Cargando…
Good and bad boundaries in ultrasound compounding: preserving anatomic boundaries while suppressing artifacts
PURPOSE: Ultrasound compounding is to combine sonographic information captured from different angles and produce a single image. It is important for multi-view reconstruction, but as of yet there is no consensus on best practices for compounding. Current popular methods inevitably suppress or altoge...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34357525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02464-4 |
_version_ | 1784598794292166656 |
---|---|
author | Hung, Alex Ling Yu Galeotti, John |
author_facet | Hung, Alex Ling Yu Galeotti, John |
author_sort | Hung, Alex Ling Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Ultrasound compounding is to combine sonographic information captured from different angles and produce a single image. It is important for multi-view reconstruction, but as of yet there is no consensus on best practices for compounding. Current popular methods inevitably suppress or altogether leave out bright or dark regions that are useful and potentially introduce new artifacts. In this work, we establish a new algorithm to compound the overlapping pixels from different viewpoints in ultrasound. METHODS: Inspired by image fusion algorithms and ultrasound confidence, we uniquely leverage Laplacian and Gaussian pyramids to preserve the maximum boundary contrast without overemphasizing noise, speckles, and other artifacts in the compounded image, while taking the direction of the ultrasound probe into account. Besides, we designed an algorithm that detects the useful boundaries in ultrasound images to further improve the boundary contrast. RESULTS: We evaluate our algorithm by comparing it with previous algorithms both qualitatively and quantitatively, and we show that our approach not only preserves both light and dark details, but also somewhat suppresses noise and artifacts, rather than amplifying them. We also show that our algorithm can improve the performance of downstream tasks like segmentation. CONCLUSION: Our proposed method that is based on confidence, contrast, and both Gaussian and Laplacian pyramids appears to be better at preserving contrast at anatomic boundaries while suppressing artifacts than any of the other approaches we tested. This algorithm may have future utility with downstream tasks such as 3D ultrasound volume reconstruction and segmentation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8589734 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85897342021-11-15 Good and bad boundaries in ultrasound compounding: preserving anatomic boundaries while suppressing artifacts Hung, Alex Ling Yu Galeotti, John Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Ultrasound compounding is to combine sonographic information captured from different angles and produce a single image. It is important for multi-view reconstruction, but as of yet there is no consensus on best practices for compounding. Current popular methods inevitably suppress or altogether leave out bright or dark regions that are useful and potentially introduce new artifacts. In this work, we establish a new algorithm to compound the overlapping pixels from different viewpoints in ultrasound. METHODS: Inspired by image fusion algorithms and ultrasound confidence, we uniquely leverage Laplacian and Gaussian pyramids to preserve the maximum boundary contrast without overemphasizing noise, speckles, and other artifacts in the compounded image, while taking the direction of the ultrasound probe into account. Besides, we designed an algorithm that detects the useful boundaries in ultrasound images to further improve the boundary contrast. RESULTS: We evaluate our algorithm by comparing it with previous algorithms both qualitatively and quantitatively, and we show that our approach not only preserves both light and dark details, but also somewhat suppresses noise and artifacts, rather than amplifying them. We also show that our algorithm can improve the performance of downstream tasks like segmentation. CONCLUSION: Our proposed method that is based on confidence, contrast, and both Gaussian and Laplacian pyramids appears to be better at preserving contrast at anatomic boundaries while suppressing artifacts than any of the other approaches we tested. This algorithm may have future utility with downstream tasks such as 3D ultrasound volume reconstruction and segmentation. Springer International Publishing 2021-08-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8589734/ /pubmed/34357525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02464-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hung, Alex Ling Yu Galeotti, John Good and bad boundaries in ultrasound compounding: preserving anatomic boundaries while suppressing artifacts |
title | Good and bad boundaries in ultrasound compounding: preserving anatomic boundaries while suppressing artifacts |
title_full | Good and bad boundaries in ultrasound compounding: preserving anatomic boundaries while suppressing artifacts |
title_fullStr | Good and bad boundaries in ultrasound compounding: preserving anatomic boundaries while suppressing artifacts |
title_full_unstemmed | Good and bad boundaries in ultrasound compounding: preserving anatomic boundaries while suppressing artifacts |
title_short | Good and bad boundaries in ultrasound compounding: preserving anatomic boundaries while suppressing artifacts |
title_sort | good and bad boundaries in ultrasound compounding: preserving anatomic boundaries while suppressing artifacts |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34357525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02464-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hungalexlingyu goodandbadboundariesinultrasoundcompoundingpreservinganatomicboundarieswhilesuppressingartifacts AT galeottijohn goodandbadboundariesinultrasoundcompoundingpreservinganatomicboundarieswhilesuppressingartifacts |