Cargando…

Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review

The emergence of physiological monitoring technologies has produced exceptional opportunities for real-time collection and analysis of workers’ physiological information. To benefit from these safety and health prognostic opportunities, research efforts have explored the applicability of these devic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bustos, Denisse, Guedes, Joana C., Baptista, João Santos, Vaz, Mário P., Costa, José Torres, Fernandes, Ricardo J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34770556
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217249
_version_ 1784598110176018432
author Bustos, Denisse
Guedes, Joana C.
Baptista, João Santos
Vaz, Mário P.
Costa, José Torres
Fernandes, Ricardo J.
author_facet Bustos, Denisse
Guedes, Joana C.
Baptista, João Santos
Vaz, Mário P.
Costa, José Torres
Fernandes, Ricardo J.
author_sort Bustos, Denisse
collection PubMed
description The emergence of physiological monitoring technologies has produced exceptional opportunities for real-time collection and analysis of workers’ physiological information. To benefit from these safety and health prognostic opportunities, research efforts have explored the applicability of these devices to control workers’ wellbeing levels during occupational activities. A systematic review is proposed to summarise up-to-date progress in applying physiological monitoring systems for occupational groups. Adhering with the PRISMA Statement, five databases were searched from 2014 to 2021, and 12 keywords were combined, concluding with the selection of 38 articles. Sources of risk of bias were assessed regarding randomisation procedures, selective outcome reporting and generalisability of results. Assessment procedures involving non-invasive methods applied with health and safety-related goals were filtered. Working-age participants from homogeneous occupational groups were selected, with these groups primarily including firefighters and construction workers. Research objectives were mainly directed to assess heat stress and physiological workload demands. Heart rate related variables, thermal responses and motion tracking through accelerometry were the most common approaches. Overall, wearable sensors proved to be valid tools for assessing physiological status in working environments. Future research should focus on conducting sensor fusion assessments, engaging wearables in real-time evaluation methods and giving continuous feedback to workers and practitioners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8587311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85873112021-11-13 Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review Bustos, Denisse Guedes, Joana C. Baptista, João Santos Vaz, Mário P. Costa, José Torres Fernandes, Ricardo J. Sensors (Basel) Review The emergence of physiological monitoring technologies has produced exceptional opportunities for real-time collection and analysis of workers’ physiological information. To benefit from these safety and health prognostic opportunities, research efforts have explored the applicability of these devices to control workers’ wellbeing levels during occupational activities. A systematic review is proposed to summarise up-to-date progress in applying physiological monitoring systems for occupational groups. Adhering with the PRISMA Statement, five databases were searched from 2014 to 2021, and 12 keywords were combined, concluding with the selection of 38 articles. Sources of risk of bias were assessed regarding randomisation procedures, selective outcome reporting and generalisability of results. Assessment procedures involving non-invasive methods applied with health and safety-related goals were filtered. Working-age participants from homogeneous occupational groups were selected, with these groups primarily including firefighters and construction workers. Research objectives were mainly directed to assess heat stress and physiological workload demands. Heart rate related variables, thermal responses and motion tracking through accelerometry were the most common approaches. Overall, wearable sensors proved to be valid tools for assessing physiological status in working environments. Future research should focus on conducting sensor fusion assessments, engaging wearables in real-time evaluation methods and giving continuous feedback to workers and practitioners. MDPI 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8587311/ /pubmed/34770556 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217249 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bustos, Denisse
Guedes, Joana C.
Baptista, João Santos
Vaz, Mário P.
Costa, José Torres
Fernandes, Ricardo J.
Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review
title Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review
title_full Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review
title_short Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review
title_sort applicability of physiological monitoring systems within occupational groups: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34770556
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217249
work_keys_str_mv AT bustosdenisse applicabilityofphysiologicalmonitoringsystemswithinoccupationalgroupsasystematicreview
AT guedesjoanac applicabilityofphysiologicalmonitoringsystemswithinoccupationalgroupsasystematicreview
AT baptistajoaosantos applicabilityofphysiologicalmonitoringsystemswithinoccupationalgroupsasystematicreview
AT vazmariop applicabilityofphysiologicalmonitoringsystemswithinoccupationalgroupsasystematicreview
AT costajosetorres applicabilityofphysiologicalmonitoringsystemswithinoccupationalgroupsasystematicreview
AT fernandesricardoj applicabilityofphysiologicalmonitoringsystemswithinoccupationalgroupsasystematicreview