Cargando…

Clinical Use of Surface Electromyography to Track Acute Upper Extremity Muscle Recovery after Stroke: A Descriptive Case Study of a Single Patient

Arm recovery varies greatly among stroke survivors. Wearable surface electromyography (sEMG) sensors have been used to track recovery in research; however, sEMG is rarely used within acute and subacute clinical settings. The purpose of this case study was to describe the use of wireless sEMG sensors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feldner, Heather A., Papazian, Christina, Peters, Keshia M., Creutzfeldt, Claire J., Steele, Katherine M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34778722
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/asi4020032
_version_ 1784598665872015360
author Feldner, Heather A.
Papazian, Christina
Peters, Keshia M.
Creutzfeldt, Claire J.
Steele, Katherine M.
author_facet Feldner, Heather A.
Papazian, Christina
Peters, Keshia M.
Creutzfeldt, Claire J.
Steele, Katherine M.
author_sort Feldner, Heather A.
collection PubMed
description Arm recovery varies greatly among stroke survivors. Wearable surface electromyography (sEMG) sensors have been used to track recovery in research; however, sEMG is rarely used within acute and subacute clinical settings. The purpose of this case study was to describe the use of wireless sEMG sensors to examine changes in muscle activity during acute and subacute phases of stroke recovery, and understand the participant’s perceptions of sEMG monitoring. Beginning three days post-stroke, one stroke survivor wore five wireless sEMG sensors on his involved arm for three to four hours, every one to three days. Muscle activity was tracked during routine care in the acute setting through discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Three- and eight-month follow-up sessions were completed in the community. Activity logs were completed each session, and a semi-structured interview occurred at the final session. The longitudinal monitoring of muscle and movement recovery in the clinic and community was feasible using sEMG sensors. The participant and medical team felt monitoring was unobtrusive, interesting, and motivating for recovery, but desired greater in-session feedback to inform rehabilitation. While barriers in equipment and signal quality still exist, capitalizing on wearable sensing technology in the clinic holds promise for enabling personalized stroke recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8589300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85893002021-11-12 Clinical Use of Surface Electromyography to Track Acute Upper Extremity Muscle Recovery after Stroke: A Descriptive Case Study of a Single Patient Feldner, Heather A. Papazian, Christina Peters, Keshia M. Creutzfeldt, Claire J. Steele, Katherine M. Appl Syst Innov Article Arm recovery varies greatly among stroke survivors. Wearable surface electromyography (sEMG) sensors have been used to track recovery in research; however, sEMG is rarely used within acute and subacute clinical settings. The purpose of this case study was to describe the use of wireless sEMG sensors to examine changes in muscle activity during acute and subacute phases of stroke recovery, and understand the participant’s perceptions of sEMG monitoring. Beginning three days post-stroke, one stroke survivor wore five wireless sEMG sensors on his involved arm for three to four hours, every one to three days. Muscle activity was tracked during routine care in the acute setting through discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Three- and eight-month follow-up sessions were completed in the community. Activity logs were completed each session, and a semi-structured interview occurred at the final session. The longitudinal monitoring of muscle and movement recovery in the clinic and community was feasible using sEMG sensors. The participant and medical team felt monitoring was unobtrusive, interesting, and motivating for recovery, but desired greater in-session feedback to inform rehabilitation. While barriers in equipment and signal quality still exist, capitalizing on wearable sensing technology in the clinic holds promise for enabling personalized stroke recovery. 2021-05-10 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8589300/ /pubmed/34778722 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/asi4020032 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Feldner, Heather A.
Papazian, Christina
Peters, Keshia M.
Creutzfeldt, Claire J.
Steele, Katherine M.
Clinical Use of Surface Electromyography to Track Acute Upper Extremity Muscle Recovery after Stroke: A Descriptive Case Study of a Single Patient
title Clinical Use of Surface Electromyography to Track Acute Upper Extremity Muscle Recovery after Stroke: A Descriptive Case Study of a Single Patient
title_full Clinical Use of Surface Electromyography to Track Acute Upper Extremity Muscle Recovery after Stroke: A Descriptive Case Study of a Single Patient
title_fullStr Clinical Use of Surface Electromyography to Track Acute Upper Extremity Muscle Recovery after Stroke: A Descriptive Case Study of a Single Patient
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Use of Surface Electromyography to Track Acute Upper Extremity Muscle Recovery after Stroke: A Descriptive Case Study of a Single Patient
title_short Clinical Use of Surface Electromyography to Track Acute Upper Extremity Muscle Recovery after Stroke: A Descriptive Case Study of a Single Patient
title_sort clinical use of surface electromyography to track acute upper extremity muscle recovery after stroke: a descriptive case study of a single patient
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34778722
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/asi4020032
work_keys_str_mv AT feldnerheathera clinicaluseofsurfaceelectromyographytotrackacuteupperextremitymusclerecoveryafterstrokeadescriptivecasestudyofasinglepatient
AT papazianchristina clinicaluseofsurfaceelectromyographytotrackacuteupperextremitymusclerecoveryafterstrokeadescriptivecasestudyofasinglepatient
AT peterskeshiam clinicaluseofsurfaceelectromyographytotrackacuteupperextremitymusclerecoveryafterstrokeadescriptivecasestudyofasinglepatient
AT creutzfeldtclairej clinicaluseofsurfaceelectromyographytotrackacuteupperextremitymusclerecoveryafterstrokeadescriptivecasestudyofasinglepatient
AT steelekatherinem clinicaluseofsurfaceelectromyographytotrackacuteupperextremitymusclerecoveryafterstrokeadescriptivecasestudyofasinglepatient