Cargando…

Flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: An in vitro evaluation

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate the flexural strength, Young’s modulus and Weibull modulus of two heat-pressed and one CAD/CAM processed lithium disilicate (LD) ceramics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 45 specimens with dimensions 16 × 4 × 1.2 ± 0.2 mm were fabricated out of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Thobity, Ahmad M., Alsalman, Abdulmohsen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.07.004
_version_ 1784598768849518592
author Al-Thobity, Ahmad M.
Alsalman, Abdulmohsen
author_facet Al-Thobity, Ahmad M.
Alsalman, Abdulmohsen
author_sort Al-Thobity, Ahmad M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate the flexural strength, Young’s modulus and Weibull modulus of two heat-pressed and one CAD/CAM processed lithium disilicate (LD) ceramics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 45 specimens with dimensions 16 × 4 × 1.2 ± 0.2 mm were fabricated out of three LD ceramics. For heat-pressed LD specimens, acrylate polymer blocks were cut and divided into two groups (n = 15 per group); a GC LiSi Press LD group (LP) and an IPS e.max Press group (EP). Specimens for each group were pressed corresponding to the manufacturer’s recommendations. For the CAD-CAM Group (EC), IPS e.max CAD blocks were cut to obtain specimens (n = 15) to the desired dimensions. Flexural strength and Young’s modulus tests were executed using a universal testing machine. A one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tuckey’s tests were applied to analyze the results (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Regarding flexural strength, the EC group showed higher statistically substantial difference than the EP and LP groups (p = 0.001), while there was no pronounced difference between the EP and LP groups (p = 0.065). For Young’s modulus test, all the three tested groups had no statistically substantial difference (p = 0.798). CONCLUSION: The IPS e.max CAD group had higher mechanical performance than the IPS e.max Press and GC LiSi Press groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8589621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85896212021-11-19 Flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: An in vitro evaluation Al-Thobity, Ahmad M. Alsalman, Abdulmohsen Saudi Dent J Original Article OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate the flexural strength, Young’s modulus and Weibull modulus of two heat-pressed and one CAD/CAM processed lithium disilicate (LD) ceramics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 45 specimens with dimensions 16 × 4 × 1.2 ± 0.2 mm were fabricated out of three LD ceramics. For heat-pressed LD specimens, acrylate polymer blocks were cut and divided into two groups (n = 15 per group); a GC LiSi Press LD group (LP) and an IPS e.max Press group (EP). Specimens for each group were pressed corresponding to the manufacturer’s recommendations. For the CAD-CAM Group (EC), IPS e.max CAD blocks were cut to obtain specimens (n = 15) to the desired dimensions. Flexural strength and Young’s modulus tests were executed using a universal testing machine. A one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tuckey’s tests were applied to analyze the results (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Regarding flexural strength, the EC group showed higher statistically substantial difference than the EP and LP groups (p = 0.001), while there was no pronounced difference between the EP and LP groups (p = 0.065). For Young’s modulus test, all the three tested groups had no statistically substantial difference (p = 0.798). CONCLUSION: The IPS e.max CAD group had higher mechanical performance than the IPS e.max Press and GC LiSi Press groups. Elsevier 2021-11 2020-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8589621/ /pubmed/34803310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.07.004 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Al-Thobity, Ahmad M.
Alsalman, Abdulmohsen
Flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: An in vitro evaluation
title Flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: An in vitro evaluation
title_full Flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: An in vitro evaluation
title_fullStr Flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: An in vitro evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: An in vitro evaluation
title_short Flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: An in vitro evaluation
title_sort flexural properties of three lithium disilicate materials: an in vitro evaluation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.07.004
work_keys_str_mv AT althobityahmadm flexuralpropertiesofthreelithiumdisilicatematerialsaninvitroevaluation
AT alsalmanabdulmohsen flexuralpropertiesofthreelithiumdisilicatematerialsaninvitroevaluation