Cargando…

Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of phytic acid (IP6) on the surface roughness and microhardness of human root canal dentin and compare it to other smear layer removal agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty extracted human maxillary incisors were sectioned longitudinally into a total of 100 specimens f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muana, Hosea Lalrin, Nassar, Mohannad, Dargham, Ahmad, Hiraishi, Noriko, Tagami, Junji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.05.001
_version_ 1784598759716421632
author Muana, Hosea Lalrin
Nassar, Mohannad
Dargham, Ahmad
Hiraishi, Noriko
Tagami, Junji
author_facet Muana, Hosea Lalrin
Nassar, Mohannad
Dargham, Ahmad
Hiraishi, Noriko
Tagami, Junji
author_sort Muana, Hosea Lalrin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of phytic acid (IP6) on the surface roughness and microhardness of human root canal dentin and compare it to other smear layer removal agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty extracted human maxillary incisors were sectioned longitudinally into a total of 100 specimens followed by embedding in auto-polymerizing acrylic resin. The specimens were polished and then randomly divided into five groups (n = 20) according to the test solution used to condition root canal dentin: 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); 10% citric acid (CA); 1% IP6; 37% phosphoric acid (PA); or distilled water (control group). Each specimen was treated with a total volume of 1 ml of each solution for 1 min with agitation. Each group was then divided into two subgroups of 10 specimens each. The specimens of the first subgroup were used to determine microhardness, using Vickers hardness tester, and the specimens of the second subgroup were used to measure surface roughness, using a confocal laser scanning microscope. The results were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests, α = 0.05. RESULTS: All the tested groups exhibited microhardness and surface roughness values that were statistically significantly different when compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The microhardness value obtained with IP6 was significantly lower when compared to EDTA, CA, and the control group, whereas its roughness value was significantly higher compared to the aforementioned groups. However, there was no significant difference between IP6 and PA (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IP6 and PA showed the lowest microhardness and the highest surface roughness values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8589586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85895862021-11-19 Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin Muana, Hosea Lalrin Nassar, Mohannad Dargham, Ahmad Hiraishi, Noriko Tagami, Junji Saudi Dent J Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of phytic acid (IP6) on the surface roughness and microhardness of human root canal dentin and compare it to other smear layer removal agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty extracted human maxillary incisors were sectioned longitudinally into a total of 100 specimens followed by embedding in auto-polymerizing acrylic resin. The specimens were polished and then randomly divided into five groups (n = 20) according to the test solution used to condition root canal dentin: 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); 10% citric acid (CA); 1% IP6; 37% phosphoric acid (PA); or distilled water (control group). Each specimen was treated with a total volume of 1 ml of each solution for 1 min with agitation. Each group was then divided into two subgroups of 10 specimens each. The specimens of the first subgroup were used to determine microhardness, using Vickers hardness tester, and the specimens of the second subgroup were used to measure surface roughness, using a confocal laser scanning microscope. The results were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests, α = 0.05. RESULTS: All the tested groups exhibited microhardness and surface roughness values that were statistically significantly different when compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The microhardness value obtained with IP6 was significantly lower when compared to EDTA, CA, and the control group, whereas its roughness value was significantly higher compared to the aforementioned groups. However, there was no significant difference between IP6 and PA (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IP6 and PA showed the lowest microhardness and the highest surface roughness values. Elsevier 2021-11 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8589586/ /pubmed/34803316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.05.001 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Muana, Hosea Lalrin
Nassar, Mohannad
Dargham, Ahmad
Hiraishi, Noriko
Tagami, Junji
Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin
title Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin
title_full Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin
title_fullStr Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin
title_full_unstemmed Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin
title_short Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin
title_sort effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.05.001
work_keys_str_mv AT muanahosealalrin effectofsmearlayerremovalagentsonthemicrohardnessandroughnessofradiculardentin
AT nassarmohannad effectofsmearlayerremovalagentsonthemicrohardnessandroughnessofradiculardentin
AT darghamahmad effectofsmearlayerremovalagentsonthemicrohardnessandroughnessofradiculardentin
AT hiraishinoriko effectofsmearlayerremovalagentsonthemicrohardnessandroughnessofradiculardentin
AT tagamijunji effectofsmearlayerremovalagentsonthemicrohardnessandroughnessofradiculardentin