Cargando…
Ensuring Quality and Status: Peer Review Practices in Kriterium, A Portal for Quality-Marked Monographs and Edited Volumes in Swedish SSH
Although established forms of peer review are often criticized for being slow, secretive, and even unfair, they are repeatedly mentioned by academics as the most important indicator of quality in scholarly publishing. In many countries, the peer review of books is a less codified practice than that...
Autores principales: | Hammarfelt, Björn, Hammar, Isak, Francke, Helena |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34778695 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.740297 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Peer Review in Law Journals
por: Stojanovski, Jadranka, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The Uptake and Impact of a Label for Peer-Reviewed Books
por: Vandewalle, Eline, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Development of a Methodological Quality Criteria List for Observational Studies: The Observational Study Quality Evaluation
por: Drukker, Marjan, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Does Peer Reviewing for COVID-19-Related Papers Still Work?
por: Orellana-Serradell, Octavio, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Editorial: Quality and quantity in research assessment: Examining the merits of metrics
por: Montazerian, Maziar, et al.
Publicado: (2022)