Cargando…
Gender trends in authorships and publication impact in Academic Radiology—a 10-year perspective
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the development of publication numbers of female authors in high-, medium-, and low-impact radiological journals. METHODS: In this bibliometric analysis, gender of the first (FA) and senior author (SA) was assigned to all original research articles and reviews, published in 10...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34009412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07928-4 |
_version_ | 1784598798702477312 |
---|---|
author | Molwitz, Isabel Yamamura, Jin Ozga, Ann-Kathrin Wedekind, Ilka Nguyen, Thai-An Wolf, Liesa Kamo, Minobu Zhao, Jing Can, Elif Keller, Sarah |
author_facet | Molwitz, Isabel Yamamura, Jin Ozga, Ann-Kathrin Wedekind, Ilka Nguyen, Thai-An Wolf, Liesa Kamo, Minobu Zhao, Jing Can, Elif Keller, Sarah |
author_sort | Molwitz, Isabel |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To analyze the development of publication numbers of female authors in high-, medium-, and low-impact radiological journals. METHODS: In this bibliometric analysis, gender of the first (FA) and senior author (SA) was assigned to all original research articles and reviews, published in 10 high-, medium-, and low-impact radiological journals in 2007/8 and 2017/18. The adjusted event rate (AER) and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) were calculated using mixed logistic and multinomial logistic regression models to assess and compare female publications according to impact factor, journal, author position, and combination. RESULTS: The proportion of female FA and female SA in N = 6979 (2007/2008) and N = 7383 (2017/2018) articles increased to 29.1% and 16.1% in 2017/2018, respectively. While most female authorships were continuously observed in medium-impact journals, the strongest increase occurred for both female FA (AOR 2.0; p < .0001) and SA (AOR 2.1; p < .0001) in low-impact journals. Female SA published significantly more often in a low- (AOR 1.5) or medium- (AOR 1.8) than in a high-ranking journal. Among the high-ranking journals, female FA published most frequently in European Radiology (32.4%; 95% CI [29.3–35.8]; p < .0001), female SA in Investigative Radiology (15.9%; 95% CI [13.7–18.4]; p < .0001). Male same-sex authorships decreased (AOR 0.9), but remained at least twice as common as all-female or mixed authorships. CONCLUSION: The increase in female authorship is reflected in all impact areas. Female FA and SA increased most in low-ranking journals but are most common in medium-ranking journals. Female SA remain rare, especially in high impact journals. KEY POINTS: • Compared to the proportion of female radiologists worldwide, female senior authors are underrepresented in all impact areas, in particular in high-impact journals. • Among the included high-ranking radiological journals, female first authors and senior authors were strongest represented in European Radiology and Investigative Radiology, while across all impact areas they mostly published in medium-ranking journals. • Female author combinations were more frequent in low- and medium- than in high-ranking journals, whereas male author combinations remained more common than female senior author collaborations in all impact areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8589752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85897522021-11-15 Gender trends in authorships and publication impact in Academic Radiology—a 10-year perspective Molwitz, Isabel Yamamura, Jin Ozga, Ann-Kathrin Wedekind, Ilka Nguyen, Thai-An Wolf, Liesa Kamo, Minobu Zhao, Jing Can, Elif Keller, Sarah Eur Radiol Radiological Education OBJECTIVES: To analyze the development of publication numbers of female authors in high-, medium-, and low-impact radiological journals. METHODS: In this bibliometric analysis, gender of the first (FA) and senior author (SA) was assigned to all original research articles and reviews, published in 10 high-, medium-, and low-impact radiological journals in 2007/8 and 2017/18. The adjusted event rate (AER) and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) were calculated using mixed logistic and multinomial logistic regression models to assess and compare female publications according to impact factor, journal, author position, and combination. RESULTS: The proportion of female FA and female SA in N = 6979 (2007/2008) and N = 7383 (2017/2018) articles increased to 29.1% and 16.1% in 2017/2018, respectively. While most female authorships were continuously observed in medium-impact journals, the strongest increase occurred for both female FA (AOR 2.0; p < .0001) and SA (AOR 2.1; p < .0001) in low-impact journals. Female SA published significantly more often in a low- (AOR 1.5) or medium- (AOR 1.8) than in a high-ranking journal. Among the high-ranking journals, female FA published most frequently in European Radiology (32.4%; 95% CI [29.3–35.8]; p < .0001), female SA in Investigative Radiology (15.9%; 95% CI [13.7–18.4]; p < .0001). Male same-sex authorships decreased (AOR 0.9), but remained at least twice as common as all-female or mixed authorships. CONCLUSION: The increase in female authorship is reflected in all impact areas. Female FA and SA increased most in low-ranking journals but are most common in medium-ranking journals. Female SA remain rare, especially in high impact journals. KEY POINTS: • Compared to the proportion of female radiologists worldwide, female senior authors are underrepresented in all impact areas, in particular in high-impact journals. • Among the included high-ranking radiological journals, female first authors and senior authors were strongest represented in European Radiology and Investigative Radiology, while across all impact areas they mostly published in medium-ranking journals. • Female author combinations were more frequent in low- and medium- than in high-ranking journals, whereas male author combinations remained more common than female senior author collaborations in all impact areas. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8589752/ /pubmed/34009412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07928-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Radiological Education Molwitz, Isabel Yamamura, Jin Ozga, Ann-Kathrin Wedekind, Ilka Nguyen, Thai-An Wolf, Liesa Kamo, Minobu Zhao, Jing Can, Elif Keller, Sarah Gender trends in authorships and publication impact in Academic Radiology—a 10-year perspective |
title | Gender trends in authorships and publication impact in Academic Radiology—a 10-year perspective |
title_full | Gender trends in authorships and publication impact in Academic Radiology—a 10-year perspective |
title_fullStr | Gender trends in authorships and publication impact in Academic Radiology—a 10-year perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Gender trends in authorships and publication impact in Academic Radiology—a 10-year perspective |
title_short | Gender trends in authorships and publication impact in Academic Radiology—a 10-year perspective |
title_sort | gender trends in authorships and publication impact in academic radiology—a 10-year perspective |
topic | Radiological Education |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34009412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07928-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT molwitzisabel gendertrendsinauthorshipsandpublicationimpactinacademicradiologya10yearperspective AT yamamurajin gendertrendsinauthorshipsandpublicationimpactinacademicradiologya10yearperspective AT ozgaannkathrin gendertrendsinauthorshipsandpublicationimpactinacademicradiologya10yearperspective AT wedekindilka gendertrendsinauthorshipsandpublicationimpactinacademicradiologya10yearperspective AT nguyenthaian gendertrendsinauthorshipsandpublicationimpactinacademicradiologya10yearperspective AT wolfliesa gendertrendsinauthorshipsandpublicationimpactinacademicradiologya10yearperspective AT kamominobu gendertrendsinauthorshipsandpublicationimpactinacademicradiologya10yearperspective AT zhaojing gendertrendsinauthorshipsandpublicationimpactinacademicradiologya10yearperspective AT canelif gendertrendsinauthorshipsandpublicationimpactinacademicradiologya10yearperspective AT kellersarah gendertrendsinauthorshipsandpublicationimpactinacademicradiologya10yearperspective |