Cargando…
Flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: An in vitro evaluation
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate the flexural strength, Young’s modulus and Weibull modulus of two heat-pressed and one CAD/CAM processed lithium disilicate (LD) ceramics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 45 specimens with dimensions 16 × 4 × 1.2 ± 0.2 mm were fabricated out of t...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.07.004 |
_version_ | 1784598768849518592 |
---|---|
author | Al-Thobity, Ahmad M. Alsalman, Abdulmohsen |
author_facet | Al-Thobity, Ahmad M. Alsalman, Abdulmohsen |
author_sort | Al-Thobity, Ahmad M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate the flexural strength, Young’s modulus and Weibull modulus of two heat-pressed and one CAD/CAM processed lithium disilicate (LD) ceramics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 45 specimens with dimensions 16 × 4 × 1.2 ± 0.2 mm were fabricated out of three LD ceramics. For heat-pressed LD specimens, acrylate polymer blocks were cut and divided into two groups (n = 15 per group); a GC LiSi Press LD group (LP) and an IPS e.max Press group (EP). Specimens for each group were pressed corresponding to the manufacturer’s recommendations. For the CAD-CAM Group (EC), IPS e.max CAD blocks were cut to obtain specimens (n = 15) to the desired dimensions. Flexural strength and Young’s modulus tests were executed using a universal testing machine. A one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tuckey’s tests were applied to analyze the results (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Regarding flexural strength, the EC group showed higher statistically substantial difference than the EP and LP groups (p = 0.001), while there was no pronounced difference between the EP and LP groups (p = 0.065). For Young’s modulus test, all the three tested groups had no statistically substantial difference (p = 0.798). CONCLUSION: The IPS e.max CAD group had higher mechanical performance than the IPS e.max Press and GC LiSi Press groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8589621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85896212021-11-19 Flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: An in vitro evaluation Al-Thobity, Ahmad M. Alsalman, Abdulmohsen Saudi Dent J Original Article OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate the flexural strength, Young’s modulus and Weibull modulus of two heat-pressed and one CAD/CAM processed lithium disilicate (LD) ceramics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 45 specimens with dimensions 16 × 4 × 1.2 ± 0.2 mm were fabricated out of three LD ceramics. For heat-pressed LD specimens, acrylate polymer blocks were cut and divided into two groups (n = 15 per group); a GC LiSi Press LD group (LP) and an IPS e.max Press group (EP). Specimens for each group were pressed corresponding to the manufacturer’s recommendations. For the CAD-CAM Group (EC), IPS e.max CAD blocks were cut to obtain specimens (n = 15) to the desired dimensions. Flexural strength and Young’s modulus tests were executed using a universal testing machine. A one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tuckey’s tests were applied to analyze the results (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Regarding flexural strength, the EC group showed higher statistically substantial difference than the EP and LP groups (p = 0.001), while there was no pronounced difference between the EP and LP groups (p = 0.065). For Young’s modulus test, all the three tested groups had no statistically substantial difference (p = 0.798). CONCLUSION: The IPS e.max CAD group had higher mechanical performance than the IPS e.max Press and GC LiSi Press groups. Elsevier 2021-11 2020-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8589621/ /pubmed/34803310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.07.004 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Al-Thobity, Ahmad M. Alsalman, Abdulmohsen Flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: An in vitro evaluation |
title | Flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: An in vitro evaluation |
title_full | Flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: An in vitro evaluation |
title_fullStr | Flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: An in vitro evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: An in vitro evaluation |
title_short | Flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: An in vitro evaluation |
title_sort | flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: an in vitro evaluation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.07.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT althobityahmadm flexuralpropertiesofthreelithiumdisilicatematerialsaninvitroevaluation AT alsalmanabdulmohsen flexuralpropertiesofthreelithiumdisilicatematerialsaninvitroevaluation |