Cargando…
Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review
The emergence of physiological monitoring technologies has produced exceptional opportunities for real-time collection and analysis of workers’ physiological information. To benefit from these safety and health prognostic opportunities, research efforts have explored the applicability of these devic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34770556 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217249 |
_version_ | 1784598110176018432 |
---|---|
author | Bustos, Denisse Guedes, Joana C. Baptista, João Santos Vaz, Mário P. Costa, José Torres Fernandes, Ricardo J. |
author_facet | Bustos, Denisse Guedes, Joana C. Baptista, João Santos Vaz, Mário P. Costa, José Torres Fernandes, Ricardo J. |
author_sort | Bustos, Denisse |
collection | PubMed |
description | The emergence of physiological monitoring technologies has produced exceptional opportunities for real-time collection and analysis of workers’ physiological information. To benefit from these safety and health prognostic opportunities, research efforts have explored the applicability of these devices to control workers’ wellbeing levels during occupational activities. A systematic review is proposed to summarise up-to-date progress in applying physiological monitoring systems for occupational groups. Adhering with the PRISMA Statement, five databases were searched from 2014 to 2021, and 12 keywords were combined, concluding with the selection of 38 articles. Sources of risk of bias were assessed regarding randomisation procedures, selective outcome reporting and generalisability of results. Assessment procedures involving non-invasive methods applied with health and safety-related goals were filtered. Working-age participants from homogeneous occupational groups were selected, with these groups primarily including firefighters and construction workers. Research objectives were mainly directed to assess heat stress and physiological workload demands. Heart rate related variables, thermal responses and motion tracking through accelerometry were the most common approaches. Overall, wearable sensors proved to be valid tools for assessing physiological status in working environments. Future research should focus on conducting sensor fusion assessments, engaging wearables in real-time evaluation methods and giving continuous feedback to workers and practitioners. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8587311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85873112021-11-13 Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review Bustos, Denisse Guedes, Joana C. Baptista, João Santos Vaz, Mário P. Costa, José Torres Fernandes, Ricardo J. Sensors (Basel) Review The emergence of physiological monitoring technologies has produced exceptional opportunities for real-time collection and analysis of workers’ physiological information. To benefit from these safety and health prognostic opportunities, research efforts have explored the applicability of these devices to control workers’ wellbeing levels during occupational activities. A systematic review is proposed to summarise up-to-date progress in applying physiological monitoring systems for occupational groups. Adhering with the PRISMA Statement, five databases were searched from 2014 to 2021, and 12 keywords were combined, concluding with the selection of 38 articles. Sources of risk of bias were assessed regarding randomisation procedures, selective outcome reporting and generalisability of results. Assessment procedures involving non-invasive methods applied with health and safety-related goals were filtered. Working-age participants from homogeneous occupational groups were selected, with these groups primarily including firefighters and construction workers. Research objectives were mainly directed to assess heat stress and physiological workload demands. Heart rate related variables, thermal responses and motion tracking through accelerometry were the most common approaches. Overall, wearable sensors proved to be valid tools for assessing physiological status in working environments. Future research should focus on conducting sensor fusion assessments, engaging wearables in real-time evaluation methods and giving continuous feedback to workers and practitioners. MDPI 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8587311/ /pubmed/34770556 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217249 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Bustos, Denisse Guedes, Joana C. Baptista, João Santos Vaz, Mário P. Costa, José Torres Fernandes, Ricardo J. Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review |
title | Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | applicability of physiological monitoring systems within occupational groups: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34770556 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217249 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bustosdenisse applicabilityofphysiologicalmonitoringsystemswithinoccupationalgroupsasystematicreview AT guedesjoanac applicabilityofphysiologicalmonitoringsystemswithinoccupationalgroupsasystematicreview AT baptistajoaosantos applicabilityofphysiologicalmonitoringsystemswithinoccupationalgroupsasystematicreview AT vazmariop applicabilityofphysiologicalmonitoringsystemswithinoccupationalgroupsasystematicreview AT costajosetorres applicabilityofphysiologicalmonitoringsystemswithinoccupationalgroupsasystematicreview AT fernandesricardoj applicabilityofphysiologicalmonitoringsystemswithinoccupationalgroupsasystematicreview |