Cargando…

Distal Femoral Replacement as a Primary Treatment Method for Distal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly

Distal femoral fractures account for 3-6% of all femoral fractures with a similar demographic as patients suffering from proximal femoral fractures. The mortality risk can be high in such injuries, which has prompted NHS England to extend the scope of the Best Practice Tariff to include all fragilit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onubogu, Ifeanyi K, Relwani, Sanjana, Grewal, Urpinder S, Bhamra, Jagmeet S, Reddy, Kumar Gaddam, Dhinsa, Baljinder S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790497
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18752
_version_ 1784598613319483392
author Onubogu, Ifeanyi K
Relwani, Sanjana
Grewal, Urpinder S
Bhamra, Jagmeet S
Reddy, Kumar Gaddam
Dhinsa, Baljinder S
author_facet Onubogu, Ifeanyi K
Relwani, Sanjana
Grewal, Urpinder S
Bhamra, Jagmeet S
Reddy, Kumar Gaddam
Dhinsa, Baljinder S
author_sort Onubogu, Ifeanyi K
collection PubMed
description Distal femoral fractures account for 3-6% of all femoral fractures with a similar demographic as patients suffering from proximal femoral fractures. The mortality risk can be high in such injuries, which has prompted NHS England to extend the scope of the Best Practice Tariff to include all fragility fractures of the femur. Poor bone quality, intra-articular extension, and significant comminution can make these fractures difficult to manage with fixation techniques, while early mobilisation is a key outcome in the treatment of this injury. In this study, a comprehensive literature search was performed based on keywords, and abstracts were reviewed to identify relevant articles. The following factors were analysed: time to surgery, time to full weight-bearing, the average hospital stay, post-operative mobility status, and complications. A total of 233 abstracts were identified using the pre-determined search criteria, and, subsequently, articles were excluded following author review. A total of 10 relevant articles were included in this review, with five used for review and comparison between distal femoral replacement (DFR) and fixation. This resulted in a sample of 200 patients treated with DFR with over 87% ambulatory at follow-up and a re-operation rate of 13.3% compared to 78% and 13.5%, respectively, in those treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) procedure. Despite a limited pool of evidence, the literature suggests that DFR offers an option that potentially allows immediate weight-bearing and leaves most patients ambulatory at follow-up. Although DFR is more costly than other operative techniques, it avoids complications associated with fixation such as non-union and can reduce the risk of further surgery through direct complications or a need for delayed arthroplasty, which is deemed more complex secondary to fixation. Early mobilisation is a key step in reducing morbidity and mortality among this cohort of patients, and a procedure such as DFR should be more widely considered to help achieve this outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8589001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85890012021-11-16 Distal Femoral Replacement as a Primary Treatment Method for Distal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly Onubogu, Ifeanyi K Relwani, Sanjana Grewal, Urpinder S Bhamra, Jagmeet S Reddy, Kumar Gaddam Dhinsa, Baljinder S Cureus Orthopedics Distal femoral fractures account for 3-6% of all femoral fractures with a similar demographic as patients suffering from proximal femoral fractures. The mortality risk can be high in such injuries, which has prompted NHS England to extend the scope of the Best Practice Tariff to include all fragility fractures of the femur. Poor bone quality, intra-articular extension, and significant comminution can make these fractures difficult to manage with fixation techniques, while early mobilisation is a key outcome in the treatment of this injury. In this study, a comprehensive literature search was performed based on keywords, and abstracts were reviewed to identify relevant articles. The following factors were analysed: time to surgery, time to full weight-bearing, the average hospital stay, post-operative mobility status, and complications. A total of 233 abstracts were identified using the pre-determined search criteria, and, subsequently, articles were excluded following author review. A total of 10 relevant articles were included in this review, with five used for review and comparison between distal femoral replacement (DFR) and fixation. This resulted in a sample of 200 patients treated with DFR with over 87% ambulatory at follow-up and a re-operation rate of 13.3% compared to 78% and 13.5%, respectively, in those treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) procedure. Despite a limited pool of evidence, the literature suggests that DFR offers an option that potentially allows immediate weight-bearing and leaves most patients ambulatory at follow-up. Although DFR is more costly than other operative techniques, it avoids complications associated with fixation such as non-union and can reduce the risk of further surgery through direct complications or a need for delayed arthroplasty, which is deemed more complex secondary to fixation. Early mobilisation is a key step in reducing morbidity and mortality among this cohort of patients, and a procedure such as DFR should be more widely considered to help achieve this outcome. Cureus 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8589001/ /pubmed/34790497 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18752 Text en Copyright © 2021, Onubogu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Onubogu, Ifeanyi K
Relwani, Sanjana
Grewal, Urpinder S
Bhamra, Jagmeet S
Reddy, Kumar Gaddam
Dhinsa, Baljinder S
Distal Femoral Replacement as a Primary Treatment Method for Distal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly
title Distal Femoral Replacement as a Primary Treatment Method for Distal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly
title_full Distal Femoral Replacement as a Primary Treatment Method for Distal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly
title_fullStr Distal Femoral Replacement as a Primary Treatment Method for Distal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly
title_full_unstemmed Distal Femoral Replacement as a Primary Treatment Method for Distal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly
title_short Distal Femoral Replacement as a Primary Treatment Method for Distal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly
title_sort distal femoral replacement as a primary treatment method for distal femoral fractures in the elderly
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790497
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18752
work_keys_str_mv AT onuboguifeanyik distalfemoralreplacementasaprimarytreatmentmethodfordistalfemoralfracturesintheelderly
AT relwanisanjana distalfemoralreplacementasaprimarytreatmentmethodfordistalfemoralfracturesintheelderly
AT grewalurpinders distalfemoralreplacementasaprimarytreatmentmethodfordistalfemoralfracturesintheelderly
AT bhamrajagmeets distalfemoralreplacementasaprimarytreatmentmethodfordistalfemoralfracturesintheelderly
AT reddykumargaddam distalfemoralreplacementasaprimarytreatmentmethodfordistalfemoralfracturesintheelderly
AT dhinsabaljinders distalfemoralreplacementasaprimarytreatmentmethodfordistalfemoralfracturesintheelderly