment). Soil moisture was recorded in three locations, and matric potential was recorded in one location during the drying process. The conducted research has confirmed that the addition of any examined soil amendment in the amount of 0.7% increased soil moisture, compared to control, depending on measurement depth in the soil profile and evaporation stage. The application of WAG as a soil amendment resulted in higher soil moisture in the centre and bottom layers, by 5.4 percent point (p.p.) and 6.4 p.p. on day 4 and by 4.5 p.p. and 8.8 p.p. on day 7, respectively, relative to the control samples. Additionally, an experiment in a pressure plate extractor was conducted to ensure the reliability of the obtained results. Soil density and porosity were also recorded. Samples containing WAG had water holding capacity at a value of −10 kPa higher than samples with biochar, attapulgite, bentonite, bioWAG and control by 3.6, 2.1, 5.7, 1 and 4.5 percentage points, respectively. Only samples containing superabsorbent polymers and samples with nonwoven geotextiles had water holding capacity at a value of −10 kPa higher than WAG, by 14.3 and 0.1 percentage points, respectively. Significant changes were noted in samples amended with superabsorbent polymers resulting in a 90% soil sample porosity and bulk density decrease from 1.70 g∙cm(−3) to 1.14 g∙cm(−3). It was thus concluded that the water absorbing geocomposite is an advanced and most efficient solution for water retention in soil. MDPI 2021-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8587147/ /pubmed/34772181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216658 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Śpitalniak, Michał
Bogacz, Adam
Zięba, Zofia
The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite
title The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite
title_full The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite
title_fullStr The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite
title_full_unstemmed The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite
title_short The Assessment of Water Retention Efficiency of Different Soil Amendments in Comparison to Water Absorbing Geocomposite
title_sort assessment of water retention efficiency of different soil amendments in comparison to water absorbing geocomposite
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772181
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216658
work_keys_str_mv AT spitalniakmichał theassessmentofwaterretentionefficiencyofdifferentsoilamendmentsincomparisontowaterabsorbinggeocomposite
AT bogaczadam theassessmentofwaterretentionefficiencyofdifferentsoilamendmentsincomparisontowaterabsorbinggeocomposite
AT ziebazofia theassessmentofwaterretentionefficiencyofdifferentsoilamendmentsincomparisontowaterabsorbinggeocomposite
AT spitalniakmichał assessmentofwaterretentionefficiencyofdifferentsoilamendmentsincomparisontowaterabsorbinggeocomposite
AT bogaczadam assessmentofwaterretentionefficiencyofdifferentsoilamendmentsincomparisontowaterabsorbinggeocomposite
AT ziebazofia assessmentofwaterretentionefficiencyofdifferentsoilamendmentsincomparisontowaterabsorbinggeocomposite