Cargando…
Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios
This paper presents improvements in the physical layer reliability of the IEEE 802.11be standard. Most wireless system proposals do not fulfill the stringent requirements of Factory Automation use cases. The harsh propagation features of industrial environments usually require time retransmission te...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34770516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217209 |
_version_ | 1784598204001550336 |
---|---|
author | Fanari, Lorenzo Iradier, Eneko Bilbao, Iñigo Cabrera, Rufino Montalban, Jon Angueira, Pablo |
author_facet | Fanari, Lorenzo Iradier, Eneko Bilbao, Iñigo Cabrera, Rufino Montalban, Jon Angueira, Pablo |
author_sort | Fanari, Lorenzo |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper presents improvements in the physical layer reliability of the IEEE 802.11be standard. Most wireless system proposals do not fulfill the stringent requirements of Factory Automation use cases. The harsh propagation features of industrial environments usually require time retransmission techniques to guarantee link reliability. At the same time, retransmissions compromise latency. IEEE 802.11be, the upcoming WLAN standard, is being considered for Factory Automation (FA) communications. 802.11be addresses specifically latency and reliability difficulties, typical in the previous 802.11 standards. This paper evaluates different channel coding techniques potentially applicable in IEEE 802.11be. The methods suggested here are the following: WLAN LDPC, WLAN Convolutional Codes (CC), New Radio (NR) Polar, and Long Term Evolution (LTE)-based Turbo Codes. The tests consider an IEEE 802.11be prototype under the Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel and industrial channel models. The results suggest that the best performing codes in factory automation cases are the WLAN LDPCs and New Radio Polar Codes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8587646 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85876462021-11-13 Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios Fanari, Lorenzo Iradier, Eneko Bilbao, Iñigo Cabrera, Rufino Montalban, Jon Angueira, Pablo Sensors (Basel) Article This paper presents improvements in the physical layer reliability of the IEEE 802.11be standard. Most wireless system proposals do not fulfill the stringent requirements of Factory Automation use cases. The harsh propagation features of industrial environments usually require time retransmission techniques to guarantee link reliability. At the same time, retransmissions compromise latency. IEEE 802.11be, the upcoming WLAN standard, is being considered for Factory Automation (FA) communications. 802.11be addresses specifically latency and reliability difficulties, typical in the previous 802.11 standards. This paper evaluates different channel coding techniques potentially applicable in IEEE 802.11be. The methods suggested here are the following: WLAN LDPC, WLAN Convolutional Codes (CC), New Radio (NR) Polar, and Long Term Evolution (LTE)-based Turbo Codes. The tests consider an IEEE 802.11be prototype under the Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel and industrial channel models. The results suggest that the best performing codes in factory automation cases are the WLAN LDPCs and New Radio Polar Codes. MDPI 2021-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8587646/ /pubmed/34770516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217209 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fanari, Lorenzo Iradier, Eneko Bilbao, Iñigo Cabrera, Rufino Montalban, Jon Angueira, Pablo Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios |
title | Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios |
title_full | Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios |
title_short | Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios |
title_sort | comparison between different channel coding techniques for ieee 802.11be within factory automation scenarios |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34770516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217209 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fanarilorenzo comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios AT iradiereneko comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios AT bilbaoinigo comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios AT cabrerarufino comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios AT montalbanjon comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios AT angueirapablo comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios |