Cargando…

Effects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance

This preliminary investigation studied the effects of concurrent and terminal visual feedback during a standing balance task on ankle co-contraction, which was accomplished via surface electromyography of an agonist–antagonist muscle pair (medial gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles). Two com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vitali, Rachel V., Barone, Vincent J., Ferris, Jamie, Stirling, Leia A., Sienko, Kathleen H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8588392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34770611
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217305
_version_ 1784598445813661696
author Vitali, Rachel V.
Barone, Vincent J.
Ferris, Jamie
Stirling, Leia A.
Sienko, Kathleen H.
author_facet Vitali, Rachel V.
Barone, Vincent J.
Ferris, Jamie
Stirling, Leia A.
Sienko, Kathleen H.
author_sort Vitali, Rachel V.
collection PubMed
description This preliminary investigation studied the effects of concurrent and terminal visual feedback during a standing balance task on ankle co-contraction, which was accomplished via surface electromyography of an agonist–antagonist muscle pair (medial gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles). Two complementary mathematical definitions of co-contraction indices captured changes in ankle muscle recruitment and modulation strategies. Nineteen healthy older adults received both feedback types in a randomized order. Following an analysis of co-contraction index reliability as a function of surface electromyography normalization technique, linear mixed-effects regression analyses revealed participants learned or utilized different ankle co-contraction recruitment (i.e., relative muscle pair activity magnitudes) and modulation (i.e., absolute muscle pair activity magnitudes) strategies depending on feedback type and following the cessation of feedback use. Ankle co-contraction modulation increased when concurrent feedback was used and significantly decreased when concurrent feedback was removed. Ankle co-contraction recruitment and modulation did not significantly change when terminal feedback was used or when it was removed. Neither ankle co-contraction recruitment nor modulation was significantly different when concurrent feedback was used compared to when terminal feedback was used. The changes in ankle co-contraction recruitment and modulation were significantly different when concurrent feedback was removed as compared to when terminal feedback was removed. Finally, this study found a significant interaction between feedback type, removal of feedback, and order of use of feedback type. These results have implications for the design of balance training technologies using visual feedback.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8588392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85883922021-11-13 Effects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance Vitali, Rachel V. Barone, Vincent J. Ferris, Jamie Stirling, Leia A. Sienko, Kathleen H. Sensors (Basel) Article This preliminary investigation studied the effects of concurrent and terminal visual feedback during a standing balance task on ankle co-contraction, which was accomplished via surface electromyography of an agonist–antagonist muscle pair (medial gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles). Two complementary mathematical definitions of co-contraction indices captured changes in ankle muscle recruitment and modulation strategies. Nineteen healthy older adults received both feedback types in a randomized order. Following an analysis of co-contraction index reliability as a function of surface electromyography normalization technique, linear mixed-effects regression analyses revealed participants learned or utilized different ankle co-contraction recruitment (i.e., relative muscle pair activity magnitudes) and modulation (i.e., absolute muscle pair activity magnitudes) strategies depending on feedback type and following the cessation of feedback use. Ankle co-contraction modulation increased when concurrent feedback was used and significantly decreased when concurrent feedback was removed. Ankle co-contraction recruitment and modulation did not significantly change when terminal feedback was used or when it was removed. Neither ankle co-contraction recruitment nor modulation was significantly different when concurrent feedback was used compared to when terminal feedback was used. The changes in ankle co-contraction recruitment and modulation were significantly different when concurrent feedback was removed as compared to when terminal feedback was removed. Finally, this study found a significant interaction between feedback type, removal of feedback, and order of use of feedback type. These results have implications for the design of balance training technologies using visual feedback. MDPI 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8588392/ /pubmed/34770611 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217305 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vitali, Rachel V.
Barone, Vincent J.
Ferris, Jamie
Stirling, Leia A.
Sienko, Kathleen H.
Effects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance
title Effects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance
title_full Effects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance
title_fullStr Effects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance
title_short Effects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance
title_sort effects of concurrent and terminal visual feedback on ankle co-contraction in older adults during standing balance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8588392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34770611
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21217305
work_keys_str_mv AT vitalirachelv effectsofconcurrentandterminalvisualfeedbackonanklecocontractioninolderadultsduringstandingbalance
AT baronevincentj effectsofconcurrentandterminalvisualfeedbackonanklecocontractioninolderadultsduringstandingbalance
AT ferrisjamie effectsofconcurrentandterminalvisualfeedbackonanklecocontractioninolderadultsduringstandingbalance
AT stirlingleiaa effectsofconcurrentandterminalvisualfeedbackonanklecocontractioninolderadultsduringstandingbalance
AT sienkokathleenh effectsofconcurrentandterminalvisualfeedbackonanklecocontractioninolderadultsduringstandingbalance