Cargando…
Mobile devices and wearable technology for measuring patient outcomes after surgery: a systematic review
Complications following surgery are common and frequently occur the following discharge. Mobile and wearable digital health interventions (DHI) provide an opportunity to monitor and support patients during their postoperative recovery. Lack of high-quality evidence is often cited as a barrier to DHI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34773071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00525-1 |
_version_ | 1784598870417735680 |
---|---|
author | Knight, Stephen R. Ng, Nathan Tsanas, Athanasios Mclean, Kenneth Pagliari, Claudia Harrison, Ewen M. |
author_facet | Knight, Stephen R. Ng, Nathan Tsanas, Athanasios Mclean, Kenneth Pagliari, Claudia Harrison, Ewen M. |
author_sort | Knight, Stephen R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Complications following surgery are common and frequently occur the following discharge. Mobile and wearable digital health interventions (DHI) provide an opportunity to monitor and support patients during their postoperative recovery. Lack of high-quality evidence is often cited as a barrier to DHI implementation. This review captures and appraises the current use, evidence base and reporting quality of mobile and wearable DHI following surgery. Keyword searches were performed within Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and WHO Global Index Medicus databases, together with clinical trial registries and Google scholar. Studies involving patients undergoing any surgery requiring skin incision where postoperative outcomes were measured using a DHI following hospital discharge were included, with DHI defined as mobile and wireless technologies for health to improve health system efficiency and health outcomes. Methodological reporting quality was determined using the validated mobile health evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) guidelines. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for randomised studies or MINORS depending on study type. Overall, 6969 articles were screened, with 44 articles included. The majority (n = 34) described small prospective study designs, with a high risk of bias demonstrated. Reporting standards were suboptimal across all domains, particularly in relation to data security, prior patient engagement and cost analysis. Despite the potential of DHI to improve postoperative patient care, current progress is severely restricted by limitations in methodological reporting. There is an urgent need to improve reporting for DHI following surgery to identify patient benefit, promote reproducibility and encourage sustainability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8590052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85900522021-11-15 Mobile devices and wearable technology for measuring patient outcomes after surgery: a systematic review Knight, Stephen R. Ng, Nathan Tsanas, Athanasios Mclean, Kenneth Pagliari, Claudia Harrison, Ewen M. NPJ Digit Med Article Complications following surgery are common and frequently occur the following discharge. Mobile and wearable digital health interventions (DHI) provide an opportunity to monitor and support patients during their postoperative recovery. Lack of high-quality evidence is often cited as a barrier to DHI implementation. This review captures and appraises the current use, evidence base and reporting quality of mobile and wearable DHI following surgery. Keyword searches were performed within Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and WHO Global Index Medicus databases, together with clinical trial registries and Google scholar. Studies involving patients undergoing any surgery requiring skin incision where postoperative outcomes were measured using a DHI following hospital discharge were included, with DHI defined as mobile and wireless technologies for health to improve health system efficiency and health outcomes. Methodological reporting quality was determined using the validated mobile health evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) guidelines. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for randomised studies or MINORS depending on study type. Overall, 6969 articles were screened, with 44 articles included. The majority (n = 34) described small prospective study designs, with a high risk of bias demonstrated. Reporting standards were suboptimal across all domains, particularly in relation to data security, prior patient engagement and cost analysis. Despite the potential of DHI to improve postoperative patient care, current progress is severely restricted by limitations in methodological reporting. There is an urgent need to improve reporting for DHI following surgery to identify patient benefit, promote reproducibility and encourage sustainability. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8590052/ /pubmed/34773071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00525-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Knight, Stephen R. Ng, Nathan Tsanas, Athanasios Mclean, Kenneth Pagliari, Claudia Harrison, Ewen M. Mobile devices and wearable technology for measuring patient outcomes after surgery: a systematic review |
title | Mobile devices and wearable technology for measuring patient outcomes after surgery: a systematic review |
title_full | Mobile devices and wearable technology for measuring patient outcomes after surgery: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Mobile devices and wearable technology for measuring patient outcomes after surgery: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Mobile devices and wearable technology for measuring patient outcomes after surgery: a systematic review |
title_short | Mobile devices and wearable technology for measuring patient outcomes after surgery: a systematic review |
title_sort | mobile devices and wearable technology for measuring patient outcomes after surgery: a systematic review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34773071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00525-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knightstephenr mobiledevicesandwearabletechnologyformeasuringpatientoutcomesaftersurgeryasystematicreview AT ngnathan mobiledevicesandwearabletechnologyformeasuringpatientoutcomesaftersurgeryasystematicreview AT tsanasathanasios mobiledevicesandwearabletechnologyformeasuringpatientoutcomesaftersurgeryasystematicreview AT mcleankenneth mobiledevicesandwearabletechnologyformeasuringpatientoutcomesaftersurgeryasystematicreview AT pagliariclaudia mobiledevicesandwearabletechnologyformeasuringpatientoutcomesaftersurgeryasystematicreview AT harrisonewenm mobiledevicesandwearabletechnologyformeasuringpatientoutcomesaftersurgeryasystematicreview |