Cargando…

Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis for the Comparison of Seized Cannabis Samples

Cannabis sativa L. is widely used as recreational illegal drugs. Illicit Cannabis profiling, comparing seized samples, is challenging due to natural Cannabis heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to use GC–FID and GC–MS herbal fingerprints for intra (within)- and inter (between)-location variabil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slosse, Amorn, Van Durme, Filip, Samyn, Nele, Mangelings, Debby, Vander Heyden, Yvan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34771050
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216643
_version_ 1784598210199683072
author Slosse, Amorn
Van Durme, Filip
Samyn, Nele
Mangelings, Debby
Vander Heyden, Yvan
author_facet Slosse, Amorn
Van Durme, Filip
Samyn, Nele
Mangelings, Debby
Vander Heyden, Yvan
author_sort Slosse, Amorn
collection PubMed
description Cannabis sativa L. is widely used as recreational illegal drugs. Illicit Cannabis profiling, comparing seized samples, is challenging due to natural Cannabis heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to use GC–FID and GC–MS herbal fingerprints for intra (within)- and inter (between)-location variability evaluation. This study focused on finding an acceptable threshold to link seized samples. Through Pearson correlation-coefficient calculations between intra-location samples, ‘linked’ thresholds were derived using 95% and 99% confidence limits. False negative (FN) and false positive (FP) error rate calculations, aiming at obtaining the lowest possible FP value, were performed for different data pre-treatments. Fingerprint-alignment parameters were optimized using Automated Correlation-Optimized Warping (ACOW) or Design of Experiments (DoE), which presented similar results. Hence, ACOW data, as reference, showed 54% and 65% FP values (95 and 99% confidence, respectively). An additional fourth root normalization pre-treatment provided the best results for both the GC–FID and GC–MS datasets. For GC–FID, which showed the best improved FP error rate, 54 and 65% FP for the reference data decreased to 24 and 32%, respectively, after fourth root transformation. Cross-validation showed FP values similar as the entire calibration set, indicating the representativeness of the thresholds. A noteworthy improvement in discrimination between seized Cannabis samples could be concluded.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8587667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85876672021-11-13 Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis for the Comparison of Seized Cannabis Samples Slosse, Amorn Van Durme, Filip Samyn, Nele Mangelings, Debby Vander Heyden, Yvan Molecules Article Cannabis sativa L. is widely used as recreational illegal drugs. Illicit Cannabis profiling, comparing seized samples, is challenging due to natural Cannabis heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to use GC–FID and GC–MS herbal fingerprints for intra (within)- and inter (between)-location variability evaluation. This study focused on finding an acceptable threshold to link seized samples. Through Pearson correlation-coefficient calculations between intra-location samples, ‘linked’ thresholds were derived using 95% and 99% confidence limits. False negative (FN) and false positive (FP) error rate calculations, aiming at obtaining the lowest possible FP value, were performed for different data pre-treatments. Fingerprint-alignment parameters were optimized using Automated Correlation-Optimized Warping (ACOW) or Design of Experiments (DoE), which presented similar results. Hence, ACOW data, as reference, showed 54% and 65% FP values (95 and 99% confidence, respectively). An additional fourth root normalization pre-treatment provided the best results for both the GC–FID and GC–MS datasets. For GC–FID, which showed the best improved FP error rate, 54 and 65% FP for the reference data decreased to 24 and 32%, respectively, after fourth root transformation. Cross-validation showed FP values similar as the entire calibration set, indicating the representativeness of the thresholds. A noteworthy improvement in discrimination between seized Cannabis samples could be concluded. MDPI 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8587667/ /pubmed/34771050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216643 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Slosse, Amorn
Van Durme, Filip
Samyn, Nele
Mangelings, Debby
Vander Heyden, Yvan
Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis for the Comparison of Seized Cannabis Samples
title Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis for the Comparison of Seized Cannabis Samples
title_full Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis for the Comparison of Seized Cannabis Samples
title_fullStr Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis for the Comparison of Seized Cannabis Samples
title_full_unstemmed Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis for the Comparison of Seized Cannabis Samples
title_short Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis for the Comparison of Seized Cannabis Samples
title_sort gas chromatographic fingerprint analysis for the comparison of seized cannabis samples
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34771050
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216643
work_keys_str_mv AT slosseamorn gaschromatographicfingerprintanalysisforthecomparisonofseizedcannabissamples
AT vandurmefilip gaschromatographicfingerprintanalysisforthecomparisonofseizedcannabissamples
AT samynnele gaschromatographicfingerprintanalysisforthecomparisonofseizedcannabissamples
AT mangelingsdebby gaschromatographicfingerprintanalysisforthecomparisonofseizedcannabissamples
AT vanderheydenyvan gaschromatographicfingerprintanalysisforthecomparisonofseizedcannabissamples