Cargando…
Distal Femoral Replacement as a Primary Treatment Method for Distal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly
Distal femoral fractures account for 3-6% of all femoral fractures with a similar demographic as patients suffering from proximal femoral fractures. The mortality risk can be high in such injuries, which has prompted NHS England to extend the scope of the Best Practice Tariff to include all fragilit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790497 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18752 |
_version_ | 1784598613319483392 |
---|---|
author | Onubogu, Ifeanyi K Relwani, Sanjana Grewal, Urpinder S Bhamra, Jagmeet S Reddy, Kumar Gaddam Dhinsa, Baljinder S |
author_facet | Onubogu, Ifeanyi K Relwani, Sanjana Grewal, Urpinder S Bhamra, Jagmeet S Reddy, Kumar Gaddam Dhinsa, Baljinder S |
author_sort | Onubogu, Ifeanyi K |
collection | PubMed |
description | Distal femoral fractures account for 3-6% of all femoral fractures with a similar demographic as patients suffering from proximal femoral fractures. The mortality risk can be high in such injuries, which has prompted NHS England to extend the scope of the Best Practice Tariff to include all fragility fractures of the femur. Poor bone quality, intra-articular extension, and significant comminution can make these fractures difficult to manage with fixation techniques, while early mobilisation is a key outcome in the treatment of this injury. In this study, a comprehensive literature search was performed based on keywords, and abstracts were reviewed to identify relevant articles. The following factors were analysed: time to surgery, time to full weight-bearing, the average hospital stay, post-operative mobility status, and complications. A total of 233 abstracts were identified using the pre-determined search criteria, and, subsequently, articles were excluded following author review. A total of 10 relevant articles were included in this review, with five used for review and comparison between distal femoral replacement (DFR) and fixation. This resulted in a sample of 200 patients treated with DFR with over 87% ambulatory at follow-up and a re-operation rate of 13.3% compared to 78% and 13.5%, respectively, in those treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) procedure. Despite a limited pool of evidence, the literature suggests that DFR offers an option that potentially allows immediate weight-bearing and leaves most patients ambulatory at follow-up. Although DFR is more costly than other operative techniques, it avoids complications associated with fixation such as non-union and can reduce the risk of further surgery through direct complications or a need for delayed arthroplasty, which is deemed more complex secondary to fixation. Early mobilisation is a key step in reducing morbidity and mortality among this cohort of patients, and a procedure such as DFR should be more widely considered to help achieve this outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8589001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85890012021-11-16 Distal Femoral Replacement as a Primary Treatment Method for Distal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly Onubogu, Ifeanyi K Relwani, Sanjana Grewal, Urpinder S Bhamra, Jagmeet S Reddy, Kumar Gaddam Dhinsa, Baljinder S Cureus Orthopedics Distal femoral fractures account for 3-6% of all femoral fractures with a similar demographic as patients suffering from proximal femoral fractures. The mortality risk can be high in such injuries, which has prompted NHS England to extend the scope of the Best Practice Tariff to include all fragility fractures of the femur. Poor bone quality, intra-articular extension, and significant comminution can make these fractures difficult to manage with fixation techniques, while early mobilisation is a key outcome in the treatment of this injury. In this study, a comprehensive literature search was performed based on keywords, and abstracts were reviewed to identify relevant articles. The following factors were analysed: time to surgery, time to full weight-bearing, the average hospital stay, post-operative mobility status, and complications. A total of 233 abstracts were identified using the pre-determined search criteria, and, subsequently, articles were excluded following author review. A total of 10 relevant articles were included in this review, with five used for review and comparison between distal femoral replacement (DFR) and fixation. This resulted in a sample of 200 patients treated with DFR with over 87% ambulatory at follow-up and a re-operation rate of 13.3% compared to 78% and 13.5%, respectively, in those treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) procedure. Despite a limited pool of evidence, the literature suggests that DFR offers an option that potentially allows immediate weight-bearing and leaves most patients ambulatory at follow-up. Although DFR is more costly than other operative techniques, it avoids complications associated with fixation such as non-union and can reduce the risk of further surgery through direct complications or a need for delayed arthroplasty, which is deemed more complex secondary to fixation. Early mobilisation is a key step in reducing morbidity and mortality among this cohort of patients, and a procedure such as DFR should be more widely considered to help achieve this outcome. Cureus 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8589001/ /pubmed/34790497 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18752 Text en Copyright © 2021, Onubogu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Orthopedics Onubogu, Ifeanyi K Relwani, Sanjana Grewal, Urpinder S Bhamra, Jagmeet S Reddy, Kumar Gaddam Dhinsa, Baljinder S Distal Femoral Replacement as a Primary Treatment Method for Distal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly |
title | Distal Femoral Replacement as a Primary Treatment Method for Distal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly |
title_full | Distal Femoral Replacement as a Primary Treatment Method for Distal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly |
title_fullStr | Distal Femoral Replacement as a Primary Treatment Method for Distal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly |
title_full_unstemmed | Distal Femoral Replacement as a Primary Treatment Method for Distal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly |
title_short | Distal Femoral Replacement as a Primary Treatment Method for Distal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly |
title_sort | distal femoral replacement as a primary treatment method for distal femoral fractures in the elderly |
topic | Orthopedics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790497 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18752 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT onuboguifeanyik distalfemoralreplacementasaprimarytreatmentmethodfordistalfemoralfracturesintheelderly AT relwanisanjana distalfemoralreplacementasaprimarytreatmentmethodfordistalfemoralfracturesintheelderly AT grewalurpinders distalfemoralreplacementasaprimarytreatmentmethodfordistalfemoralfracturesintheelderly AT bhamrajagmeets distalfemoralreplacementasaprimarytreatmentmethodfordistalfemoralfracturesintheelderly AT reddykumargaddam distalfemoralreplacementasaprimarytreatmentmethodfordistalfemoralfracturesintheelderly AT dhinsabaljinders distalfemoralreplacementasaprimarytreatmentmethodfordistalfemoralfracturesintheelderly |