Cargando…

Macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia after tricuspid or mitral valve surgery: is there difference in electrophysiological characteristics and effectiveness of catheter ablation?

BACKGROUND: Macro-reentrant atrial tachycardias (MATs) are a common complication after cardiac valve surgery. The MAT types and the effectiveness of MAT ablation might differ after different valve surgery. Data comparing the electrophysiological characteristics and the ablation results of MAT post-t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xin-hua, Kong, Ling-cong, Shuang, Tian, Li, Zheng, Pu, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8588703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02368-w
_version_ 1784598536068792320
author Wang, Xin-hua
Kong, Ling-cong
Shuang, Tian
Li, Zheng
Pu, Jun
author_facet Wang, Xin-hua
Kong, Ling-cong
Shuang, Tian
Li, Zheng
Pu, Jun
author_sort Wang, Xin-hua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Macro-reentrant atrial tachycardias (MATs) are a common complication after cardiac valve surgery. The MAT types and the effectiveness of MAT ablation might differ after different valve surgery. Data comparing the electrophysiological characteristics and the ablation results of MAT post-tricuspid or mitral valve surgery are limited. METHODS: Forty-eight patients (29 males, age 56.1 ± 13.3 years) with MAT after valve surgery were assigned to tricuspid valve (TV) group (n = 18) and mitral valve (MV) group (n = 30). MATs were mapped and ablated guided by a three-dimensional navigation system. The one-year clinical effectiveness was compared in two groups. RESULTS: Nineteen MATs were documented in TV group, including 16 cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent AFL and 3 other MATs at right atrial (RA) free wall, RA septum and left atrial (LA) roof. Thirty-nine MATs were identified in MV group, including15 CTI-dependent AFL, 8 RA free wall scar-related, 2 RA septum scar-related, 8 peri-mitral flutter, 3 LA roof-dependent, 2 LA anterior scar-related, and 1 right pulmonary vein-related MAT. Compared with TV group, MV group had significantly lower prevalence of CTI-dependent AFL (38.5% vs. 84.2%), higher prevalence of left atrial MAT (35.9 vs.5.3%) and higher proportion of patients with left atrial MAT (40 vs. 5.6%), P = 0.02, 0.01 and 0.01, respectively. The acute success rate of MAT ablation (100 vs. 93.3%) and the one-year freedom from atrial tachy-arrhythmias (72.2 vs. 76.5%) was comparable in TV and MV group. No predictor for recurrence was identified. CONCLUSION: Although the types of MATs differed significantly in patients with prior TV or MV surgery, the acute and mid-term effectiveness of MAT ablation was comparable in two groups. Trial registration: This study was registered as a part of EARLY-MYO-AF clinical trial at the website ClinicalTrials. gov (NCT04512222). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-021-02368-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8588703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85887032021-11-15 Macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia after tricuspid or mitral valve surgery: is there difference in electrophysiological characteristics and effectiveness of catheter ablation? Wang, Xin-hua Kong, Ling-cong Shuang, Tian Li, Zheng Pu, Jun BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research BACKGROUND: Macro-reentrant atrial tachycardias (MATs) are a common complication after cardiac valve surgery. The MAT types and the effectiveness of MAT ablation might differ after different valve surgery. Data comparing the electrophysiological characteristics and the ablation results of MAT post-tricuspid or mitral valve surgery are limited. METHODS: Forty-eight patients (29 males, age 56.1 ± 13.3 years) with MAT after valve surgery were assigned to tricuspid valve (TV) group (n = 18) and mitral valve (MV) group (n = 30). MATs were mapped and ablated guided by a three-dimensional navigation system. The one-year clinical effectiveness was compared in two groups. RESULTS: Nineteen MATs were documented in TV group, including 16 cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent AFL and 3 other MATs at right atrial (RA) free wall, RA septum and left atrial (LA) roof. Thirty-nine MATs were identified in MV group, including15 CTI-dependent AFL, 8 RA free wall scar-related, 2 RA septum scar-related, 8 peri-mitral flutter, 3 LA roof-dependent, 2 LA anterior scar-related, and 1 right pulmonary vein-related MAT. Compared with TV group, MV group had significantly lower prevalence of CTI-dependent AFL (38.5% vs. 84.2%), higher prevalence of left atrial MAT (35.9 vs.5.3%) and higher proportion of patients with left atrial MAT (40 vs. 5.6%), P = 0.02, 0.01 and 0.01, respectively. The acute success rate of MAT ablation (100 vs. 93.3%) and the one-year freedom from atrial tachy-arrhythmias (72.2 vs. 76.5%) was comparable in TV and MV group. No predictor for recurrence was identified. CONCLUSION: Although the types of MATs differed significantly in patients with prior TV or MV surgery, the acute and mid-term effectiveness of MAT ablation was comparable in two groups. Trial registration: This study was registered as a part of EARLY-MYO-AF clinical trial at the website ClinicalTrials. gov (NCT04512222). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-021-02368-w. BioMed Central 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8588703/ /pubmed/34772362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02368-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Xin-hua
Kong, Ling-cong
Shuang, Tian
Li, Zheng
Pu, Jun
Macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia after tricuspid or mitral valve surgery: is there difference in electrophysiological characteristics and effectiveness of catheter ablation?
title Macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia after tricuspid or mitral valve surgery: is there difference in electrophysiological characteristics and effectiveness of catheter ablation?
title_full Macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia after tricuspid or mitral valve surgery: is there difference in electrophysiological characteristics and effectiveness of catheter ablation?
title_fullStr Macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia after tricuspid or mitral valve surgery: is there difference in electrophysiological characteristics and effectiveness of catheter ablation?
title_full_unstemmed Macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia after tricuspid or mitral valve surgery: is there difference in electrophysiological characteristics and effectiveness of catheter ablation?
title_short Macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia after tricuspid or mitral valve surgery: is there difference in electrophysiological characteristics and effectiveness of catheter ablation?
title_sort macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia after tricuspid or mitral valve surgery: is there difference in electrophysiological characteristics and effectiveness of catheter ablation?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8588703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02368-w
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxinhua macroreentrantatrialtachycardiaaftertricuspidormitralvalvesurgeryistheredifferenceinelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsandeffectivenessofcatheterablation
AT konglingcong macroreentrantatrialtachycardiaaftertricuspidormitralvalvesurgeryistheredifferenceinelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsandeffectivenessofcatheterablation
AT shuangtian macroreentrantatrialtachycardiaaftertricuspidormitralvalvesurgeryistheredifferenceinelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsandeffectivenessofcatheterablation
AT lizheng macroreentrantatrialtachycardiaaftertricuspidormitralvalvesurgeryistheredifferenceinelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsandeffectivenessofcatheterablation
AT pujun macroreentrantatrialtachycardiaaftertricuspidormitralvalvesurgeryistheredifferenceinelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsandeffectivenessofcatheterablation