Cargando…

Is titanium–zirconium alloy a better alternative to pure titanium for oral implant? Composition, mechanical properties, and microstructure analysis

INTRODUCTION: Titanium (Ti) is widely accepted as a biomaterial for orthopaedic and dental implants, primarily due to its capacity to integrate directly into the bone and its superior corrosion resistance. It has been suggested that titanium–zirconium alloy (TiZr), with 13–17% of zirconium, has bett...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Ajay, Waddell, John N., Li, Kai C., A Sharma, Lavanya, Prior, David J., Duncan, Warwick J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.08.009
_version_ 1784598759949205504
author Sharma, Ajay
Waddell, John N.
Li, Kai C.
A Sharma, Lavanya
Prior, David J.
Duncan, Warwick J.
author_facet Sharma, Ajay
Waddell, John N.
Li, Kai C.
A Sharma, Lavanya
Prior, David J.
Duncan, Warwick J.
author_sort Sharma, Ajay
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Titanium (Ti) is widely accepted as a biomaterial for orthopaedic and dental implants, primarily due to its capacity to integrate directly into the bone and its superior corrosion resistance. It has been suggested that titanium–zirconium alloy (TiZr), with 13–17% of zirconium, has better mechanical properties than pure Ti, but there are very few published studies assessing the suitability of TiZr for high-load- bearing implants. This study aimed to compare the mechanical properties and microstructures of TiZr and commercially pure titanium (Ti). METHODOLOGY: Pure Ti and TiZr alloy discs were prepared and subjected to characterisation by nanoindentation, electron dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). RESULTS: The TiZr alloy was found to have significantly lower elastic modulus value (p < 0.0001) and greater hardness than Ti (p < 0.05). The EDS results confirmed the presence of Zr (13–17%) in the TiZr alloy, with XRD and EBSD images showing microstructure with the alpha phase similar to commercially available Ti. CONCLUSION: The lower elastic modulus, higher hardness, presence of alpha phase, and the finer grain size of the TiZr alloy make it more suitable for high-load-bearing implants compared to commercially available Ti and is likely to encourage a positive biological response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8589587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85895872021-11-19 Is titanium–zirconium alloy a better alternative to pure titanium for oral implant? Composition, mechanical properties, and microstructure analysis Sharma, Ajay Waddell, John N. Li, Kai C. A Sharma, Lavanya Prior, David J. Duncan, Warwick J. Saudi Dent J Original Article INTRODUCTION: Titanium (Ti) is widely accepted as a biomaterial for orthopaedic and dental implants, primarily due to its capacity to integrate directly into the bone and its superior corrosion resistance. It has been suggested that titanium–zirconium alloy (TiZr), with 13–17% of zirconium, has better mechanical properties than pure Ti, but there are very few published studies assessing the suitability of TiZr for high-load- bearing implants. This study aimed to compare the mechanical properties and microstructures of TiZr and commercially pure titanium (Ti). METHODOLOGY: Pure Ti and TiZr alloy discs were prepared and subjected to characterisation by nanoindentation, electron dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). RESULTS: The TiZr alloy was found to have significantly lower elastic modulus value (p < 0.0001) and greater hardness than Ti (p < 0.05). The EDS results confirmed the presence of Zr (13–17%) in the TiZr alloy, with XRD and EBSD images showing microstructure with the alpha phase similar to commercially available Ti. CONCLUSION: The lower elastic modulus, higher hardness, presence of alpha phase, and the finer grain size of the TiZr alloy make it more suitable for high-load-bearing implants compared to commercially available Ti and is likely to encourage a positive biological response. Elsevier 2021-11 2020-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8589587/ /pubmed/34803299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.08.009 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Ajay
Waddell, John N.
Li, Kai C.
A Sharma, Lavanya
Prior, David J.
Duncan, Warwick J.
Is titanium–zirconium alloy a better alternative to pure titanium for oral implant? Composition, mechanical properties, and microstructure analysis
title Is titanium–zirconium alloy a better alternative to pure titanium for oral implant? Composition, mechanical properties, and microstructure analysis
title_full Is titanium–zirconium alloy a better alternative to pure titanium for oral implant? Composition, mechanical properties, and microstructure analysis
title_fullStr Is titanium–zirconium alloy a better alternative to pure titanium for oral implant? Composition, mechanical properties, and microstructure analysis
title_full_unstemmed Is titanium–zirconium alloy a better alternative to pure titanium for oral implant? Composition, mechanical properties, and microstructure analysis
title_short Is titanium–zirconium alloy a better alternative to pure titanium for oral implant? Composition, mechanical properties, and microstructure analysis
title_sort is titanium–zirconium alloy a better alternative to pure titanium for oral implant? composition, mechanical properties, and microstructure analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.08.009
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaajay istitaniumzirconiumalloyabetteralternativetopuretitaniumfororalimplantcompositionmechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructureanalysis
AT waddelljohnn istitaniumzirconiumalloyabetteralternativetopuretitaniumfororalimplantcompositionmechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructureanalysis
AT likaic istitaniumzirconiumalloyabetteralternativetopuretitaniumfororalimplantcompositionmechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructureanalysis
AT asharmalavanya istitaniumzirconiumalloyabetteralternativetopuretitaniumfororalimplantcompositionmechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructureanalysis
AT priordavidj istitaniumzirconiumalloyabetteralternativetopuretitaniumfororalimplantcompositionmechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructureanalysis
AT duncanwarwickj istitaniumzirconiumalloyabetteralternativetopuretitaniumfororalimplantcompositionmechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructureanalysis