Cargando…

Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios

This paper presents improvements in the physical layer reliability of the IEEE 802.11be standard. Most wireless system proposals do not fulfill the stringent requirements of Factory Automation use cases. The harsh propagation features of industrial environments usually require time retransmission te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fanari, Lorenzo, Iradier, Eneko, Bilbao, Iñigo, Cabrera, Rufino, Montalban, Jon, Angueira, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34770516
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217209
_version_ 1784598204001550336
author Fanari, Lorenzo
Iradier, Eneko
Bilbao, Iñigo
Cabrera, Rufino
Montalban, Jon
Angueira, Pablo
author_facet Fanari, Lorenzo
Iradier, Eneko
Bilbao, Iñigo
Cabrera, Rufino
Montalban, Jon
Angueira, Pablo
author_sort Fanari, Lorenzo
collection PubMed
description This paper presents improvements in the physical layer reliability of the IEEE 802.11be standard. Most wireless system proposals do not fulfill the stringent requirements of Factory Automation use cases. The harsh propagation features of industrial environments usually require time retransmission techniques to guarantee link reliability. At the same time, retransmissions compromise latency. IEEE 802.11be, the upcoming WLAN standard, is being considered for Factory Automation (FA) communications. 802.11be addresses specifically latency and reliability difficulties, typical in the previous 802.11 standards. This paper evaluates different channel coding techniques potentially applicable in IEEE 802.11be. The methods suggested here are the following: WLAN LDPC, WLAN Convolutional Codes (CC), New Radio (NR) Polar, and Long Term Evolution (LTE)-based Turbo Codes. The tests consider an IEEE 802.11be prototype under the Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel and industrial channel models. The results suggest that the best performing codes in factory automation cases are the WLAN LDPCs and New Radio Polar Codes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8587646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85876462021-11-13 Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios Fanari, Lorenzo Iradier, Eneko Bilbao, Iñigo Cabrera, Rufino Montalban, Jon Angueira, Pablo Sensors (Basel) Article This paper presents improvements in the physical layer reliability of the IEEE 802.11be standard. Most wireless system proposals do not fulfill the stringent requirements of Factory Automation use cases. The harsh propagation features of industrial environments usually require time retransmission techniques to guarantee link reliability. At the same time, retransmissions compromise latency. IEEE 802.11be, the upcoming WLAN standard, is being considered for Factory Automation (FA) communications. 802.11be addresses specifically latency and reliability difficulties, typical in the previous 802.11 standards. This paper evaluates different channel coding techniques potentially applicable in IEEE 802.11be. The methods suggested here are the following: WLAN LDPC, WLAN Convolutional Codes (CC), New Radio (NR) Polar, and Long Term Evolution (LTE)-based Turbo Codes. The tests consider an IEEE 802.11be prototype under the Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel and industrial channel models. The results suggest that the best performing codes in factory automation cases are the WLAN LDPCs and New Radio Polar Codes. MDPI 2021-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8587646/ /pubmed/34770516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217209 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fanari, Lorenzo
Iradier, Eneko
Bilbao, Iñigo
Cabrera, Rufino
Montalban, Jon
Angueira, Pablo
Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios
title Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios
title_full Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios
title_fullStr Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios
title_short Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios
title_sort comparison between different channel coding techniques for ieee 802.11be within factory automation scenarios
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34770516
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217209
work_keys_str_mv AT fanarilorenzo comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios
AT iradiereneko comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios
AT bilbaoinigo comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios
AT cabrerarufino comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios
AT montalbanjon comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios
AT angueirapablo comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios