Cargando…

Socioeconomic gaps over time in colorectal cancer survival in England: flexible parametric survival analysis

BACKGROUND: Despite persistent reports of socioeconomic inequalities in colorectal cancer survival in England, the magnitude of survival differences has not been fully evaluated. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with colon cancer (n=68 169) and rectal cancer (n=38 267) in England (diagnosed between Janua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kajiwara Saito, Mari, Quaresma, Manuela, Fowler, Helen, Benitez Majano, Sara, Rachet, Bernard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8588290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34049927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2021-216754
_version_ 1784598411983454208
author Kajiwara Saito, Mari
Quaresma, Manuela
Fowler, Helen
Benitez Majano, Sara
Rachet, Bernard
author_facet Kajiwara Saito, Mari
Quaresma, Manuela
Fowler, Helen
Benitez Majano, Sara
Rachet, Bernard
author_sort Kajiwara Saito, Mari
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite persistent reports of socioeconomic inequalities in colorectal cancer survival in England, the magnitude of survival differences has not been fully evaluated. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with colon cancer (n=68 169) and rectal cancer (n=38 267) in England (diagnosed between January 2010 and March 2013) were analysed as a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Registry data linked with other population-based healthcare records. The flexible parametric model incorporating time-varying covariates was used to assess the difference in excess hazard of death and in net survival between the most affluent and the most deprived groups over time. RESULTS: Survival analyses showed a clear pattern by deprivation. Hazard ratio of death was consistently higher in the most deprived group than the least deprived for both colon and rectal cancer, ranging from 1.08 to 1.17 depending on the model. On the net survival scale, the socioeconomic gap between the most and the least deprived groups reached approximately −4% at the maximum (−3.7%, 95% CI −1.6 to −5.7% in men, −3.6%, 95% CI −1.6 to −5.7% in women) in stages III for colon and approximately −2% (−2.3%, 95% CI −0.2 to −4.5% in men, −2.3%, 95% CI −0.2 to −4.3% in women) in stage II for rectal cancer at 3 years from diagnosis, after controlling for age, emergency presentation, receipt of resection and comorbidities. The gap was smaller in other stages and sites. For both cancers, patients with emergency presentation persistently had a higher excess hazard of death than those without emergency presentation. CONCLUSION: Survival disparities were profound particularly among patients in the stages, which benefit from appropriate and timely treatment. For the patients with emergency presentation, excess hazard of death remained high throughout three years from the diagnosis. Public health measures should be taken to reduce access inequalities to improve survival disparities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8588290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85882902021-11-23 Socioeconomic gaps over time in colorectal cancer survival in England: flexible parametric survival analysis Kajiwara Saito, Mari Quaresma, Manuela Fowler, Helen Benitez Majano, Sara Rachet, Bernard J Epidemiol Community Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Despite persistent reports of socioeconomic inequalities in colorectal cancer survival in England, the magnitude of survival differences has not been fully evaluated. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with colon cancer (n=68 169) and rectal cancer (n=38 267) in England (diagnosed between January 2010 and March 2013) were analysed as a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Registry data linked with other population-based healthcare records. The flexible parametric model incorporating time-varying covariates was used to assess the difference in excess hazard of death and in net survival between the most affluent and the most deprived groups over time. RESULTS: Survival analyses showed a clear pattern by deprivation. Hazard ratio of death was consistently higher in the most deprived group than the least deprived for both colon and rectal cancer, ranging from 1.08 to 1.17 depending on the model. On the net survival scale, the socioeconomic gap between the most and the least deprived groups reached approximately −4% at the maximum (−3.7%, 95% CI −1.6 to −5.7% in men, −3.6%, 95% CI −1.6 to −5.7% in women) in stages III for colon and approximately −2% (−2.3%, 95% CI −0.2 to −4.5% in men, −2.3%, 95% CI −0.2 to −4.3% in women) in stage II for rectal cancer at 3 years from diagnosis, after controlling for age, emergency presentation, receipt of resection and comorbidities. The gap was smaller in other stages and sites. For both cancers, patients with emergency presentation persistently had a higher excess hazard of death than those without emergency presentation. CONCLUSION: Survival disparities were profound particularly among patients in the stages, which benefit from appropriate and timely treatment. For the patients with emergency presentation, excess hazard of death remained high throughout three years from the diagnosis. Public health measures should be taken to reduce access inequalities to improve survival disparities. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8588290/ /pubmed/34049927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2021-216754 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kajiwara Saito, Mari
Quaresma, Manuela
Fowler, Helen
Benitez Majano, Sara
Rachet, Bernard
Socioeconomic gaps over time in colorectal cancer survival in England: flexible parametric survival analysis
title Socioeconomic gaps over time in colorectal cancer survival in England: flexible parametric survival analysis
title_full Socioeconomic gaps over time in colorectal cancer survival in England: flexible parametric survival analysis
title_fullStr Socioeconomic gaps over time in colorectal cancer survival in England: flexible parametric survival analysis
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic gaps over time in colorectal cancer survival in England: flexible parametric survival analysis
title_short Socioeconomic gaps over time in colorectal cancer survival in England: flexible parametric survival analysis
title_sort socioeconomic gaps over time in colorectal cancer survival in england: flexible parametric survival analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8588290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34049927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2021-216754
work_keys_str_mv AT kajiwarasaitomari socioeconomicgapsovertimeincolorectalcancersurvivalinenglandflexibleparametricsurvivalanalysis
AT quaresmamanuela socioeconomicgapsovertimeincolorectalcancersurvivalinenglandflexibleparametricsurvivalanalysis
AT fowlerhelen socioeconomicgapsovertimeincolorectalcancersurvivalinenglandflexibleparametricsurvivalanalysis
AT benitezmajanosara socioeconomicgapsovertimeincolorectalcancersurvivalinenglandflexibleparametricsurvivalanalysis
AT rachetbernard socioeconomicgapsovertimeincolorectalcancersurvivalinenglandflexibleparametricsurvivalanalysis