Cargando…
Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis for the Comparison of Seized Cannabis Samples
Cannabis sativa L. is widely used as recreational illegal drugs. Illicit Cannabis profiling, comparing seized samples, is challenging due to natural Cannabis heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to use GC–FID and GC–MS herbal fingerprints for intra (within)- and inter (between)-location variabil...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34771050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216643 |
_version_ | 1784598210199683072 |
---|---|
author | Slosse, Amorn Van Durme, Filip Samyn, Nele Mangelings, Debby Vander Heyden, Yvan |
author_facet | Slosse, Amorn Van Durme, Filip Samyn, Nele Mangelings, Debby Vander Heyden, Yvan |
author_sort | Slosse, Amorn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cannabis sativa L. is widely used as recreational illegal drugs. Illicit Cannabis profiling, comparing seized samples, is challenging due to natural Cannabis heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to use GC–FID and GC–MS herbal fingerprints for intra (within)- and inter (between)-location variability evaluation. This study focused on finding an acceptable threshold to link seized samples. Through Pearson correlation-coefficient calculations between intra-location samples, ‘linked’ thresholds were derived using 95% and 99% confidence limits. False negative (FN) and false positive (FP) error rate calculations, aiming at obtaining the lowest possible FP value, were performed for different data pre-treatments. Fingerprint-alignment parameters were optimized using Automated Correlation-Optimized Warping (ACOW) or Design of Experiments (DoE), which presented similar results. Hence, ACOW data, as reference, showed 54% and 65% FP values (95 and 99% confidence, respectively). An additional fourth root normalization pre-treatment provided the best results for both the GC–FID and GC–MS datasets. For GC–FID, which showed the best improved FP error rate, 54 and 65% FP for the reference data decreased to 24 and 32%, respectively, after fourth root transformation. Cross-validation showed FP values similar as the entire calibration set, indicating the representativeness of the thresholds. A noteworthy improvement in discrimination between seized Cannabis samples could be concluded. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8587667 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85876672021-11-13 Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis for the Comparison of Seized Cannabis Samples Slosse, Amorn Van Durme, Filip Samyn, Nele Mangelings, Debby Vander Heyden, Yvan Molecules Article Cannabis sativa L. is widely used as recreational illegal drugs. Illicit Cannabis profiling, comparing seized samples, is challenging due to natural Cannabis heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to use GC–FID and GC–MS herbal fingerprints for intra (within)- and inter (between)-location variability evaluation. This study focused on finding an acceptable threshold to link seized samples. Through Pearson correlation-coefficient calculations between intra-location samples, ‘linked’ thresholds were derived using 95% and 99% confidence limits. False negative (FN) and false positive (FP) error rate calculations, aiming at obtaining the lowest possible FP value, were performed for different data pre-treatments. Fingerprint-alignment parameters were optimized using Automated Correlation-Optimized Warping (ACOW) or Design of Experiments (DoE), which presented similar results. Hence, ACOW data, as reference, showed 54% and 65% FP values (95 and 99% confidence, respectively). An additional fourth root normalization pre-treatment provided the best results for both the GC–FID and GC–MS datasets. For GC–FID, which showed the best improved FP error rate, 54 and 65% FP for the reference data decreased to 24 and 32%, respectively, after fourth root transformation. Cross-validation showed FP values similar as the entire calibration set, indicating the representativeness of the thresholds. A noteworthy improvement in discrimination between seized Cannabis samples could be concluded. MDPI 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8587667/ /pubmed/34771050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216643 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Slosse, Amorn Van Durme, Filip Samyn, Nele Mangelings, Debby Vander Heyden, Yvan Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis for the Comparison of Seized Cannabis Samples |
title | Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis for the Comparison of Seized Cannabis Samples |
title_full | Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis for the Comparison of Seized Cannabis Samples |
title_fullStr | Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis for the Comparison of Seized Cannabis Samples |
title_full_unstemmed | Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis for the Comparison of Seized Cannabis Samples |
title_short | Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis for the Comparison of Seized Cannabis Samples |
title_sort | gas chromatographic fingerprint analysis for the comparison of seized cannabis samples |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8587667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34771050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216643 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT slosseamorn gaschromatographicfingerprintanalysisforthecomparisonofseizedcannabissamples AT vandurmefilip gaschromatographicfingerprintanalysisforthecomparisonofseizedcannabissamples AT samynnele gaschromatographicfingerprintanalysisforthecomparisonofseizedcannabissamples AT mangelingsdebby gaschromatographicfingerprintanalysisforthecomparisonofseizedcannabissamples AT vanderheydenyvan gaschromatographicfingerprintanalysisforthecomparisonofseizedcannabissamples |