Cargando…

Measuring and monitoring patient safety in hospitals in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND: There is much variability in the measurement and monitoring of patient safety across healthcare organizations. With no recognized standardized approach, this study examines how the key components outlined in Vincent et al’s Measuring and Monitoring Safety (MMS) framework can be utilized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaud, Yazeed, Lydon, Sinéad, O’Connor, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8588732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07228-z
_version_ 1784598543782117376
author Kaud, Yazeed
Lydon, Sinéad
O’Connor, Paul
author_facet Kaud, Yazeed
Lydon, Sinéad
O’Connor, Paul
author_sort Kaud, Yazeed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is much variability in the measurement and monitoring of patient safety across healthcare organizations. With no recognized standardized approach, this study examines how the key components outlined in Vincent et al’s Measuring and Monitoring Safety (MMS) framework can be utilized to critically appraise a healthcare safety surveillance system. The aim of this study is to use the MMS framework to evaluate the Saudi Arabian healthcare safety surveillance system for hospital care. METHODS: This qualitative study consisted of two distinct phases. The first phase used document analysis to review national-level guidance relevant to measuring and monitoring safety in Saudi Arabia. The second phase consisted of semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders between May and August 2020 via a video conference call and focused on exploring their knowledge of how patient safety is measured and monitored in hospitals. The MMS framework was used to support data analysis. RESULTS: Three documents were included for analysis and 21 semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders working in the Saudi Arabian healthcare system. A total of 39 unique methods of MMS were identified, with one method of MMS addressing two dimensions. Of these MMS methods: 10 (25 %) were concerned with past harm; 14 (35 %) were concerned with the reliability of safety critical processes, 3 (7.5 %) were concerned with sensitivity to operations, 2 (5 %) were concerned with anticipation and preparedness, and 11 (27.5 %) were concerned with integration and learning. CONCLUSIONS: The document analysis and interviews show an extensive system of MMS is in place in Saudi Arabian hospitals. The assessment of MMS offers a useful framework to help healthcare organizations and researchers to think critically about MMS, and how the data from different methods of MMS can be integrated in individual countries or health systems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07228-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8588732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85887322021-11-15 Measuring and monitoring patient safety in hospitals in Saudi Arabia Kaud, Yazeed Lydon, Sinéad O’Connor, Paul BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: There is much variability in the measurement and monitoring of patient safety across healthcare organizations. With no recognized standardized approach, this study examines how the key components outlined in Vincent et al’s Measuring and Monitoring Safety (MMS) framework can be utilized to critically appraise a healthcare safety surveillance system. The aim of this study is to use the MMS framework to evaluate the Saudi Arabian healthcare safety surveillance system for hospital care. METHODS: This qualitative study consisted of two distinct phases. The first phase used document analysis to review national-level guidance relevant to measuring and monitoring safety in Saudi Arabia. The second phase consisted of semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders between May and August 2020 via a video conference call and focused on exploring their knowledge of how patient safety is measured and monitored in hospitals. The MMS framework was used to support data analysis. RESULTS: Three documents were included for analysis and 21 semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders working in the Saudi Arabian healthcare system. A total of 39 unique methods of MMS were identified, with one method of MMS addressing two dimensions. Of these MMS methods: 10 (25 %) were concerned with past harm; 14 (35 %) were concerned with the reliability of safety critical processes, 3 (7.5 %) were concerned with sensitivity to operations, 2 (5 %) were concerned with anticipation and preparedness, and 11 (27.5 %) were concerned with integration and learning. CONCLUSIONS: The document analysis and interviews show an extensive system of MMS is in place in Saudi Arabian hospitals. The assessment of MMS offers a useful framework to help healthcare organizations and researchers to think critically about MMS, and how the data from different methods of MMS can be integrated in individual countries or health systems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07228-z. BioMed Central 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8588732/ /pubmed/34772409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07228-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kaud, Yazeed
Lydon, Sinéad
O’Connor, Paul
Measuring and monitoring patient safety in hospitals in Saudi Arabia
title Measuring and monitoring patient safety in hospitals in Saudi Arabia
title_full Measuring and monitoring patient safety in hospitals in Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr Measuring and monitoring patient safety in hospitals in Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed Measuring and monitoring patient safety in hospitals in Saudi Arabia
title_short Measuring and monitoring patient safety in hospitals in Saudi Arabia
title_sort measuring and monitoring patient safety in hospitals in saudi arabia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8588732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07228-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kaudyazeed measuringandmonitoringpatientsafetyinhospitalsinsaudiarabia
AT lydonsinead measuringandmonitoringpatientsafetyinhospitalsinsaudiarabia
AT oconnorpaul measuringandmonitoringpatientsafetyinhospitalsinsaudiarabia