Cargando…

Does it matter for the radiologists’ performance whether they read short or long batches in organized mammographic screening?

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between radiologists’ performance and image position within a batch in screen reading of mammograms in Norway. METHOD: We described true and false positives and true and false negatives by groups of image positions and batch sizes for 2,937,312 screen readings p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Backmann, Heinrich A., Larsen, Marthe, Danielsen, Anders S., Hofvind, Solveig
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:	Breast
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34110427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08010-9

Ejemplares similares

Possible strategies for use of artificial intelligence in screen-reading of mammograms, based on retrospective data from 122,969 screening examinations
por: Larsen, Marthe, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Screen-detected and interval breast cancer after concordant and discordant interpretations in a population based screening program using independent double reading
por: Martiniussen, Marit A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Artificial intelligence in BreastScreen Norway: a retrospective analysis of a cancer-enriched sample including 1254 breast cancer cases
por: Koch, Henrik Wethe, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists’ qualitative classification
por: Sartor, Hanna, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Radiological review of prior screening mammograms of screen-detected breast cancer
por: Hovda, Tone, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Can artificial intelligence reduce the interval cancer rate in mammography screening?
por: Lång, Kristina, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration
por: Skaane, Per, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Survival among women diagnosed with screen-detected or interval breast cancer classified as true, minimal signs, or missed through an informed radiological review
por: Tsuruda, Kaitlyn M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cross-national comparison of screening mammography accuracy measures in U.S., Norway, and Spain
por: Domingo, Laia, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A randomized controlled trial of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in population-based screening in Bergen: interim analysis of performance indicators from the To-Be trial
por: Aase, Hildegunn S., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Breast cancer detection: radiologists’ performance using mammography with and without automated whole-breast ultrasound
por: Kelly, Kevin M., et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI
por: Wengert, G. J., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Can we reduce the workload of mammographic screening by automatic identification of normal exams with artificial intelligence? A feasibility study
por: Rodriguez-Ruiz, Alejandro, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Mammographic and sonographic features of fat necrosis of the breast
por: Upadhyaya, Vidya S, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Survival outcome assessment for triple-negative breast cancer: a nomogram analysis based on integrated clinicopathological, sonographic, and mammographic characteristics
por: Sheng, Dan-li, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Provision of follow-up care for women with a history of breast cancer following the 2016 position paper by the Italian Group for Mammographic Screening and the Italian College of Breast Radiologists by SIRM: a survey of Senonetwork Italian breast centres
por: Deandrea, Silvia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Breast arterial calcifications as a biomarker of cardiovascular risk: radiologists’ awareness, reporting, and action. A survey among the EUSOBI members
por: Trimboli, Rubina Manuela, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of different reading strategies implementing artificial intelligence
por: Dahlblom, Victor, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Mammographic Density Estimation with Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurement
por: Ko, Su Yeon, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts
por: van Zelst, Jan C. M., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The Efficacy of Mammography Boot Camp to Improve the Performance of Radiologists
por: Lee, Eun Hye, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Association Between Lifestyle Changes, Mammographic Breast Density, and Breast Cancer
por: Lester, Sara P, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison between two packages for pectoral muscle removal on mammographic images
por: Sansone, Mario, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Axillary Lymphadenopathy in the COVID-19 Era: What the Radiologist Needs to Know
por: Zhang, Meng, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Mammographic and sonographic findings in the breast and axillary tail following a COVID-19 vaccine
por: Locklin, Jasmine N., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Mammographic, Sonographic, and MRI Features of Primary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Breast: A Case Report
Publicado: (2021)

Radiologists' Performance for Detecting Lesions and the Interobserver Variability of Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound
por: Kim, Sung Hun, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Metastatic melanoma presenting as a breast mass – role of radiologist as a clinician
por: Sharma, Swati, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Gender, letters, relatives, and God: mediating actors in mammographic screening among Pakistani women in Norway
por: Bhargava, Sameer, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Introduction of a New Staging System of Breast Cancer for Radiologists: An Emphasis on the Prognostic Stage
por: Koh, Jieun, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Risk of breast cancer after false‐positive results in mammographic screening
por: Román, Marta, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Mammographic calcifications undergoing percutaneous biopsy: outcome in women with and without a personal history of breast cancer
por: Bertani, Valeria, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Optimising breast cancer screening reading: blinding the second reader to the first reader’s decisions
por: Cooper, Jennifer A., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Changes in Automated Mammographic Breast Density Can Predict Pathological Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
por: Ahn, Jee Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Interpretation of mammographic breast microcalcification: interobserver variability between radiologists and mammographers and analysis of best mammographic predictors of histopathological outcomes
por: Naidu, LS, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Evaluation of single-view contrast-enhanced mammography as novel reading strategy: a non-inferiority feasibility study
por: Lobbes, M. B. I., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Breast imaging and cancer diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations from the Italian College of Breast Radiologists by SIRM
por: Pediconi, Federica, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Improving the Performance of Radiologists Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Detection Support Software for Mammography: A Multi-Reader Study
por: Lee, Jeong Hoon, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Impact of artificial intelligence support on accuracy and reading time in breast tomosynthesis image interpretation: a multi-reader multi-case study
por: van Winkel, Suzanne L., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Scoring System to Stratify Malignancy Risks for Mammographic Microcalcifications Based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 5th Edition Descriptors
por: Youk, Ji Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_d7a47lnrpr2d8jgvld5ej054er