Cargando…

Quality Evaluation of Rock Mass Using RMR14 Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion

The uncertainties in quality evaluations of rock mass are embedded in the underlying multi-source data composed by a variety of testing methods and some specialized sensors. To mitigate this issue, a proper method of data-driven computing for quality evaluation of rock mass based on the theory of mu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Qi, Jiang, Qing, Li, Yuanhai, Wang, Ning, He, Lei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8588266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34770414
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217108
_version_ 1784598405385814016
author Zhang, Qi
Jiang, Qing
Li, Yuanhai
Wang, Ning
He, Lei
author_facet Zhang, Qi
Jiang, Qing
Li, Yuanhai
Wang, Ning
He, Lei
author_sort Zhang, Qi
collection PubMed
description The uncertainties in quality evaluations of rock mass are embedded in the underlying multi-source data composed by a variety of testing methods and some specialized sensors. To mitigate this issue, a proper method of data-driven computing for quality evaluation of rock mass based on the theory of multi-source data fusion is required. As the theory of multi-source data fusion, Dempster–Shafer (D-S) evidence theory is applied to the quality evaluation of rock mass. As the correlation between different rock mass indices is too large to be ignored, belief reinforcement and Murphy’s average belief theory are introduced to process the multi-source data of rock mass. The proposed method is designed based on RMR14, one of the most widely used quality-evaluating methods for rock mass in the world. To validate the proposed method, the data of rock mass is generated randomly to realize the data fusion based on the proposed method and the conventional D-S theory. The fusion results based on these two methods are compared. The result of the comparison shows the proposed method amplifies the distance between the possibilities at different ratings from 0.0666 to 0.5882, which makes the exact decision more accurate than the other. A case study is carried out in Daxiagu tunnel in China to prove the practical value of the proposed method. The result shows the rock mass rating of the studied section of the tunnel is in level III with the maximum possibility of 0.9838, which agrees with the geological survey report.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8588266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85882662021-11-13 Quality Evaluation of Rock Mass Using RMR14 Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion Zhang, Qi Jiang, Qing Li, Yuanhai Wang, Ning He, Lei Sensors (Basel) Article The uncertainties in quality evaluations of rock mass are embedded in the underlying multi-source data composed by a variety of testing methods and some specialized sensors. To mitigate this issue, a proper method of data-driven computing for quality evaluation of rock mass based on the theory of multi-source data fusion is required. As the theory of multi-source data fusion, Dempster–Shafer (D-S) evidence theory is applied to the quality evaluation of rock mass. As the correlation between different rock mass indices is too large to be ignored, belief reinforcement and Murphy’s average belief theory are introduced to process the multi-source data of rock mass. The proposed method is designed based on RMR14, one of the most widely used quality-evaluating methods for rock mass in the world. To validate the proposed method, the data of rock mass is generated randomly to realize the data fusion based on the proposed method and the conventional D-S theory. The fusion results based on these two methods are compared. The result of the comparison shows the proposed method amplifies the distance between the possibilities at different ratings from 0.0666 to 0.5882, which makes the exact decision more accurate than the other. A case study is carried out in Daxiagu tunnel in China to prove the practical value of the proposed method. The result shows the rock mass rating of the studied section of the tunnel is in level III with the maximum possibility of 0.9838, which agrees with the geological survey report. MDPI 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8588266/ /pubmed/34770414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217108 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Qi
Jiang, Qing
Li, Yuanhai
Wang, Ning
He, Lei
Quality Evaluation of Rock Mass Using RMR14 Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion
title Quality Evaluation of Rock Mass Using RMR14 Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion
title_full Quality Evaluation of Rock Mass Using RMR14 Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion
title_fullStr Quality Evaluation of Rock Mass Using RMR14 Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion
title_full_unstemmed Quality Evaluation of Rock Mass Using RMR14 Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion
title_short Quality Evaluation of Rock Mass Using RMR14 Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion
title_sort quality evaluation of rock mass using rmr14 based on multi-source data fusion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8588266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34770414
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217108
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangqi qualityevaluationofrockmassusingrmr14basedonmultisourcedatafusion
AT jiangqing qualityevaluationofrockmassusingrmr14basedonmultisourcedatafusion
AT liyuanhai qualityevaluationofrockmassusingrmr14basedonmultisourcedatafusion
AT wangning qualityevaluationofrockmassusingrmr14basedonmultisourcedatafusion
AT helei qualityevaluationofrockmassusingrmr14basedonmultisourcedatafusion