Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials

PURPOSE: The physical and mechanical performance of a newly commercialized dental restorative material (alkasite) was compared with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and nano-hybrid composite. METHODOLOGY: Human extracted premolars were used to investigate the shear bond strength. Restorative materials wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naz, Fariha, Samad Khan, Abdul, Kader, Mohammed Abdul, Al Gelban, Lamis Omar Saad, Mousa, Nada Mohammed Ali, Asiri, Raghad Saeed Hader, Hakeem, Abbas Saeed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.012
_version_ 1784598762574839808
author Naz, Fariha
Samad Khan, Abdul
Kader, Mohammed Abdul
Al Gelban, Lamis Omar Saad
Mousa, Nada Mohammed Ali
Asiri, Raghad Saeed Hader
Hakeem, Abbas Saeed
author_facet Naz, Fariha
Samad Khan, Abdul
Kader, Mohammed Abdul
Al Gelban, Lamis Omar Saad
Mousa, Nada Mohammed Ali
Asiri, Raghad Saeed Hader
Hakeem, Abbas Saeed
author_sort Naz, Fariha
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The physical and mechanical performance of a newly commercialized dental restorative material (alkasite) was compared with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and nano-hybrid composite. METHODOLOGY: Human extracted premolars were used to investigate the shear bond strength. Restorative materials were placed on the dentine surface and were aged in deionized water for 14 days. The 3-D surface roughness was evaluated before and after chewing simulation cycles (50,000). The samples were fatigued mechanically using a chewing simulator and investigated with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: For shear bond strength, alkasite showed significantly high values than GIC, whereas non-significant difference was observed between alkasite and nano-hybrid composite. After the chewing simulation (50,000 cycles), non-significant difference was found between GIC and nano-hybrid composite, where surface roughness values were highest for GIC and lowest for alkasite. CONCLUSION: The newly developed restorative material (alkasite) has shown better results than existing restorative materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8589597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85895972021-11-19 Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials Naz, Fariha Samad Khan, Abdul Kader, Mohammed Abdul Al Gelban, Lamis Omar Saad Mousa, Nada Mohammed Ali Asiri, Raghad Saeed Hader Hakeem, Abbas Saeed Saudi Dent J Original Article PURPOSE: The physical and mechanical performance of a newly commercialized dental restorative material (alkasite) was compared with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and nano-hybrid composite. METHODOLOGY: Human extracted premolars were used to investigate the shear bond strength. Restorative materials were placed on the dentine surface and were aged in deionized water for 14 days. The 3-D surface roughness was evaluated before and after chewing simulation cycles (50,000). The samples were fatigued mechanically using a chewing simulator and investigated with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: For shear bond strength, alkasite showed significantly high values than GIC, whereas non-significant difference was observed between alkasite and nano-hybrid composite. After the chewing simulation (50,000 cycles), non-significant difference was found between GIC and nano-hybrid composite, where surface roughness values were highest for GIC and lowest for alkasite. CONCLUSION: The newly developed restorative material (alkasite) has shown better results than existing restorative materials. Elsevier 2021-11 2020-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8589597/ /pubmed/34803317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.012 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Naz, Fariha
Samad Khan, Abdul
Kader, Mohammed Abdul
Al Gelban, Lamis Omar Saad
Mousa, Nada Mohammed Ali
Asiri, Raghad Saeed Hader
Hakeem, Abbas Saeed
Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
title Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
title_full Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
title_short Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
title_sort comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.012
work_keys_str_mv AT nazfariha comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials
AT samadkhanabdul comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials
AT kadermohammedabdul comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials
AT algelbanlamisomarsaad comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials
AT mousanadamohammedali comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials
AT asiriraghadsaeedhader comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials
AT hakeemabbassaeed comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials