Cargando…

Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent and nature of evidence on the use of the environmental scan (ES) in the health services delivery literature. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: This scoping review followed the five-stage scoping review methodology outlined by Khalil et al. A Peer Review of Electronic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Charlton, Patricia, Kean, Terri, Liu, Rebecca H, Nagel, Daniel A, Azar, Rima, Doucet, Shelley, Luke, Alison, Montelpare, William, Mears, Kim, Boulos, Leah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34758992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050284
_version_ 1784598190638497792
author Charlton, Patricia
Kean, Terri
Liu, Rebecca H
Nagel, Daniel A
Azar, Rima
Doucet, Shelley
Luke, Alison
Montelpare, William
Mears, Kim
Boulos, Leah
author_facet Charlton, Patricia
Kean, Terri
Liu, Rebecca H
Nagel, Daniel A
Azar, Rima
Doucet, Shelley
Luke, Alison
Montelpare, William
Mears, Kim
Boulos, Leah
author_sort Charlton, Patricia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent and nature of evidence on the use of the environmental scan (ES) in the health services delivery literature. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: This scoping review followed the five-stage scoping review methodology outlined by Khalil et al. A Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies was completed. Seven electronic databases and the grey literature were searched. Pairs of researchers independently performed two levels of screening and data extraction. Data were analysed using qualitative content and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Ninety-six studies were included in the scoping review. Researchers conducted ESs for many purposes, the most common being to examine the current state of programmes, services or policies. Recommendations were informed by ESs in 20% of studies. Most common data collection methods were literature review (71%), key informant or semistructured interviews (46%) and surveys (35%). Over half (53%) of the studies used a combination of passive (looking at information eg, literature, policies, guidelines) and active (looking for information eg, surveys, interviews) approaches to data collection. Person sources of data (eg, healthcare stakeholders, community representatives) and non-person sources of data (eg, documents, electronic databases, the web) were drawn on to a similar extent. The thematic analysis of the definitions/descriptions yielded several themes including instrument of discovery, knowledge synthesis, forward-looking and decision making. Research gaps identified included absence of a standard definition, inconsistencies in terminology and lack of guiding frameworks in the health services delivery context. CONCLUSION: ESs were conducted to gather evidence and to help inform decision making on a range of policy and health services delivery issues across the continuum of care. Consistency in terminology, a consensus definition and more guidance on ES design may help provide structure for researchers and other stakeholders, and ultimately advance ES as a methodological approach. A working definition of ES in a health services delivery context is presented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8587593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85875932021-11-15 Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review Charlton, Patricia Kean, Terri Liu, Rebecca H Nagel, Daniel A Azar, Rima Doucet, Shelley Luke, Alison Montelpare, William Mears, Kim Boulos, Leah BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent and nature of evidence on the use of the environmental scan (ES) in the health services delivery literature. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: This scoping review followed the five-stage scoping review methodology outlined by Khalil et al. A Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies was completed. Seven electronic databases and the grey literature were searched. Pairs of researchers independently performed two levels of screening and data extraction. Data were analysed using qualitative content and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Ninety-six studies were included in the scoping review. Researchers conducted ESs for many purposes, the most common being to examine the current state of programmes, services or policies. Recommendations were informed by ESs in 20% of studies. Most common data collection methods were literature review (71%), key informant or semistructured interviews (46%) and surveys (35%). Over half (53%) of the studies used a combination of passive (looking at information eg, literature, policies, guidelines) and active (looking for information eg, surveys, interviews) approaches to data collection. Person sources of data (eg, healthcare stakeholders, community representatives) and non-person sources of data (eg, documents, electronic databases, the web) were drawn on to a similar extent. The thematic analysis of the definitions/descriptions yielded several themes including instrument of discovery, knowledge synthesis, forward-looking and decision making. Research gaps identified included absence of a standard definition, inconsistencies in terminology and lack of guiding frameworks in the health services delivery context. CONCLUSION: ESs were conducted to gather evidence and to help inform decision making on a range of policy and health services delivery issues across the continuum of care. Consistency in terminology, a consensus definition and more guidance on ES design may help provide structure for researchers and other stakeholders, and ultimately advance ES as a methodological approach. A working definition of ES in a health services delivery context is presented. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8587593/ /pubmed/34758992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050284 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Charlton, Patricia
Kean, Terri
Liu, Rebecca H
Nagel, Daniel A
Azar, Rima
Doucet, Shelley
Luke, Alison
Montelpare, William
Mears, Kim
Boulos, Leah
Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review
title Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review
title_full Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review
title_fullStr Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review
title_short Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review
title_sort use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34758992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050284
work_keys_str_mv AT charltonpatricia useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview
AT keanterri useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview
AT liurebeccah useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview
AT nageldaniela useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview
AT azarrima useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview
AT doucetshelley useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview
AT lukealison useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview
AT montelparewilliam useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview
AT mearskim useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview
AT boulosleah useofenvironmentalscansinhealthservicesdeliveryresearchascopingreview