Cargando…
Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review
OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent and nature of evidence on the use of the environmental scan (ES) in the health services delivery literature. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: This scoping review followed the five-stage scoping review methodology outlined by Khalil et al. A Peer Review of Electronic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34758992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050284 |
_version_ | 1784598190638497792 |
---|---|
author | Charlton, Patricia Kean, Terri Liu, Rebecca H Nagel, Daniel A Azar, Rima Doucet, Shelley Luke, Alison Montelpare, William Mears, Kim Boulos, Leah |
author_facet | Charlton, Patricia Kean, Terri Liu, Rebecca H Nagel, Daniel A Azar, Rima Doucet, Shelley Luke, Alison Montelpare, William Mears, Kim Boulos, Leah |
author_sort | Charlton, Patricia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent and nature of evidence on the use of the environmental scan (ES) in the health services delivery literature. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: This scoping review followed the five-stage scoping review methodology outlined by Khalil et al. A Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies was completed. Seven electronic databases and the grey literature were searched. Pairs of researchers independently performed two levels of screening and data extraction. Data were analysed using qualitative content and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Ninety-six studies were included in the scoping review. Researchers conducted ESs for many purposes, the most common being to examine the current state of programmes, services or policies. Recommendations were informed by ESs in 20% of studies. Most common data collection methods were literature review (71%), key informant or semistructured interviews (46%) and surveys (35%). Over half (53%) of the studies used a combination of passive (looking at information eg, literature, policies, guidelines) and active (looking for information eg, surveys, interviews) approaches to data collection. Person sources of data (eg, healthcare stakeholders, community representatives) and non-person sources of data (eg, documents, electronic databases, the web) were drawn on to a similar extent. The thematic analysis of the definitions/descriptions yielded several themes including instrument of discovery, knowledge synthesis, forward-looking and decision making. Research gaps identified included absence of a standard definition, inconsistencies in terminology and lack of guiding frameworks in the health services delivery context. CONCLUSION: ESs were conducted to gather evidence and to help inform decision making on a range of policy and health services delivery issues across the continuum of care. Consistency in terminology, a consensus definition and more guidance on ES design may help provide structure for researchers and other stakeholders, and ultimately advance ES as a methodological approach. A working definition of ES in a health services delivery context is presented. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8587593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85875932021-11-15 Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review Charlton, Patricia Kean, Terri Liu, Rebecca H Nagel, Daniel A Azar, Rima Doucet, Shelley Luke, Alison Montelpare, William Mears, Kim Boulos, Leah BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent and nature of evidence on the use of the environmental scan (ES) in the health services delivery literature. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: This scoping review followed the five-stage scoping review methodology outlined by Khalil et al. A Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies was completed. Seven electronic databases and the grey literature were searched. Pairs of researchers independently performed two levels of screening and data extraction. Data were analysed using qualitative content and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Ninety-six studies were included in the scoping review. Researchers conducted ESs for many purposes, the most common being to examine the current state of programmes, services or policies. Recommendations were informed by ESs in 20% of studies. Most common data collection methods were literature review (71%), key informant or semistructured interviews (46%) and surveys (35%). Over half (53%) of the studies used a combination of passive (looking at information eg, literature, policies, guidelines) and active (looking for information eg, surveys, interviews) approaches to data collection. Person sources of data (eg, healthcare stakeholders, community representatives) and non-person sources of data (eg, documents, electronic databases, the web) were drawn on to a similar extent. The thematic analysis of the definitions/descriptions yielded several themes including instrument of discovery, knowledge synthesis, forward-looking and decision making. Research gaps identified included absence of a standard definition, inconsistencies in terminology and lack of guiding frameworks in the health services delivery context. CONCLUSION: ESs were conducted to gather evidence and to help inform decision making on a range of policy and health services delivery issues across the continuum of care. Consistency in terminology, a consensus definition and more guidance on ES design may help provide structure for researchers and other stakeholders, and ultimately advance ES as a methodological approach. A working definition of ES in a health services delivery context is presented. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8587593/ /pubmed/34758992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050284 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Charlton, Patricia Kean, Terri Liu, Rebecca H Nagel, Daniel A Azar, Rima Doucet, Shelley Luke, Alison Montelpare, William Mears, Kim Boulos, Leah Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review |
title | Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review |
title_full | Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review |
title_short | Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review |
title_sort | use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34758992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT charltonpatricia useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview AT keanterri useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview AT liurebeccah useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview AT nageldaniela useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview AT azarrima useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview AT doucetshelley useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview AT lukealison useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview AT montelparewilliam useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview AT mearskim useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview AT boulosleah useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview |