Cargando…
Efficacy of Reciprocating Instruments in the Removal of Bioceramic and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers: Micro-CT Analysis
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of reciprocating instruments in the removal of bioceramic and epoxy resin-based sealers using micro-CT analysis. Root canals of 40 extracted human teeth were instrumented with a size R25 Reciproc instrument. Specimens were randomly divided int...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216670 |
_version_ | 1784598188876890112 |
---|---|
author | Rajda, Marko Miletić, Ivana Baršić, Gorana Krmek, Silvana Jukić Šnjarić, Damir Baraba, Anja |
author_facet | Rajda, Marko Miletić, Ivana Baršić, Gorana Krmek, Silvana Jukić Šnjarić, Damir Baraba, Anja |
author_sort | Rajda, Marko |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of reciprocating instruments in the removal of bioceramic and epoxy resin-based sealers using micro-CT analysis. Root canals of 40 extracted human teeth were instrumented with a size R25 Reciproc instrument. Specimens were randomly divided into two groups (n = 20) according to the root canal filling material. In the first group, root canals were obturated with AH Plus sealer and Reciproc R25 gutta-percha. In the second group, a combination of bioceramic gutta-percha (TotalFill BC) and bioceramic sealer (TotalFill BC) was used. After one week, the retreatment of all specimens was performed using Reciproc instruments. To analyze the differences in the filling remnants, specimens were scanned in a micro-CT device after obturation and after the retreatment procedure. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.05). A combination of bioceramic sealer and bioceramic gutta-percha was more effectively removed from canals using a reciprocating instrument, with a filling remnants volume of 4.01 ± 3.13 mm(3), in comparison to the combination of epoxy resin-based sealer and gutta-percha (6.96 ± 2.70 mm(3)) (p < 0.05). A reciprocating instrument was more effective in removing bioceramic sealers than epoxy resin-based sealers, although none of the root canal filling materials were completely removed from the root canals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8587586 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85875862021-11-13 Efficacy of Reciprocating Instruments in the Removal of Bioceramic and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers: Micro-CT Analysis Rajda, Marko Miletić, Ivana Baršić, Gorana Krmek, Silvana Jukić Šnjarić, Damir Baraba, Anja Materials (Basel) Article The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of reciprocating instruments in the removal of bioceramic and epoxy resin-based sealers using micro-CT analysis. Root canals of 40 extracted human teeth were instrumented with a size R25 Reciproc instrument. Specimens were randomly divided into two groups (n = 20) according to the root canal filling material. In the first group, root canals were obturated with AH Plus sealer and Reciproc R25 gutta-percha. In the second group, a combination of bioceramic gutta-percha (TotalFill BC) and bioceramic sealer (TotalFill BC) was used. After one week, the retreatment of all specimens was performed using Reciproc instruments. To analyze the differences in the filling remnants, specimens were scanned in a micro-CT device after obturation and after the retreatment procedure. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.05). A combination of bioceramic sealer and bioceramic gutta-percha was more effectively removed from canals using a reciprocating instrument, with a filling remnants volume of 4.01 ± 3.13 mm(3), in comparison to the combination of epoxy resin-based sealer and gutta-percha (6.96 ± 2.70 mm(3)) (p < 0.05). A reciprocating instrument was more effective in removing bioceramic sealers than epoxy resin-based sealers, although none of the root canal filling materials were completely removed from the root canals. MDPI 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8587586/ /pubmed/34772195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216670 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rajda, Marko Miletić, Ivana Baršić, Gorana Krmek, Silvana Jukić Šnjarić, Damir Baraba, Anja Efficacy of Reciprocating Instruments in the Removal of Bioceramic and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers: Micro-CT Analysis |
title | Efficacy of Reciprocating Instruments in the Removal of Bioceramic and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers: Micro-CT Analysis |
title_full | Efficacy of Reciprocating Instruments in the Removal of Bioceramic and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers: Micro-CT Analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Reciprocating Instruments in the Removal of Bioceramic and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers: Micro-CT Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Reciprocating Instruments in the Removal of Bioceramic and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers: Micro-CT Analysis |
title_short | Efficacy of Reciprocating Instruments in the Removal of Bioceramic and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers: Micro-CT Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of reciprocating instruments in the removal of bioceramic and epoxy resin-based sealers: micro-ct analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216670 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajdamarko efficacyofreciprocatinginstrumentsintheremovalofbioceramicandepoxyresinbasedsealersmicroctanalysis AT mileticivana efficacyofreciprocatinginstrumentsintheremovalofbioceramicandepoxyresinbasedsealersmicroctanalysis AT barsicgorana efficacyofreciprocatinginstrumentsintheremovalofbioceramicandepoxyresinbasedsealersmicroctanalysis AT krmeksilvanajukic efficacyofreciprocatinginstrumentsintheremovalofbioceramicandepoxyresinbasedsealersmicroctanalysis AT snjaricdamir efficacyofreciprocatinginstrumentsintheremovalofbioceramicandepoxyresinbasedsealersmicroctanalysis AT barabaanja efficacyofreciprocatinginstrumentsintheremovalofbioceramicandepoxyresinbasedsealersmicroctanalysis |