Cargando…

Increased Use of Prophylactic Measures in Preventing Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), pancreatic duct stenting, and intensive intravenous hydration have been proven to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. Trial participation and guideline changes demanded an assessment of the clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sperna Weiland, Christina J., Engels, Megan M. L., Poen, Alexander C., Bhalla, Abha, Venneman, Niels G., van Hooft, Jeanin E., Bruno, Marco J., Verdonk, Robert C., Fockens, Paul, Drenth, Joost P. H., van Geenen, Erwin J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06796-0
_version_ 1784598808079892480
author Sperna Weiland, Christina J.
Engels, Megan M. L.
Poen, Alexander C.
Bhalla, Abha
Venneman, Niels G.
van Hooft, Jeanin E.
Bruno, Marco J.
Verdonk, Robert C.
Fockens, Paul
Drenth, Joost P. H.
van Geenen, Erwin J. M.
author_facet Sperna Weiland, Christina J.
Engels, Megan M. L.
Poen, Alexander C.
Bhalla, Abha
Venneman, Niels G.
van Hooft, Jeanin E.
Bruno, Marco J.
Verdonk, Robert C.
Fockens, Paul
Drenth, Joost P. H.
van Geenen, Erwin J. M.
author_sort Sperna Weiland, Christina J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), pancreatic duct stenting, and intensive intravenous hydration have been proven to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. Trial participation and guideline changes demanded an assessment of the clinical practice of post-ERCP pancreatitis prophylaxis. AIMS: The surveys aim to identify points of improvement to inform and educate ERCPists about current evidence-based practice. METHODS: Two anonymous surveys were conducted among Dutch gastroenterologists in 2013 (n = 408) and 2020 (n = 575) for longitudinal views and attitudes pertaining to post-ERCP pancreatitis prophylaxis and recognition of post-ERCP pancreatitis risk factors. RESULTS: In 2013 and 2020, respectively, 121 and 109 ERCPists responded. In the 2013 survey, 98% of them utilized NSAID prophylaxis and 62% pancreatic duct stent prophylaxis in specific cases. In the 2020 survey, the use of NSAIDs (100%), pancreatic duct stents (78%), and intensive intravenous hydration (33%) increased among ERCPists. NSAID prophylaxis was the preferred prophylactic measure for all risk factors in the 2020 survey, except for ampullectomy, pancreatic duct contrast injection, and pancreatic duct cannulation, for which NSAID prophylaxis and pancreatic duct stent combined was equally favored or preferred. CONCLUSION: Rectal NSAIDs are the most applied post-ERCP pancreatitis prophylaxis in the Netherlands, followed by pancreatic duct stents and intensive intravenous hydration. Additionally, there is reason to believe that recent guideline updates and active research participation have led to increased prophylaxis implementation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10620-020-06796-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8589790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85897902021-11-15 Increased Use of Prophylactic Measures in Preventing Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis Sperna Weiland, Christina J. Engels, Megan M. L. Poen, Alexander C. Bhalla, Abha Venneman, Niels G. van Hooft, Jeanin E. Bruno, Marco J. Verdonk, Robert C. Fockens, Paul Drenth, Joost P. H. van Geenen, Erwin J. M. Dig Dis Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), pancreatic duct stenting, and intensive intravenous hydration have been proven to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. Trial participation and guideline changes demanded an assessment of the clinical practice of post-ERCP pancreatitis prophylaxis. AIMS: The surveys aim to identify points of improvement to inform and educate ERCPists about current evidence-based practice. METHODS: Two anonymous surveys were conducted among Dutch gastroenterologists in 2013 (n = 408) and 2020 (n = 575) for longitudinal views and attitudes pertaining to post-ERCP pancreatitis prophylaxis and recognition of post-ERCP pancreatitis risk factors. RESULTS: In 2013 and 2020, respectively, 121 and 109 ERCPists responded. In the 2013 survey, 98% of them utilized NSAID prophylaxis and 62% pancreatic duct stent prophylaxis in specific cases. In the 2020 survey, the use of NSAIDs (100%), pancreatic duct stents (78%), and intensive intravenous hydration (33%) increased among ERCPists. NSAID prophylaxis was the preferred prophylactic measure for all risk factors in the 2020 survey, except for ampullectomy, pancreatic duct contrast injection, and pancreatic duct cannulation, for which NSAID prophylaxis and pancreatic duct stent combined was equally favored or preferred. CONCLUSION: Rectal NSAIDs are the most applied post-ERCP pancreatitis prophylaxis in the Netherlands, followed by pancreatic duct stents and intensive intravenous hydration. Additionally, there is reason to believe that recent guideline updates and active research participation have led to increased prophylaxis implementation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10620-020-06796-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2021-02-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8589790/ /pubmed/33630216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06796-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Sperna Weiland, Christina J.
Engels, Megan M. L.
Poen, Alexander C.
Bhalla, Abha
Venneman, Niels G.
van Hooft, Jeanin E.
Bruno, Marco J.
Verdonk, Robert C.
Fockens, Paul
Drenth, Joost P. H.
van Geenen, Erwin J. M.
Increased Use of Prophylactic Measures in Preventing Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis
title Increased Use of Prophylactic Measures in Preventing Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis
title_full Increased Use of Prophylactic Measures in Preventing Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis
title_fullStr Increased Use of Prophylactic Measures in Preventing Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis
title_full_unstemmed Increased Use of Prophylactic Measures in Preventing Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis
title_short Increased Use of Prophylactic Measures in Preventing Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis
title_sort increased use of prophylactic measures in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06796-0
work_keys_str_mv AT spernaweilandchristinaj increaseduseofprophylacticmeasuresinpreventingpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT engelsmeganml increaseduseofprophylacticmeasuresinpreventingpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT poenalexanderc increaseduseofprophylacticmeasuresinpreventingpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT bhallaabha increaseduseofprophylacticmeasuresinpreventingpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT vennemannielsg increaseduseofprophylacticmeasuresinpreventingpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT vanhooftjeanine increaseduseofprophylacticmeasuresinpreventingpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT brunomarcoj increaseduseofprophylacticmeasuresinpreventingpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT verdonkrobertc increaseduseofprophylacticmeasuresinpreventingpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT fockenspaul increaseduseofprophylacticmeasuresinpreventingpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT drenthjoostph increaseduseofprophylacticmeasuresinpreventingpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT vangeenenerwinjm increaseduseofprophylacticmeasuresinpreventingpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT increaseduseofprophylacticmeasuresinpreventingpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis