Cargando…

Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Grapevine Rootstock in Response to Waterlogging Stress

Waterlogging severely affects global agricultural production. Clarifying the regulatory mechanism of grapevine in response to waterlogging stress will help to improve the waterlogging tolerance of grapevine. In the present study, the physiological and proteomic responses of SO4 grapevine rootstock t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xicheng, Yan, Lichun, Wang, Bo, Qian, Yaming, Wang, Zhuangwei, Wu, Weimin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777428
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.749184
_version_ 1784598619745157120
author Wang, Xicheng
Yan, Lichun
Wang, Bo
Qian, Yaming
Wang, Zhuangwei
Wu, Weimin
author_facet Wang, Xicheng
Yan, Lichun
Wang, Bo
Qian, Yaming
Wang, Zhuangwei
Wu, Weimin
author_sort Wang, Xicheng
collection PubMed
description Waterlogging severely affects global agricultural production. Clarifying the regulatory mechanism of grapevine in response to waterlogging stress will help to improve the waterlogging tolerance of grapevine. In the present study, the physiological and proteomic responses of SO4 grapevine rootstock to different waterlogging tolerances were comparatively assayed. The results showed that the activities of SOD and POD first increased and then decreased, while the change trend of CAT and APX activities was the opposite. In addition, the MDA and H(2)O(2) contents increased after waterlogging treatment, but the chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contents decreased. A total of 5,578 grapevine proteins were identified by the use of the tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling technique. Among them, 214 (103 and 111 whose expression was upregulated and downregulated, respectively), 314 (129 and 185 whose expression was upregulated and downregulated, respectively), and 529 (248 and 281 whose expression was upregulated and downregulated, respectively) differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified in T0d vs. T10d, T10d vs. T20d, and T0d vs. T20d comparison groups, respectively. Enrichment analysis showed that these DEPs were mainly involved in glutathione metabolism, carbon fixation, amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, biosynthesis of amino acids, photosynthesis, carbon metabolism, starch, and sucrose metabolism, galactose metabolism, protein processing and ribosomes. To further verify the proteomic data, the expression of corresponding genes that encode eight DEPs was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The results of this study presented an important step toward understanding the resistance mechanisms of grapevine in response to waterlogging stress at the proteome level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8589030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85890302021-11-13 Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Grapevine Rootstock in Response to Waterlogging Stress Wang, Xicheng Yan, Lichun Wang, Bo Qian, Yaming Wang, Zhuangwei Wu, Weimin Front Plant Sci Plant Science Waterlogging severely affects global agricultural production. Clarifying the regulatory mechanism of grapevine in response to waterlogging stress will help to improve the waterlogging tolerance of grapevine. In the present study, the physiological and proteomic responses of SO4 grapevine rootstock to different waterlogging tolerances were comparatively assayed. The results showed that the activities of SOD and POD first increased and then decreased, while the change trend of CAT and APX activities was the opposite. In addition, the MDA and H(2)O(2) contents increased after waterlogging treatment, but the chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contents decreased. A total of 5,578 grapevine proteins were identified by the use of the tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling technique. Among them, 214 (103 and 111 whose expression was upregulated and downregulated, respectively), 314 (129 and 185 whose expression was upregulated and downregulated, respectively), and 529 (248 and 281 whose expression was upregulated and downregulated, respectively) differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified in T0d vs. T10d, T10d vs. T20d, and T0d vs. T20d comparison groups, respectively. Enrichment analysis showed that these DEPs were mainly involved in glutathione metabolism, carbon fixation, amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, biosynthesis of amino acids, photosynthesis, carbon metabolism, starch, and sucrose metabolism, galactose metabolism, protein processing and ribosomes. To further verify the proteomic data, the expression of corresponding genes that encode eight DEPs was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The results of this study presented an important step toward understanding the resistance mechanisms of grapevine in response to waterlogging stress at the proteome level. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8589030/ /pubmed/34777428 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.749184 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wang, Yan, Wang, Qian, Wang and Wu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Wang, Xicheng
Yan, Lichun
Wang, Bo
Qian, Yaming
Wang, Zhuangwei
Wu, Weimin
Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Grapevine Rootstock in Response to Waterlogging Stress
title Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Grapevine Rootstock in Response to Waterlogging Stress
title_full Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Grapevine Rootstock in Response to Waterlogging Stress
title_fullStr Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Grapevine Rootstock in Response to Waterlogging Stress
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Grapevine Rootstock in Response to Waterlogging Stress
title_short Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Grapevine Rootstock in Response to Waterlogging Stress
title_sort comparative proteomic analysis of grapevine rootstock in response to waterlogging stress
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777428
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.749184
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxicheng comparativeproteomicanalysisofgrapevinerootstockinresponsetowaterloggingstress
AT yanlichun comparativeproteomicanalysisofgrapevinerootstockinresponsetowaterloggingstress
AT wangbo comparativeproteomicanalysisofgrapevinerootstockinresponsetowaterloggingstress
AT qianyaming comparativeproteomicanalysisofgrapevinerootstockinresponsetowaterloggingstress
AT wangzhuangwei comparativeproteomicanalysisofgrapevinerootstockinresponsetowaterloggingstress
AT wuweimin comparativeproteomicanalysisofgrapevinerootstockinresponsetowaterloggingstress