Cargando…

Prophylactic paclitaxel-eluting stent placement does not improve covered femoropopliteal stent patency()

OBJECTIVE: Covered stents are an important tool in managing femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease. However, their performance is impaired by edge neointimal hyperplasia and restenosis. We examined the effectiveness of prophylactic deployment of paclitaxel-eluting stents to prevent edge resteno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marples, Rory, Binks, Matthew, Spina, Roberto, Wright, Melissa, Huilgol, Ravi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2021.09.004
_version_ 1784598873911590912
author Marples, Rory
Binks, Matthew
Spina, Roberto
Wright, Melissa
Huilgol, Ravi
author_facet Marples, Rory
Binks, Matthew
Spina, Roberto
Wright, Melissa
Huilgol, Ravi
author_sort Marples, Rory
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Covered stents are an important tool in managing femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease. However, their performance is impaired by edge neointimal hyperplasia and restenosis. We examined the effectiveness of prophylactic deployment of paclitaxel-eluting stents to prevent edge restenosis. METHODS: A retrospective case–control study was performed. Patients with femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease who were treated with Viabahn stent placement were compared to patients treated with Viabahn stents deployed in conjunction with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PTX). The primary outcome was time to loss of stent primary patency. The Kaplan–Meier method was used. RESULTS: A total of 36 Viabahn and 25 Viabahn + paclitaxel-eluting stent procedures were evaluated, with mean follow-up periods of 27 and 18 months, respectively. The Viabahn + paclitaxel-eluting stent group had a longer length of vessel stented (P = .0023). Twelve-month primary patency was 74% in the Viabahn group and 75% in the Viabahn + paclitaxel-eluting stent group. Pre-existing dyslipidemia correlated with earlier loss of primary patency across the combined cohort (P = .0193). CONCLUSION: Viabahn stent primary patency is unaffected by the addition of paclitaxel-eluting stents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8590064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85900642021-11-19 Prophylactic paclitaxel-eluting stent placement does not improve covered femoropopliteal stent patency() Marples, Rory Binks, Matthew Spina, Roberto Wright, Melissa Huilgol, Ravi Surg Open Sci Article OBJECTIVE: Covered stents are an important tool in managing femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease. However, their performance is impaired by edge neointimal hyperplasia and restenosis. We examined the effectiveness of prophylactic deployment of paclitaxel-eluting stents to prevent edge restenosis. METHODS: A retrospective case–control study was performed. Patients with femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease who were treated with Viabahn stent placement were compared to patients treated with Viabahn stents deployed in conjunction with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PTX). The primary outcome was time to loss of stent primary patency. The Kaplan–Meier method was used. RESULTS: A total of 36 Viabahn and 25 Viabahn + paclitaxel-eluting stent procedures were evaluated, with mean follow-up periods of 27 and 18 months, respectively. The Viabahn + paclitaxel-eluting stent group had a longer length of vessel stented (P = .0023). Twelve-month primary patency was 74% in the Viabahn group and 75% in the Viabahn + paclitaxel-eluting stent group. Pre-existing dyslipidemia correlated with earlier loss of primary patency across the combined cohort (P = .0193). CONCLUSION: Viabahn stent primary patency is unaffected by the addition of paclitaxel-eluting stents. Elsevier 2021-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8590064/ /pubmed/34805818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2021.09.004 Text en Crown Copyright © 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Marples, Rory
Binks, Matthew
Spina, Roberto
Wright, Melissa
Huilgol, Ravi
Prophylactic paclitaxel-eluting stent placement does not improve covered femoropopliteal stent patency()
title Prophylactic paclitaxel-eluting stent placement does not improve covered femoropopliteal stent patency()
title_full Prophylactic paclitaxel-eluting stent placement does not improve covered femoropopliteal stent patency()
title_fullStr Prophylactic paclitaxel-eluting stent placement does not improve covered femoropopliteal stent patency()
title_full_unstemmed Prophylactic paclitaxel-eluting stent placement does not improve covered femoropopliteal stent patency()
title_short Prophylactic paclitaxel-eluting stent placement does not improve covered femoropopliteal stent patency()
title_sort prophylactic paclitaxel-eluting stent placement does not improve covered femoropopliteal stent patency()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2021.09.004
work_keys_str_mv AT marplesrory prophylacticpaclitaxelelutingstentplacementdoesnotimprovecoveredfemoropoplitealstentpatency
AT binksmatthew prophylacticpaclitaxelelutingstentplacementdoesnotimprovecoveredfemoropoplitealstentpatency
AT spinaroberto prophylacticpaclitaxelelutingstentplacementdoesnotimprovecoveredfemoropoplitealstentpatency
AT wrightmelissa prophylacticpaclitaxelelutingstentplacementdoesnotimprovecoveredfemoropoplitealstentpatency
AT huilgolravi prophylacticpaclitaxelelutingstentplacementdoesnotimprovecoveredfemoropoplitealstentpatency