Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
PURPOSE: The physical and mechanical performance of a newly commercialized dental restorative material (alkasite) was compared with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and nano-hybrid composite. METHODOLOGY: Human extracted premolars were used to investigate the shear bond strength. Restorative materials wer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.012 |
_version_ | 1784598762574839808 |
---|---|
author | Naz, Fariha Samad Khan, Abdul Kader, Mohammed Abdul Al Gelban, Lamis Omar Saad Mousa, Nada Mohammed Ali Asiri, Raghad Saeed Hader Hakeem, Abbas Saeed |
author_facet | Naz, Fariha Samad Khan, Abdul Kader, Mohammed Abdul Al Gelban, Lamis Omar Saad Mousa, Nada Mohammed Ali Asiri, Raghad Saeed Hader Hakeem, Abbas Saeed |
author_sort | Naz, Fariha |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The physical and mechanical performance of a newly commercialized dental restorative material (alkasite) was compared with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and nano-hybrid composite. METHODOLOGY: Human extracted premolars were used to investigate the shear bond strength. Restorative materials were placed on the dentine surface and were aged in deionized water for 14 days. The 3-D surface roughness was evaluated before and after chewing simulation cycles (50,000). The samples were fatigued mechanically using a chewing simulator and investigated with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: For shear bond strength, alkasite showed significantly high values than GIC, whereas non-significant difference was observed between alkasite and nano-hybrid composite. After the chewing simulation (50,000 cycles), non-significant difference was found between GIC and nano-hybrid composite, where surface roughness values were highest for GIC and lowest for alkasite. CONCLUSION: The newly developed restorative material (alkasite) has shown better results than existing restorative materials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8589597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85895972021-11-19 Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials Naz, Fariha Samad Khan, Abdul Kader, Mohammed Abdul Al Gelban, Lamis Omar Saad Mousa, Nada Mohammed Ali Asiri, Raghad Saeed Hader Hakeem, Abbas Saeed Saudi Dent J Original Article PURPOSE: The physical and mechanical performance of a newly commercialized dental restorative material (alkasite) was compared with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and nano-hybrid composite. METHODOLOGY: Human extracted premolars were used to investigate the shear bond strength. Restorative materials were placed on the dentine surface and were aged in deionized water for 14 days. The 3-D surface roughness was evaluated before and after chewing simulation cycles (50,000). The samples were fatigued mechanically using a chewing simulator and investigated with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: For shear bond strength, alkasite showed significantly high values than GIC, whereas non-significant difference was observed between alkasite and nano-hybrid composite. After the chewing simulation (50,000 cycles), non-significant difference was found between GIC and nano-hybrid composite, where surface roughness values were highest for GIC and lowest for alkasite. CONCLUSION: The newly developed restorative material (alkasite) has shown better results than existing restorative materials. Elsevier 2021-11 2020-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8589597/ /pubmed/34803317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.012 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Naz, Fariha Samad Khan, Abdul Kader, Mohammed Abdul Al Gelban, Lamis Omar Saad Mousa, Nada Mohammed Ali Asiri, Raghad Saeed Hader Hakeem, Abbas Saeed Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials |
title | Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nazfariha comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials AT samadkhanabdul comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials AT kadermohammedabdul comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials AT algelbanlamisomarsaad comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials AT mousanadamohammedali comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials AT asiriraghadsaeedhader comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials AT hakeemabbassaeed comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials |